Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Swim Trading Trade Discussion

Channel

Swim Trading Trade Discussion

@swimtrading

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,121subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001152341607
TypeChannel
Username@swimtrading
CreatedBetween 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/swimtrading

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0763,1223,0997 August 2026 — 3,076 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,082 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,085 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,088 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,095 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,102 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,106 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,111 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,114 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,119 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,122 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,121 subscribers3,1217 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,069–3,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:413,121-1
11 Sept 2026, 09:563,122+3
6 Sept 2026, 17:173,119+5
2 Sept 2026, 07:043,114+3
30 Aug 2026, 08:433,111+5
27 Aug 2026, 00:033,106+4
24 Aug 2026, 09:343,102+7
20 Aug 2026, 21:343,095+7
17 Aug 2026, 19:073,088+3
14 Aug 2026, 15:263,085+3
11 Aug 2026, 06:013,082+5
8 Aug 2026, 00:403,077+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:463,076first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6939.0%
💯5631.6%
👍4123.2%
😍95.08%
👏10.565%
🤣10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC546 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔔 Did your alert ring last night? 🔔 Coca-Cola (KO) reached it's support area, triggering my price alert. Here comes the most important question: Will KO bounce higher from here? 🔼 Are you excited to find out tonight? Give me a "💯" if you are!

💯22

3 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC694 viewsread 7 August 2026

Retail has changed a lot over the years. Metro is the latest department store to close in Singapore, joining names like Robinsons and John Little. It’s a reminder that even well-known businesses can lose relevance. But 1 global consumer brand has done the opposite. 😮 It has remained relevant for more than 140 years, and its stock has been surprisingly strong. In the past 11 months alone, it has made 13 explosive

1 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC835 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

It's here, finally! 🥳 After waiting for a week, the price that I've been waiting for has reached. I'd been waiting for the shares of Packaging Corp (PKG) to pull back to $245 and bounce before buying them. Where do you think I'll be taking profit at? I'll consider taking profit at around $262.20 for a quick profit of over 6%. Do you think the bounce will come on Mon? Give me a "❤️" if you think so!

12

27 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,260 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

At 1st glance, this stock looks easy to ignore. After all, the company is large, mature, and operates in a sector that rarely gets anyone excited. But when I looked at its chart, I got excited. The stock has been stronger than the market, stronger than most would expect, and unusually explosive for a company of this size. 🚀 Now, after another sharp move higher, it may be heading toward the moment that matters mos

3👏1

26 Jul 2026, 03:36 UTC≈1,050 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Rush Street Interactive's shares (RSI) were so promising. They bounced on Mon. 🔼 So what did I do? I bought RSI, wanting to ride its next upmove. And it shot up on Mon. 🚀 Tue came, and the market had other plans. Given the sudden drop in its share price and approaching earnings release date, I'll be cutting this trade on Mon. I'm off to hunt for a stock to share with you soon. Are you looking forward?

👍13

20 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A strange smell in my home kept me awake for 2 nights. I checked every electrical appliance, expecting to find something overheating. Nothing. 😌 Only after reading a news report did I realise the smell wasn't coming from my home at all. The market can also be misread. It can look risky and dangerous when great opportunities are appearing. Over the weekend, I found this explosive stock that has produced 27 huge

2🤣1😍1

18 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,210 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Phew! Axon's shares (AXON) were pulling back nicely until... Until falling below its support area of around $560. When its share price rose on Tue, there was a faint hope that it could head higher. But the market had other ideas. With a sound trade plan, I've avoided a potential loss. 🙏 I'm no longer looking at this stock. Do you agree that a sound plan is important? Give me a "💯" if you agree!

💯171

13 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,540 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🛰 SpaceX grabbed all the attention after its IPO. 🛰 But attention doesn't always create opportunity. The stock surged almost 50% before giving back most of its gains. That's 1 reason I rarely trade newly listed companies. Without sufficient price history, emotions often outweigh logic. Instead, I've been studying a company that's been publicly traded for over 25 years. Its shares have outperformed the S&P 500 by

7

11 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,240 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

No one likes to overpay for anything. Unless you are in search of an exclusive experience or a rare solution. Trading stocks don't fall under this category though. Last week, I'd shared about Arcus Biosciences (RCUS). 💊 I found that it was expensive and therefore, I would like for RCUS to fall to this price before I'd consider an entry. That price is around $28.20. RCUS has finally fallen to around $28.20. I'

😍86

6 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1 habit has helped me avoid countless bad trades. I never buy simply because a stock is rising. Instead, I first ask: • Is it outperforming the market? • Does it have a history of explosive moves? • Am I buying at a sensible price? This week's featured company ticked the first two boxes easily. ✅ Now I'm waiting for the 3rd. A pullback is already underway, and I've identified the support zone I'll be watching cl

1💯1

4 Jul 2026, 00:26 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The wait could be finally over. Vaxcyte's shares (PCVX) could continue to pullback and reach around $54 in the coming days before rising. My game plan remains the same. Are you looking forward to the above scenario to play out? Give me a "💯" if you are!

💯7

29 Jun 2026, 09:44 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 7 August 2026

1 of my favourite habits is comparing a stock against the S&P 500 before doing anything else. Why? I want my money working in stocks that are outperforming the market—not lagging behind it. 🏆 This week's company passed that test with flying colors. Its shares kept climbing even while the broader market struggled in June. Now comes the difficult part... Waiting. 🧘‍♂️ I've identified the support area where I bel

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swimtrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Real Rayner Teo
@tradingwithrayner · 76,106
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
SGX Invest
@sgxinvest · 25,235
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Swim Trading Trade Discussion” (@swimtrading), 3,121 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swimtrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.