https://t.me/atg43eqp/2614 #перваяпомощь #медицина

Channel
Военно-медицинская подготовка|
@tacmed_z
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,569subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001154097649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tacmed_z |
| Created | 11 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tacmed_z |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:58 | 12,569 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 12,570 | +1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:10 | 12,569 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:07 | 12,572 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:09 | 12,573 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 12,574 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 12,577 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 12,582 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 12,585 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 12,586 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:14 | 12,587 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:48 | 12,593 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 12,595 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 12,596 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 12,598 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 12,605 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:35 | 12,607 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 12,605 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:09 | 12,607 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 12,609 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.3%
- avg views ÷ 12,569 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,670
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.921%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (27 June 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 10,020 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 46m 14s
- Average length
- 9m 15s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
404 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 138 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 79 | 19.6% | |
| 🙏 | 66 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 7.18% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 6.68% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 4.95% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 2.72% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 2.48% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 2.48% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.99% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.495% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.248% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.248% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tacmed_z. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Наркотики в ОКСВА. Часть 1 Рассказ глубоко уважаемого подполковника медицинской службы ВВС, о его столкновение с наркотиками в Афганистане, в период службы там в 1982-1983 году на должности начальника медицинской службы 50-го авиационного смешанного авиаполка. Далее прямая речь офицера: «Возглавлял эту всю контору по доставке героина в Советский Союз из Афганистана главный терапевт сороковой армии, полковник Перум…
👍10❤5🤬4
Posted without readable text
❤8👍3🔥3
Шинирование конечности. Вот вам видео, где мужик стонет от того, что его тягают по квадрику, цепляя сломанную ногу. И вот почему он так стонет — прекрасно понимаем. А для тех, кто посмотрел и не понял, сейчас поясним. Перелом. В армии перелом не всегда бывает от того, что вы свои «грабли» ударили об броню машины или при занятии физической подготовкой. На войне перелом может быть как следствие прилёта осколка или пу…
👍21🔥2❤1
File, posted without a caption
👍5❤1
@warmempolit
😁19
Красная зона. Вот вам старое видео из Марьинки, как вытягивали бойца из красной зоны. И вот тут много говна. Для тех, кто не понял, сейчас поясним. Эвакуация. Началось всё более-менее адекватно. Раненого зацепили верёвкой и тянули. С одной стороны, способ рабочий, но если на бойце много снаряжения, то в городском бою он может зацепиться за выступающие части, мусор или куски арматуры в момент, когда его будут тянуть…
🤔10❤8🤝6👌1
Расскажу о своем опыте лечения и реабилитации. Часть 1 Как известно, в июле 2025 я получил минно-взрывное ранение, в результате которого была разрушена правая стопа и часть голени, которые в последствии были ампутированны на уровне средней трети правой голени. Начнем с первого дня в госпитале, сутки после ранения. Во время эвакуации и в результате ранения, у меня была значительная кровопотеря, в результате переливал…
🙏29🫡5🤯1
Если вы понимаете, что в 2027 году ничего не изменится, СВО не закончится и не начнется процесс увольнения, то держите инструкцию, как получить 40-105 дней отпуска. У командира разрешения спрашивать не надо. Запретить он не может. ❗️Что надо делать? Да просто РЕГИСТРИРУЕТЕСЬ В КАЧЕСТВЕ КАНДИДАТА НА ВЫБОРЫ!!! Это не так сложно, как кажется. В 2027 году выборы депутатов в России пройдут на нескольких уровнях. Основ…
❤14😁8🔥7
Антибиотики и их роль при ожидании эвакуации. Довольно часто, к сожалению, раненый сталкивается с проблемой эвакуации в мед учреждение. Представим ситуацию, что боец получил ранение, оказал самопомощь или ему помогли и начинается длительное ожидание. Первым делом важно контролировать место ранение, периодически проверять на кровопотерю и следить за общим состоянием. Мы ранее уже упоминали важность антибиотиков и здес…
🙏12🔥3❤2👍2
С рассветом, как только стало видно, что под ногами, прошли с саниструктором по тропе эвакуации проверить на отсутствие минирования. Новых "подарков" не было, но вражеский ФПВ заставил посидеть минут 15 в кустах. Через полчаса после возвращения на точку подошла эвакуация за трёхсотым. Пока выносили раненого из блиндажа принесли ещё одного. Весь посечённый осколками молодой парень лежал на окровавленных носилках. Пер…
🙏25👏20❤4👍4🔥1🫡1
Осмотр раненого. Вот вам видео, где у раненого ранение в поясницу и ранение головы. И всё. Ну разве так можно? Но повторение — мать учения. Сейчас расскажем, как мы бы делали в такой ситуации. Приступим. Делай раз. Осмотр проводится с головы к ногам. Для осмотра головы снимаем все головные уборы и осматриваем: лоб, темечко, затылок; смотрим в глаза и на зрачки (по зрачкам можно косвенно понять, есть у бойца ЧМТ или…
👍13❤8🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @tacmed_z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@naukapobezhdatZ · 51,6464 postsЦентр Сварог. ВМП и БД.
@center_svarog · 21,0733 postsТактика и специальная подготовка
@tactical_z · 66,3182 postsХИЛЕР l HEALER
@HealerTacMed · 130,3351 postkgv5mg
@KGV5mg · 1851 postСурвмед Survmed
@gksurvmed · 3741 postMilitary Managers🇷🇺
@militarymanagers · 9,4921 postОбщество Тактической Медицины
@rutacmed · 2,8571 postШкола Рэмбо☠
@super_rembo · 23,5981 postТоска Индейца
@toska_indeica · 3,2661 postW. M. P.
@warmempolit · 34,5671 post💥 Шпаргалка резервиста 🪖
@weareonourownland · 6,0281 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@naukapobezhdatZ · 51,6464 postskgv5mg
@KGV5mg · 1852 postsA.T.G.
@atg43eqp · 4,6051 postЦентр Сварог. ВМП и БД.
@center_svarog · 21,0731 postХРОНЫЧ
@chronoms · 7421 postХИЛЕР l HEALER
@HealerTacMed · 130,3351 postЛеший.онлайн
@leshyonline · 1,3261 postРАТНИК ТАКТИКАЛ
@ratnik_tactical_official · 10,1121 postПИСАРЬ ИЗ СПЕЦНАZА
@specnaz_com · 27,3231 postТактика и специальная подготовка
@tactical_z · 66,3181 postVIKING-GEAR - Тактическое снаряжение
@vikinggearonline · 5,6741 postVINDEX - ТАКТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКИПИРОВКА
@vindexpro · 3,1871 postW. M. P.
@warmempolit · 34,5671 postВ гостях у Дока
@ydoca · 19,1461 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@combattraining365 · 29,524
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 September 2026
@tactical_z · 66,318
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@tvtacticalmed · 23,173
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Военно-медицинская подготовка|” (@tacmed_z), 12,569 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tacmed_z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.