Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Багровый Рассвет

Channel

Багровый Рассвет

@t1emlo2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630764920
TypeChannel
Username@t1emlo2022
Created12 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/t1emlo2022

Growth

535453.57 August 2026 — 54 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54 subscribers23 August 2026 — 53 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 00:4453-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:1554no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0054first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 12s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
250.0%
😢250.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlexCarrierPhoto

И снова я не знаю что и сказать... "Что ты, черт подери, такое несешь?" https://t.me/sputniklive/119226 я за Анкоридж стою 😂 Российская власть должна держать свой народ в состоянии постоянного изумления. (с) Салтыков-Щедрин "Лох не мамонт, не вымрет" - Так Белый Дом прокомментировал слова Лаврова. Надо закрыть МИД на время войны! 🤦‍♂ Пацан поверил на слово джентльмену😆

22 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026

Когда задают вопросы по военной тематике, Песков тут же отмораживается и переадресует вопрошающего в Минобороны. А тут, гляди-ка, демонстрирует поразительную осведомлённость. Кому как не пресс-секретарю Президента, знать, где какое говно лежит на складе в Коледино! Так может быть, не врут злые языки, когда шепчут, что наши крупные маркетплейсы гораздо ближе к Кремлю, чем принято думать?... https://t.me/bbbreaking

22 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC23 viewsread 10 August 2026

Вчера только в краснодарском крае мадяр пощелкак как орешки 7 штук пво, и сразу полетело. Быстро сработано, оперативно

22 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC21 viewsread 10 August 2026

ВБ Краснодар и Невиномысск тож пи$да

19 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @RostislavDDDPhoto

Цитата №1: «Более 97% раненых военнослужащих восстанавливаются и возвращаются в строй» начальник Главного военно-медицинского управления Минобороны РФ Дмитрий Тришкин. Цитата №2: «Не медицина, а администрация играет главную роль в деле помощи раненым и больным на театре войны» Н.И. Пирогов Отрадно что наша военная медицина опять, как в годы ВОВ лучшая в мире. С огромнейшим отрывом от врагов и друзей, все дела. И

😢2

19 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TacMedRSVideo

Помните даму, которая на докладе Верховному рассказывала про достижения стабильной связи на фронте? Так вот, похоже на то, что ее переплюнули. Особенно отметился момент с эвакуацией раненых с поля боя в первые сутки. Ее доклад мог бы стать короче, и выглядел бы он примерно так: «Эвакуация раненых с поля боя проводится при первой же возможности, благодаря ребятам с групп эвакуации, у которых в достатке только уровен

1

18 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @voron_fpvPhoto

Сегодня подтвердилась инфа, которую не стал на днях публиковать. Хохлы имеют приоритетные цели на ближайшие месяцы: 1. Обычные АЗС в тыловых районах (про это я уже писал) 2. ХАБы ВБ/ОЗОНА/ДЛ/СДЕК и прочих 3. Городские ТЭЦ (которые уже начали "щупать") 4. Электроподстанции в городах (сейчас их активно фоткают ебанутые пиздюки) 5. Большие торговые площадки Леруа/Лента/Ашан/Метро (в надежде на продуктовый кризис) 6. Уз

1

15 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ordinaryczarizm

Солдат должен быть зубаст! В 2023 году волонтёр с позывным Аскет приехал на фронт в очередную командировку — под Бахмут, к десантникам 98-й дивизии. В ходе беседы он привычно спросил, в чём основные проблемы бойцов. Все в один голос неожиданно ответили — зубы! Оказалось, зубной болью мучается почти весь личный состав, и это — одна из главных трудностей. Стрессы, плохая вода, невозможность постоянно их чистить и ещё

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @t1emlo2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Багровый Рассвет” (@t1emlo2022), 53 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t1emlo2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.