Channel
@syapath
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-1,520 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001980077588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @syapath |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/syapath |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 3 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 1 | -1,514 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 1,515 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 1,518 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 1,522 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 1,523 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 1,523 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
gmgm any football fans here? World Cup enjoyers? I made 2 recaps today: 1. 🇧🇷Brazil vs. 🇯🇵Japan - TWEET 2. 🇩🇪Germany vs. 🇵🇾Paraguay - TWEET great read for those who didn’t watch the games. feel free to leave any feedback ❤️
❤3
Polymarket added their own referral program 😍 https://polymarket.com/?r=sya Welcome!
❤1
wow! something new.
❤9
posted some trading updates on X https://x.com/syanovee/status/2029948039167610978
❤2
oopsie! here we go again, axiom exposed
❤3
for anyone searching for a good wallets tracker, here’s the tool: > kreo.app/@syanovee if you want a TG bot access: > t.me/KreoPolyBot?start=ref-syanovee I’m already tracking some smart wallets here to make my trading path easier. btw, with Kreo you can copytrade me too 👀 for anyone who remember my Bloom copy-era, i think you’ll be happy to know this.
❤4
ah okey 🤡
❤5
You had 5 minutes to scoop some "NO" at a good price after OFFICIAL TRUMP STATEMENT. just track the news and be fast, that’s enough https://polymarket.com?via=sya
❤5
new market analysis and how it played out in a few hours https://x.com/syanovee/status/2013694473956446253
❤3
yoooo 🥹
❤7
turned out my thesis was clearly right 🙏🏻 Machado presented the prize to Trump on today’s meeting, Fox confirmed: > https://x.com/az_intel_/status/2011954190453456981 68c —> 100c, gg for anyone bidded with me I wasn’t patient enough, but honestly I’m glad with it. guess I’d panic sell during the silent hours after the meeting at 45-50c 👀 let’s keep cooking.
❤3
68c —> 75c (was at 86 in a few hours after I made the first post) Took P here, felt like something might not go as expected 🤷🏻♂️ Just decided not to risk here Trump & Machado meeting in ~2h
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @syapath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“syapath” (@syapath), 3 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syapath.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.