Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Таня предпринимает

Channel

Таня предпринимает

@tanya_undertakes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,380subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670007133
TypeChannel
Username@tanya_undertakes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanya_undertakes

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3801,3931,386.56 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,392 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,393 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,387 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,386 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,385 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,382 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,380 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,378–1,395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:001,380-2
13 Sept 2026, 14:411,382-3
9 Sept 2026, 15:401,385-1
4 Sept 2026, 18:211,386-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:051,387-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:321,389-4
23 Aug 2026, 05:231,393+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:171,392+1
16 Aug 2026, 14:361,391+2
12 Aug 2026, 22:031,389-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:211,390-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:301,391no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:031,391first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18463.4%
🔥7325.2%
👏103.45%
😁82.76%
❤‍🔥72.41%
😱72.41%
💔10.345%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tanya_undertakes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
693
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
551
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvwxQVt18 April 20268 April 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC282 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

уже полгода, даже немного больше, у меня всё как-то стремительно меняется я даже перестала особо проявляться и делиться тем, что присходит у меня в жизни и проектах а это вообще верный признак что меня вертолётит — если я не пишу вдохновляющие меня саму посты про то, что я делаю и чем живу так что держите пока мем, на нём изображена я, а про дела мои я в скором времени расскажу!

❤21🔥5😱2

18 May 2026, 19:30 UTC696 views40 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хочется сохранить тут эти сториз, в качестве засечки — насколько же широко поле возможностей. В последнее время было несколько таких опытов, когда я не планировала особых результатов, но они вдруг случались. Уверена, мне очень помогло то, что я допускала возможность успеха и благодаря этому откликалась, вовремя реагировала, совершала необходимые действия. Вот это видео я же я почему-то сделала! И выложила, хотя бы…

❤25🔥12👏3

9 May 2026, 12:35 UTC684 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Готовлю к запуску новый медиа проект, и начинаю искать человека, с которым будем делать контент: вести соцсети, писать тексты. Интерес к научпоп / longevity / биохакинг будет плюсом! Откликаться или рекомендовать можно мне в личку: @yanatg пишите, всё расскажу 💚

❤12🔥9

30 Apr 2026, 07:09 UTC743 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«найти своих и успокоиться» — ни в коем случае. Я не хочу находить своих и успокаиваться — если я нахожу своих, я хочу быть ещё х3 более активной, создавать больше, думать шире, пропускать через себя вселенские потоки энергии. Фраза ужасно набила оскомину, пожалуйста все перестаньте её использовать, это креативный ред флаг, спасибо.

❤15

29 Apr 2026, 11:22 UTC662 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Апдейт по ежедневной рутине В ноябре писала про клюшку падения фокуса и что мне помогает эффективно работать. Медитации, холодный душ, книжки утром и вечером… Давайте посмотрим что от этого осталось. 🌟 Спустя 5 месяцев я всё ещё встаю рано и пью чай по утрам, остальное по ситуации. Основная метрика, на которую я ориентируюсь сейчас — внутреннее спокойствие. Прослушала кучу лекций про то, как работает стресс и как о…

❤11🔥5

27 Apr 2026, 19:12 UTC551 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я почти перестала следить за теми, кто делает что-то похожее на то, что делаю я, или (особенно!) что я хочу сделать. Во-первых, потому что бесят. Делают быстрее, делают прикольно. Отвратительно. Во-вторых, мозг сразу впадает в тревогу и перестаёт творчески мыслить. Внимание рассеивается и переключается в режим копирования, ничего «своего», уникального и крутого в таком состоянии невозможно придумать. Я чувствую, чт…

❤34🔥8👏2

20 Apr 2026, 08:03 UTC555 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

псс завтра у нас в Epic Growth будет продуктовый мастермайнд про управление изменениями — могу только сказать, что это скорее всего последний офлайн ивент Epic growth в таком виде, каким вы его знаете скоро что-нибудь поменяем, так что приходите ) 🔥 регистрация тут PS. а сегодня ещё у нас будет открытый эфир от Оли Ковалёвой @builtbyolly про то, как она завайбкодила международную конференцию — пройдёт на YouTube, …

❤8🔥2👏1

8 Apr 2026, 14:43 UTC693 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvwxQVt

Чему учиться чтобы быть классным руководителем? По моему опыту оценка компетенций (а значит и грейдов, и зарплаты) — это самые болезненные вопросы в командах, и на них обычно забивают. Но я постоянно исследую этот вопрос как человек, который делает образование для руководителей и который сам руководит командами и хочет развиваться. Основные компетенции можно разделить на два кластера: БАЗА и АКТУАЛОЧКА: 🔵 База — …

🔥5❤4👏2😱1

5 Apr 2026, 18:37 UTC497 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ещё одно мнение про искусство, которого вы не просили. Авторы, ИИ и маркетинг. Я вижу, как бренды всё чаще выпячивают делают акцент на том, что сотрудничают с живыми художниками, а не используют ИИ для креативов, рекламы и тд. То есть, если раньше достаточно было нарисовать классную анимацию, то сейчас становится важно ещё сопроводить её сторителом про то, что это human-made, или наоборот, что это потрясающе крутая…

❤10👏1🔥1

1 Apr 2026, 16:13 UTC519 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

После постов про картины Гарри Зуха, кажется все подумали, что я теперь галеристка и зарабатываю продажей искусства. Давайте на всякий случай синхронизируемся: я управленец, продюсер и предприниматель. Развиваю бренд @kharitonovsci, создала сообщество биохакеров и конечно же я CEO Epic Growth. Я никогда не занималась искусством как бизнесом, т.к. это СЛОЖНО. Сложнее, чем продукты, для которых можно сформулировать ц…

❤9🔥8❤‍🔥4👏1💔1

30 Mar 2026, 19:15 UTC435 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

иронично отмечу, что у меня рефлексия за потоком опыта не поспевает

❤14😁8

24 Mar 2026, 15:38 UTC555 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Собрала картины отца в каталог. Вот он: https://garryzooh-gallery.lovable.app/ Мой спонтанный рилс залетел на 52k+ в инстаграме, и всю неделю люди мне пишут про картины, спрашивают как купить, предлагают коллабы. А у меня и каталога не было! Даже не все работы были отфотканы. Залетевшее видео я снимала посреди генеральной уборки, на эмоциях от того, что моя квартира заставлена искусством… И я очень благодарна тому…

❤15🔥9😱4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tanya_undertakes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таня предпринимает” (@tanya_undertakes), 1,380 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanya_undertakes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.