Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Синтографист

Channel

Синтографист

@syntog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,124subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001754430932
TypeChannel
Username@syntog
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/syntog

Growth

1,1241,1451,134.57 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,141 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,124 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,121–1,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 19:381,124-2
30 Aug 2026, 12:331,126-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:371,128-5
24 Aug 2026, 13:321,133-3
20 Aug 2026, 11:511,136-1
17 Aug 2026, 12:481,137-4
14 Aug 2026, 01:541,141-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:451,142-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:511,145no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:021,145first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
541.7%
👌325.0%
👏216.7%
🔥216.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC27 viewsread 7 August 2026

ТЕЗИСНЫЙ КОНСПЕКТ И НАУЧНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ЛЕКЦИИ ЕВГЕНИИ ТИМОНОВОЙ «ТРУДНО БЫТЬ СОВРЕМЕННЫМ» Ссылка на Google doc https://youtu.be/kwt-nvfnWaI?si=TBlGyhKRx1OSIuQt

3 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC58 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Gemini создал конспект и анализ: Аналитическая редакция Основано на выступлении: Мо Гавдата (Mo Gawdat) — экс-бизнес-директора Google X, инженера и автора бестселлеров — на Gladiator Summit II. Мы привыкли воспринимать искусственный интеллект как очередной инструмент для бизнеса, ускорения работы или генерации картинок. Однако Мо Гавдат утверждает: ИИ — это не просто технологический сдвиг. Это событие, которое меняет

2 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Главные новости ИИ: Обновление Claude Opus 5, агенты в Buzz и прорыв в робототехнике Новая неделя в мире нейросетей принесла множество анонсов — от релизов крупных языковых моделей и инструментов виртуального мира до физического ИИ. ### 🤖 1. Claude Opus 5 и генерация игр * Релиз Claude Opus 5: Модель обошла прошлые версии по бенчмаркам и стала дешевле в использовании, однако пользователи отмечают снизившееся качес

1 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC30 viewsread 7 August 2026

Это видео представляет собой глубокое интервью с известным историком и философом Ювалем Ноем Харари под названием «Следующие 50 лет: человечество, ИИ, власть» (The next 50 years: humanity, AI, power). Ниже приведено описание основных идей из видео, дополнение к его мыслям и мое мнение по поводу услышанного. 📝 Описание: Основные идеи Харари из видео Харари рассуждает о том, что развитие искусственного интеллекта карди

1 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC50 viewsread 7 August 2026

ИИ не может существовать в отрыве от физической экономики. 🧠 Мое мнение На мой взгляд, Юваль Ной Харари поднимает критически важные, хотя местами слегка излишне драматизированные вопросы. С чем я полностью согласен: Его определение ИИ как «агента» абсолютно точно отражает реальность. Способность машин генерировать контент, писать код и анализировать данные действительно делает их активными участниками социальных проц

30 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @boris_again

https://odirouter.ai – один API-вход для 200+ AI-моделей. Для разработчиков в русскоязычном регионе это выглядит как довольно сильная мультимодальная библиотека моделей по цене / возможностям: текст, изображения, видео и мультимодальные сценарии доступны через один ключ. В одном месте можно смотреть и тестировать GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.5, Claude Fable 5, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, GPT Image 2, Seedance 2.0, Nan

2👏1

30 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

Видео на канале ФКН ВШЭ называется «Будущее ИИ: взгляд из индустрии». В нем обсуждается влияние генеративного искусственного интеллекта на IT-индустрию, образование и бизнес. 👤 Авторы и участники дискуссии: Евгений Соколов — ведущий дискуссии (преподаватель ФКН ВШЭ). Борис Цейтлин — CTO в стартапе Steabs.com, в прошлом Principal ML Engineer в eBay, автор Telegram-канала «Борис А5» и преподаватель магистратуры ИИ в ВШ

29 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026

О концепции Единой кодовой базы (Single Codebase) — архитектурном подходе, при котором мы пишем бизнес-логику и интерфейс ровно один раз, а система сама упаковывает этот код в веб-сайт, Android-приложение и iOS-приложение. Вот как объяснить эту концепцию команде и как правильно поставить рамки для AI-агентов, чтобы они не нарушили эту универсальность. ## 1. Пост для коллег: Как работает наша кроссплатформенная архит

29 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026

` ### Как давать агенту повседневные задачи в рамках этой архитектуры: Когда вы просите AI-агента создать новую фичу, формулируйте запрос так: > *"Создай новый компонент профиля пользователя. Учти правила кроссплатформенности из AGENTS.md: интерфейс должен корректно отступать от системных зон (Safe Areas) мобильных ОС, а логика сохранения настроек должна работать как в веб-версии, так и внутри Capacitor-контейнера."*

28 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Запуск автономных агентов в облачной песочнице (например, на box.ascii.dev) вместо локального ноутбука меняет логику расходов и использования ресурсов. Главное правило, которое нужно учитывать: стоимость составляет $0.036 в час, но платформа имеет минимальный порог оплаты в $20 в месяц. Это значит, что первые ~555 часов работы ваших виртуальных машин каждый месяц уже «предоплачены» этим минимальным платежом. Вот неск

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @syntog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нейросетевые покои: нейросети, ChatGPT, Midjourney
@neural_houses · 44,816
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
💎 Зерокодер | Нейросети и AI
@oqode · 39,542
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
SYNTX FAMILY
@syntxfamily · 324,783
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синтографист” (@syntog), 1,124 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syntog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.