Channel
@swingtradefx1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,122subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001348717496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swingtradefx1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swingtradefx1 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 2,122 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 2,131 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 2,133 | -6 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 2,139 | -7 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2,146 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
186 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 54.8% | |
| 🔥 | 63 | 33.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 4.30% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.69% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.61% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.61% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Good with the returns at +18.8rr. "Aggressive sell" played out as described for context: $1k risked on this trade could make an $18k return $2k risked is $37k profit this is the power of low frequency but high quality trading. Have a great week
🔥15❤13🏆3💯3
as described for a 19rr run.
🔥10❤7👍5🙊1
The market is ranging so far this week on GJ .. with a sustained diminishing bullish pressure. I would expect to see a very aggressive bearish action around the 217 zone. This sell upon confirmation would be a very aggressive one and could be sustained over the next few days or weeks
❤11
If your personal account is currently $10k and above Or you are trading a $200k and above prop acct Send a DM to CONTACT ADMIN 👆🏽or @yemiSTFX We got something for ya🚀🧨🔥
❤7👍1
Good opportunities lining up for the week!
Happy new week!!
❤1
Trade didn’t end up confirming Means another week of opportunity No sweating it, no revenge just focus. Enjoy a great weekend
❤15🔥7
This is what the process of a trader should look like... nothing jumping in and out of trades impulsively all i do is let my edge do the work and present me with the IFs and WHENs then i make the decisions . If you wanna join my inner circle where i demonstrate this live on weekly basis, hit the CONTACT ADMIN BUTTON above👆🏽👆🏽 or visit https://swingtradefxacademy.com/#pricing and join the CONCLAVE! Perhaps you w…
🔥5❤3👍2
Levels identified and key confirmation factors obtained.. its simple and here they are : 1) first PATIENCE....(but why should i be patient ??) 2) Well i need to see a change in market structure around my zone of interest as this confirms the strength of the level.. (all this communicate to me is that more bears at that zone.. Remember Yemi's little rule for the people who subscribed my BOOTCAMP 2.0 program .. let…
❤3👏1
Market looks like a very excellent opportunity going to the 1h Timeframe.. all i need to do now is read the structure and find my confirmations.. Just for your education: when finding confirmations, think in terms of ifs and when e.g ..if i see this, i do that... or when this happen i do this...
👏2✍1❤1
but if you look closely, that previous support is rejecting this level and may initiate the retracement which "may" form the second W pattern (pay attention to my choice of words as it reflect my thinking pattern and psychology) Hence, if thats the case since this is the 4h TF ..it could translate to good opportunity on the LTF.. (Looks like it may fetch us some RR)
❤2🔥1
Recall the breakdown! the market broke below my POI level for the week as discussed in the live break down at the beginning of the week. and my plan was clear, buy back the retracement cos this is a HTF play so there will be some major LTF opportunity! and this is what i expect on the 4h TF with the respective zones
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swingtradefx1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SwingTradeFX 📈” (@swingtradefx1), 2,122 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swingtradefx1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.