27 measurements spanning 31 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,758–13,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 21:57
13,784
+16
4 Sept 2026, 08:01
13,768
-10
2 Sept 2026, 21:04
13,778
-5
1 Sept 2026, 16:23
13,783
+2
31 Aug 2026, 17:06
13,781
-7
30 Aug 2026, 18:57
13,788
-7
29 Aug 2026, 17:38
13,795
-8
28 Aug 2026, 15:08
13,803
+3
27 Aug 2026, 15:07
13,800
-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:36
13,802
-6
25 Aug 2026, 17:54
13,808
-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:28
13,810
-9
21 Aug 2026, 12:07
13,819
-5
20 Aug 2026, 12:47
13,824
-11
19 Aug 2026, 10:36
13,835
+3
18 Aug 2026, 10:57
13,832
+11
17 Aug 2026, 12:26
13,821
-8
16 Aug 2026, 04:36
13,829
+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:55
13,825
+12
13 Aug 2026, 04:33
13,813
first reading
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.00%
avg views ÷ 13,784 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 154 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
154 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
157,109
Reactions total
2,227
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 57s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,040 reactions across 153 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,166
38.4%
👍
515
16.9%
🔥
447
14.7%
😁
206
6.78%
👏
114
3.75%
🤡
107
3.52%
💯
72
2.37%
🤣
58
1.91%
😢
43
1.41%
🥰
35
1.15%
🎉
34
1.12%
🙏
33
1.09%
❤🔥
31
1.02%
🤬
28
0.921%
🤯
20
0.658%
😍
19
0.625%
😱
17
0.559%
🤔
15
0.493%
🥱
13
0.428%
🥴
12
0.395%
19 further kinds
55
1.81%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,040 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Здравствуйте, Наталия
Вот и мои "вести с полей"
Пока не вступил в силу строгий договор - "ничего никуда с площадки не выносить и не выкладывать" , спешу прислать Вам весточку, чтобы поблагодарить за поддержку и советы верить в себя. И уважать себя.
Второй вот прямо перевернул мою кино жизнь, как говориться- "обратно - на ноги")))
Спасибо Вам дорогая🧡
Здравствуйте Наталья!
🏴☠️ «ГОГИ КРАСНАЯ БОРОДА» | Комедийный актёрский этюд
Яндекс Диск
🎬 YouTube
▶️ VK Видео
▶️ RuTube
⸻
Ещё один персонаж из моего эксперимента со 100 актёрскими этюдами.
Гоги Красная Борода — гроза морей, только вот его пиратский арсенал немного необычный. 😄
Уже, наверное, можно выложить рекламный ролик, в котором мы снялись с @tss1974, @kris_pie Так как "права закончились". Или как там правильно говорить?)
Виктория Исакова и Сергей Гилёв в новом сезоне «Фишера»! Раскрываем весь каст четвертого сезона ⭐️
В Москве вовсю идут съемки детективного триллера «Фишер. Черный проспект» от режиссеров и шоураннеров первого сезона Сергея Тарамаева и Любови Львовой.
⠀
Главные роли в новом сезоне исполнят Евгений Цыганов и Оливер Рэймонд Мара. К звездному актерскому составу также присоединились Виктория Исакова и Сергей Гилёв, а так…
Срочный каст
Ратмир -кавказский дерзкий мальчишка 13-15 лет, смелый, обаятельный, с характером. Работает курьером на самокате, но мечтает о большой сцене.
Фото, ФИО, рост, возраст, ссылку на Визитку под постом
Есть у нас такие ?
Наташенька, добрый вечер! Сегодня у меня был крайний день на проекте! Спасибо Вам огромное ещё раз 🌹🌹🌹 Немножко грустно, что проект закончился, ну как знать может будет что-то ещё интересное!
P.S.Вам на память-дядя Вова и тетя Маша
👍18❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @talentSocial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кастинги в кино | Анна Денисова и Ася Аристова 🎥 @DenisovaAristovaCasting · 32,396 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
gogotova_casting @gogotovacasting · 31,352 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Кастинги Гильдии кастинг-директоров @castgcd · 33,540 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Кастинги Спб @castingspb · 33,813 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Кастинги Москвы @casting_msk · 34,814 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
КАСТИНГИ @kastingi3 · 84,169 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
ТОП Кастинги от Дени Актеры/Модели/Зрители в шоу/АМС Москва (Клипы/Реклама/Кино/Шоу в ТВ) @top_kasting · 31,589 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Детские кастинги Москвы @kidscastingmsk · 29,485 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
КАСТИНГИ | от Софии @tfp_commerce · 32,071 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
Event hunter - вся творческая работа Москва @mskeventjob · 49,960 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
КАСТИНГИ ДЛЯ ДЕТЕЙ @kasting_deti_spb_moskow · 33,353 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Кастинги в Москве @castings · 63,564 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Кастинги Москва @Kastingi7 · 214,762 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
КАСТИНГИ МОСКВА 🎥🎞📸 @kastingiD · 92,346 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Кастинги Москва @kastingi2 · 96,308 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Новости кинопроизводства @filmres · 37,270 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Актерская Соцсеть” (@talentSocial), 13,784 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talentSocial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.