Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Barby๐Ÿ

Channel

Barby๐Ÿ

@sxcza7

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

3,905subscribers

+2,514 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003177573343
TypeChannel
Username@sxcza7
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sxcza7

Growth

1,3913,9052,6487 August 2026 โ€” 1,391 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 1,391 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 1,414 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 1,714 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 2,207 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 2,252 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 2,393 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 3,171 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 3,721 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 3,804 subscribers5 September 2026 โ€” 3,905 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +2,514. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 1,014โ€“4,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 02:183,905+101
1 Sept 2026, 07:373,804+83
29 Aug 2026, 15:163,721+550
26 Aug 2026, 08:463,171+778
23 Aug 2026, 10:132,393+141
19 Aug 2026, 11:372,252+45
16 Aug 2026, 21:542,207+493
13 Aug 2026, 04:071,714+300
10 Aug 2026, 11:551,414+23
7 Aug 2026, 12:231,391no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:321,391first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 2 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ916.4%
๐Ÿ‘916.4%
๐Ÿ‘Ž814.5%
๐ŸŒ610.9%
๐Ÿ‘Œ610.9%
๐Ÿ‘610.9%
๐Ÿ’”59.09%
โค47.27%
๐Ÿ”ฅ23.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC657 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ุงู‚ุชุจุงุณุงุช๐Ÿคโœจ

๐Ÿ‘Œ5๐Ÿ‘5โค4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ‘Ž4๐ŸŒ3๐Ÿ’”3๐Ÿ‘2

14 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC657 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ุงู„ู„ู‡ู‘ู… ุฃุฌุจูุฑู†ูŠ ุฌุจุฑู‹ุง ูŠูุนูˆุถู ู‚ู„ุจูŠ ุนู† ูƒูู„ ุดูŠุก.

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ‘Ž4๐Ÿ‘4๐ŸŒ3๐Ÿ’”2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

21 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTCโ‰ˆ2,340 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ู‡ุงูŠู„ุงูŠุช ุงู†ุณุชุง๐Ÿฉถโœจ

21 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTCโ‰ˆ2,370 viewsread 7 August 2026

ูˆุฑุจ ุงู„ู…ุณุชุญูŠู„ุงุช ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ู…ุณุชุญูŠู„ ู‚ุงุฏุฑ

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @sxcza7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œBarby๐Ÿโ€ (@sxcza7), 3,905 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sxcza7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.