Channel
@synchrosuit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002000409907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @synchrosuit |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/synchrosuit |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 226 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 224 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 223 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 221 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 220 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 220 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
208 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 46.6% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 24.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 31 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.29% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 2.88% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.92% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.481% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.481% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.481% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня интервью Захара и Алины было бы не просто причесанное и приглаженное, но и практически залитое желатином для гладкости Если бы не Захар.. Он все же смог вставить свой комментарий , который дал однозначность понимания, на сколько это не настоящая история)) Аплодирую стоя!
❤🔥6🔥3❤1
Да, и вот ещё что, обязательно добавлю, потому что это, пожалуй, самое главное. Мы сейчас переживаем смену поколений — и это надо не оплакивать, а праздновать. Наши главные мужчины в синхронном плавании настолько разные, что их невозможно сравнивать, да и не нужно. Это как две вселенные, которые живут каждая по своим законам. У нас был Александр Мальцев — интеллигентный, тонкий, невероятно образованный, сдержанный. О…
❤4❤🔥4🔥4
Вчера почитала в разных сетях комментарии. Опять «великие» эксперты зашушукались — «как он смеет», «что он себе позволяет». Да блин, а вы на него посмотрите! Парню 19 лет, он вышел после выступления, где он прожил роль. Он был бандитом, хулиганом, он весь в шипах! Вы хотите, чтобы такой человек после такой работы вдруг заговорил как выпускник дипломатической академии? Это было бы фальшиво. Синхронное плавание десяти…
❤🔥7🔥3❤1
Два предыдущих дня задали жару. Такое нервное напряжение даже сказывается на точности рук. Сегодня много пришлось переделывать 🤦🏼♀️ Читаю комментарии, смотрю интервью, выступления.. Сколько злости вокруг Вчера зацепил разнос девчачьего дуэта в комментариях.. видите ли кому-то не понравились высунутые языки на тематическом фото в рокерском образе. Бред! Девчонки отрабатывали образ!! Потом гонения на интервью Заха…
❤🔥3🔥2
Шить для синхронного плавания это не только красивые ткани и стразики🤭 Вот это вот всё, как правило остаётся за кадром 🤫🥲 А это как раз именно то, что я нежно люблю и умею делать У меня еще в архивах есть изготовление шипов Захара и совершенно неземной коронки Алины, которую создавали в едином образе с купальником
❤9
Как и обещала..
❤8🔥7💋2
Весь мой очень тесный комьюнити телеграмма!! Давайте щедро засыпем лайками поддержки наш микст дуэт!! Переходите на канал Ганы Максимовой https://t.me/ganamaximova_school А я эксклюзивно для вас (только здесь) покажу внутрянку этой безумной коронки И даже могу снабдить ее историей возникновения 🫣
❤9
Video, posted without a caption
❤10🔥7💯1😁1😇1🆒1
Вы же тоже соскучились по Элечке? Я например жду не дождусь когда она вернется из отпуска 🙃
❤11
История возникновения новой оснастки #банданы
❤10🔥4❤🔥1
Это тоже синхронное плавание.. #банданы
👍7
День рождения в этот раз был самым замечательным и длиииииииииииииииииииннннннным #отпуск
❤8😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @synchrosuit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СинхроСтиль Synchrostyle” (@synchrosuit), 226 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/synchrosuit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.