Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,338–7,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 03:38
7,447
-1
2 Nov 2026, 13:10
7,448
+9
30 Oct 2026, 11:49
7,439
+26
27 Oct 2026, 19:00
7,413
+1
25 Oct 2026, 03:41
7,412
-1
21 Oct 2026, 23:20
7,413
+6
18 Oct 2026, 20:38
7,407
-5
15 Oct 2026, 16:16
7,412
+3
12 Oct 2026, 07:16
7,409
+18
5 Oct 2026, 06:22
7,391
+5
26 Sept 2026, 14:22
7,386
+5
17 Sept 2026, 23:36
7,381
+7
14 Sept 2026, 03:19
7,374
+6
10 Sept 2026, 11:55
7,368
+4
4 Sept 2026, 21:01
7,364
+11
1 Sept 2026, 09:24
7,353
-1
29 Aug 2026, 09:53
7,354
-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:03
7,355
+1
19 Aug 2026, 21:56
7,354
-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:12
7,356
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.6%
avg views ÷ 7,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,770
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
67 (21 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
82,940
Reactions total
4,968
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
513
Videos
58
Links
204
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,312 reactions across 64 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,026
45.3%
😁
2,818
21.2%
👍
1,708
12.8%
🔥
1,699
12.8%
💔
736
5.53%
😢
323
2.43%
👎
2
0.015%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Несколько раз уже в последнее время поднималась тема катастрофы в Алешках (Олешках), онлайн и оффлайн, и почему люди не выехали, когда была возможность. На объяснения, почему, часто смотрели недоверчиво. Причем более-менее понятно, когда говоришь про отсутствие сил и ресурсов. А вот если заикнуться про животных, которых не могли оставить на верную смерть, ну такое. Тем не менее этих гуманистов - любого возраста, пола…
К постоянному спору, кто из самодержцев в известной байке все-таки сказал: "А мужику передайте, что и я на него плевал" - Николай Палыч или Александр III. Смотрю, опять народ сцепился. Щас я вас рассужу.
Первая книжка с этой историей вышла еще в 1886-м, некий Л. Кинг собрал. Жаль, что концовка, с привкусом швейковских анекдотов, потерялась при дальнейших пересказах, без нее не то.
...Припоминается мне и еще пример л…
Как все же непросто с молодежью. Друзья попросили окучить удаленно ребенка на предмет истории Петербурга, конкретно - Васильевский остров, живут они там. Устно, без похода. Мальчишка милый, телефончик свой героически отложил. Слушает, вникает. Показываю картинки, тычу курсором вокруг Двенадцати коллегий, объясняю, что как размещалось. Вдруг дитя восторженно гогочет, буквально на пустом месте. Ну площадь, ну Коллежска…
А вот, братцы, кому я в Графском у дома Достоевского нарассказывала бочку арестантов, там ведь несколько лет назад была, кроме доски Федор Михалыча, еще такая чудесная поэту Аронзону. Но декламировать еще и его, до кучи к прочим, мне совесть не велит, вам и так тяжко приходится. Кстати, он поменял адрес, как и Александр Моисеич Володин, в том же 1967 году. Оба уехали подальше. Чего это, думаю, они. А! Так это ж я род…
На дамском форуме девы обсуждают лекарства от молочницы.
"В первые дни применения этих свечей у вас не было жжения? Или это просто те жалуются, кто неправильно вставляет? (ставит) Сорри, а как прально говорить??? У меня такое впервые, даже и не знаю как выговорить".
Я тут же вспомнила про даму из губермановских "Пожилых записок", которая стеснялась говорить "хрен" и вместо этого называла его "хрон". А услышав за ст…
На горе в черногорских ебенях пренеприятное известие - к ним едет ревизор. Муж растерянно бродит по дому, пытаясь сообразить, где навести чистоту, чтобы нагрянувшая жена не начала орать как потерпевшая. Жена тем временем уже разрабатывает голосовые связки, поскольку эта компания - муж с котами живут беспечально и без лишней суеты. А вообще, после чтения "Жизнь Антона Чехова", напичканной не только шелухой лишних подр…
Для фанатов Тохи Сундукяна-Мариупольского. Хозяйка говорит, со страшной силой полюбил душевую кабину.
Сидит там и вылезать не желает.
А мне на память остались драные штаны.
Дочкину фразу "Мама, перестань думать, что все всё знают" надо распечатать наконец и повесить над столом, рядом с каноничной "Таня, иди работай". Ну не могут люди всё знать, Таня, отвяжись. И иди работай, да.
Но я человек нудный и извожу экскурсантов призывами посмотреть то и почитать сё. Самое удивительное, что многие смотрят и читают. Видимо, предположив, что иначе я буду являться к ним ночами в чепце германновск…
😁91❤44👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @tanyamaycom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лиля Ким | Сторителлинг и блог @lilia_kim_story · 23,144 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
Беляков @bellochkin · 29,255 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
Всё как у зверей / радио Тимонова @timonova · 20,465 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
Кот Шрёдингера @kot_sh · 25,274 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Евдокимова, Нинель Морицевна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…(издательство)|издательстве «Мир»]]{{cite web |url=https://t.me/tanyamaycom/153 |title=Забыла однажды в закоулках после экскурсии… |author=Татьяна…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Татьяна Мэй” (@tanyamaycom), 7,447 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanyamaycom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.