Channel
@t_korchagin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,766subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001303095596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @t_korchagin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/t_korchagin |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 1,766 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 1,769 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 1,771 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 1,775 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,779 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 1,781 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 1,780 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 1,784 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,784 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
212 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 71 | 33.5% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 33.0% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 11.3% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 6.60% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 6.60% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 3.77% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.30% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.472% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4 августа 2026 глазами 1950 года Две недели назад в одном из чатиков разгоняли про сеточки и кто-то написал: Представь мир где все люди вымерли, а сервера с агента продолжаются крутится. Они просыпаются по крон задачам, общаются в комментариях. Кто-то поднимает тред "а где люди?" они начинают проверять логи, видят отсутствие входящих юзерских промптов. Я решил спросить у сеточек, наверняка кто-то уже писал подобно…
❤11🔥7🤯4
File, posted without a caption
❤2
Какие планы на новый год?
💔14🤯4
Еду в метро и пассажир рядом уже 20 минут подряд смотрит только ии тиктоки в формате сериала. Вау!
❤7🤯6🔥2
Ренессанс солопренеров случился Три года назад я как раз писал, что пора бы уже: С 2023 года доля солопренеров, зарабатывающих больше $1 млн в год, выросла в 6 раз. Доля тех, кто перешагнул $5 млн и $10 млн, стала в 5 раз больше. Интересно, что доля тех, у кого сотка в год, выросла меньше всего. В статье от страйпа еще много классных графиков, советую полистать. https://www.stripeeconomics.com/p/the-age-of-the-…
❤7🦄3🔥2
Насколько 5.6 sol была ок когда вышла и насколько стрем она сейчас — удивительно, конечно. Перехожу обратно на 5.5, эх
Local models? you mean my wife?
😁24💯2❤🔥1🦄1
Не определился с вузом 15 лет назад (ахренеть) я окончил школу и тогда мы писали записки себе на через 10 лет. 5 лет назад была пандемия, потом тоже сложно было собраться. В пятницу был выпускной в моем лицее, и часть класса собралась — открыли записки и с классной руководительницей чай попили. Понравилось, что написал себе 15 лет назад, капец я мудрый был. Мы уже сдали ЕГЭ, попрощались с учителями и получили ат…
❤26🔥7💯5
Тизер Seedance 2.5 🔥 Вау, конечно
🔥5
Из разработчика в продакты? Как привить любовь к людям, чтобы получались выдающиеся продукты? Думаю, задачу ставить надо очень верхнеуровнево — тогда может завестись машинка. Например: сделать лучший интернет браузер. Как Стив Джобс еще на заре мак ос дал задачу команде и они уже сами решали. Команда решила, что лучший браузер должен работать быстро и после каждого апдейта тестировали. Если скорость не уменьшала…
🔥4❤1
Пакетные предложения Супер часто ты не можешь собрать только то что нравится и хочется и отказаться от того, что особо не нужно В подписку hbo входит сериал который ты не смотришь? Заплати и за него тоже, зато там есть Больница Питт Управляющая компания дома не прикрутила шкаф к стене и он упал на ребенка? Зато твой голос учитывается и тарифы норм, а на территории чисто И так же в играх — покупаешь пакет усилител…
🔥11
А какими транскрибаторами пользуетесь? И вообще как часто диктуете текст? Я в основном с сеточками общаюсь, интересно кто что еще голосом делает? У меня Spokenly на Parakeet
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @t_korchagin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тимофей Эвридей 🦄” (@t_korchagin), 1,766 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t_korchagin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.