Channel
@tangguo978
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+97 since we began measuring on 14 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004430368541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tangguo978 |
| Created | 12 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tangguo978 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 136 | +93 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 43 | +4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 39 | no change |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 39 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 12 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (12 October 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,173 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️云南昆明司机加油站报告❤️ 9分以上为优质，8分以上为中等，7分以下为差超过2次下架黑榜处理！ 【时间】：2026-10-14 【老师】： 小糖果 【评价人】：蟑螂恶霸PLUS 【人照】：9 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】：9.8 【服务】：9.8 【态度】：9.8 【环境】：9.2 【综合评分】:9.52 【过程描述】：到昆明出差完事就看见新老师上榜，马上就来兴趣了，立马联系老师出击，到地方遥控上楼一看，小小一只，颜值身材都长到我的审美上了，是我喜欢的类型，很后悔时间紧没买战袍，交了水费之后，残废澡搞起来，上床之后二弟早已饥渴难耐，但是老师还有服务呢，毒龙很爽，口没有齿感，口这点得夸一下，口了快5分钟，几次差点交代了，立马翻身带套开搞，这个就真的爽了，老师下面紧，日感真的太好了，我一个可以半个多小时的人，到这还是123直接没了，完事都没聊天，老师帮洗完之后只能害羞的掩面而逃，这里说一下，服务确实好，下次再来还会继续回锅。
❤1
❤️云南昆明司机加油站报告❤️ 9分以上为优质，8分以上为中等，7分以下为差超过2次下架黑榜处理！ 【时间】：2026-10-14 【老师】： 小糖果 【评价人】：匿名用户 【人照】：9.5 【颜值】:9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9.5 【态度】：9 【环境】：9 【综合评分】:9.17 【过程描述】：没事干联系了新人老师，刚好老师有空，小区停车很方便。又欲又甜的类型，交了水费，就拉着老师进去洗澡，帮洗帮擦👍🏻。上床开始服务，冰火来一遍，老师口活无齿感，酥酥麻麻的感觉一阵一阵的。毒龙也是一绝，受不了了赶紧带套开干，女上位很有活力，我喜欢后入，老师会配合着扭腰非常爽，我每一次抽搐都有回应，一边抽插一边抱紧，干了一会儿出水，太爽啦！完事还有陪洗，体验很好。
已测😉你好我好才是真的好😝 @tangguo233
云南昆明司机加油站新人榜 🙋🏻♀️ 小糖果 #km1082 📊 车评： https://t.me/Kmainu95/4501 ☎️ 联系方式： @tangguo233 🏷 分类标签： #昆明 #官渡 #6P #11PP #嫩妹 #毒龙 #无套口 #过水漫游 #足交 #冰火 #陪浴 #丝袜 ✳️ https://t.me/Kmainu95111
❤1
频道：https://t.me/tangguo978 双向：@tangguo741_bot 私信：@tangguo233
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tangguo978. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小糖果的朋友圈” (@tangguo978), 136 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tangguo978.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.