Channel
@talairan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,352subscribers
-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001168139845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talairan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talairan |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 4,352 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 4,357 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 4,355 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 4,358 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 4,363 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 4,366 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 4,370 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 4,373 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 4,371 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 4,370 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 4,381 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 4,389 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 4,392 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 4,391 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 4,391 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
199 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 108 | 54.3% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 13.1% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 12.6% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 6.03% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 4.52% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 3.02% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.51% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.01% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.51% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.503% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این پرونده تمام شد. من دیگه باید برم استراحت. و تکمیل برنامه ها و آماده شدن برای فصل جدید روند ها و پرداخت به آموزش های شخصیمون و معاملات. دیگه شاید مدتی نباشیم خدمت عزیزان. خدانگهدار.
❤22😭12
انس طلا در آستانه خروج از مثلث قیمتی لحظاتی حساس در تمامی مارکت ها
🔥5👍4😱1
نفت برید روی خرید... از این لحظه به بعد پله ای ورود کنید نفت رو.... خرید کانال ۷۰ به حد ضرر ۶۰ به هدف تارگت اول ۱۲۰ دلار والسلام.
👍13❤3👎1
نفت هم در کانال ۷۷ دلاری
صبح بخیر یه حرکت جذاب بعد از رویت عدد به صورت مویی، انس طلا نه تنها تارگت رو زد بلکه اکنون در ۴۱۲۸ سکونت کرد.
❤7
ادعای آکسیوس از توافق احتمالی برای تنگه هرمز: این توافق، ترتیبات موقت بین عمان و ایران در تنگه هرمز را به مدت ۶۰ روز و قابل تمدید، پیشبینی میکند 🔹طبق این توافق، تمام کشتیهایی که از طریق تنگه هرمز به خلیج فارس میآیند، مسیر شمالی را از طریق آبهای ایران طی خواهند کرد. 🔹کشتیهایی که از طریق تنگه هرمز به سمت دریای عرب حرکت میکنند، با هماهنگی ایران، مسیر جنوبی خود را از طریق آبهای عمان طی خواهند کرد. 🔹توافق تصریح م…
😁3❤1
آکسیوس در مورد توافق جدید برای تنگه هرمز مدعی شد: این توافق تصریح میکند که طرفین ظرف ۳۰ روز برای پاکسازی مینهای دریایی از کانال مرکزی تنگه تلاش خواهند کرد 🔹بر اساس توافق دائمی که بین عمان و ایران در حال مذاکره است، از خط میانی تنگه برای ورود و خروج کشتیها استفاده خواهد شد. 🔹در روزهای اخیر شاهد تماسهای تلفنی بین استیو ویتکاف و وزرای امور خارجه ایران و عمان بودهایم. 💡💡 @Khabar_Fouri
#فوری | ادعای اکسیوس به نقل از منابع آگاه: عراقچی با توافق به صورت اصولی موافقت کرد که این توافق نیازمند موافقت رهبر معظم انقلاب و شورای عالی امنیت ملی است /خبرهای فوری مهم 💡💡 @Khabar_Fouri
😁3
آمادهسازی یادداشت تفاهم جدید در تنگه هرمز 🔹خبرنگار المیادین در اسلامآباد به نقل از منابع اعلام کرد که در حال آمادهسازی یک یادداشت تفاهم دوم هستیم که به عنوان پیوست به یادداشت تفاهم اول خواهد بود و تنها به تنگه هرمز محدود میشود./خبرهای فوری مهم 💡💡@Khabar_Fouri
😁3🤔1
خبری که ترامپ دقایقی پیش در صفحه تروث سوشال خودش بازنشر کرد: ترامپ: «توافق در آستانه نهایی شدن است» / انتخاب 🆔 @Entekhab_ir
❤4👎4🤔1
در جهانی که برخی کشورها مثل حیوانات با هم در گلاویز اند و ایدئولوژی های باستانی و تعاریف خودخوانده از دین و خدا و رسالت ها مایه عذاب ملت های خودشان و دیگر ملت ها شده و انسان به اسارت حکومت های آرمانگرا و رادیکال های یهودی و مسلمان گرفتار آمده؛ تو عمان باش. مسلمان، آرام، میانجی، صلح طلب و عزتمند در حال توسعه و مرفه که کرامت مردمش و آرامش سرزمینش در دل آتشفشانی ترین نقطه جهان را بر هر سیاستی ترجیح می دهد .
❤22👎11👍7
یه مثال واسه 3RD الان رفتم طلا رو دیدم دقیقا یکی توش هست. منم گذاشتم واسه یه نوسان احتمالی. اگر اصلاحی داد، میاد که این ناحیه رو تاچ کنه
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @talairan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طلا ایران(تکنیکال فاندامنتال)” (@talairan), 4,352 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talairan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.