Channel
@sws_drift
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
294subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002606366879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sws_drift |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sws_drift |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 294 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 293 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 294 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 280 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 277 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 277 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 45 | 46.4% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 22.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 13.4% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 13.4% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.03% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqw4uWto | 1 | 12 May 2026 | 12 May 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Всем привет! Мы подготовили для вас, лучших в мире зрителей конкурс! Рисунки, плакаты, сувениры и все вашей душе угодно, связанное с дрифтом и нашей командой. Что вы получите Каждый участник конкурса получит нашу фирменную панамку Первые 3 мест получат дрифт такси на нашем боевом автомобиле на ночной катке в субботу. Итоги подведем в субботу в 17:00 Количество панамок ограничено! Для участия в конкурсе так же необход…
👍3❤2🔥2😎1
Video, posted without a caption
👍2
Channel name was changed to «SWS_DRIFT»
Почему имя Кеичи Цучии до сих пор так важно для дрифта? Как японская дрифт индустрия повлияла на людей, машины и проекты в России? Как культура, пришедшая из другой страны, стала своей? «Культурные ценности» — документальный фильм Line UP о российской дрифт культуре, её японских корнях и людях, для которых автомобиль давно стал больше, чем просто транспорт. На DRIFT EXPO мы встречаем: Антона Форсажа, Никиту Шикова…
❤1
Тизер нового фильма, про смену поколений, но не у пилотов, а у кузовов! Как думаете, скоро все будут ездить на свежих кузовах или искать по помойкам старые?
❤1
Итак, мы на втором этапе Дрифт ЮГ Мацури. 46ую собрать к сожалению не успели, но едем на 30ой элите и в этот раз вместе с Саней на его красивой е36
❤2🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2
ПАПА, Я ТОЖЕ ДРИФТЕР — документальный фильм Line UP о больших шагах пока ещё маленького человека. Арсений Цареградцев — по стопам отца, но по своей траектории. Начав путь пилота в 9 лет, Арсений уже уверенно дает бой взрослым и опытным дрифтерам. Аркадий Цареградцев — одна из главных фигур российского дрифта: пилот, чемпион и человек, чьё имя давно стало частью автоспортивной истории. Но в этом фильме он не главны…
❤2🔥1
Это мы Дмитрием Семенюком кайфово катнули
👍4
Награждение 🏆
🔥10❤3👏3
Итог таков😈
🔥8❤2👏2
Пару слов с Алексеем Голочаловым – эмоции от первой победы в квалификации!🤩
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sws_drift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SWS_DRIFT” (@sws_drift), 294 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sws_drift.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.