Channel
@taghizade_riazi10
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,790subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001899125619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taghizade_riazi10 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taghizade_riazi10 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 1,790 | -24 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 1,814 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 1,826 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 1,829 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 1,833 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 1,830 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:30 | 1,830 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 833 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
امشب تو پیجمون به چند تا سوالتون درباره ریاضی دارم جواب میدم، حتماً ببینید 📚✨ https://www.instagram.com/stories/taghizade_riazi/3977380824613359412?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsi=a3kzZ2x3cnJxZ2d4
بچه ها سلام چطورین ؟؟👋❤️
🔴 تست ترکیبی دنباله حسابی وهندسی✅ #دنباله_دهم #ریاضی_دهم ◀️ کانال آموزش ریاضی دهم و یازدهم 👇 @taghizade_riazi10
امروز دارم جزوه فصل دوم ریاضی یازدهم تجربی رو ویرایش میکنم 📚✏️ عجب جزوه ای شده جداً 🤩 خوش به حال اونی که تو دوره ی ……………یازدهم تجربی فیلمهای تدریس من از روی این جزوه رو ببینه 🎬
سلام بچه ها 👋 امروز عصر جواب تست دیشب رو براتون میفرستم 📨
یه تست ترکیبی خوب از دنباله هندسی و حسابی 📐 این تست از تستهای دوره نابغه ریاضی دهم خودم هست 🎓 ببین چه میکنی با حلش؟؟ 👀
تست امشب رو میخوام اول شما حل کنید بعد من 📝 👇👇👇👇👇👇
سلام سلام
حتما روزهای دیگه هم تستهای مباحث دیگه رو براتون حل میکنم
🔴 ترکیب تابع همانی وثابت وانتقال تابع ✅ #تابع_دهم #ریاضی_یازدهم ◀️ کانال آموزش ریاضی دهم و یازدهم 👇 @taghizade_riazi10
اینم تست تابع دهم که قولش رو بهتون داده بودم👇
امروز میریم سراغ یه تست خوب از تابع
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taghizade_riazi10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چی باشه؟؟؟؟
The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
حالا تو بگو دو پی سوم که آخر ویدئو قبلی بود میشه چند درجه؟
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش ریاضی پایه دهم و یازدهم (ریاضی وتجربی) | تقی زاده” (@taghizade_riazi10), 1,790 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taghizade_riazi10.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.