Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for полурестㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗺。

Channel

полурестㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗺。

@taphkk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004279136686
TypeChannel
Username@taphkk
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 9 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/taphkk

Growth

24282610 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25 subscribers2510 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:4125-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:4926-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:1327-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:0328+4
11 Aug 2026, 11:0424no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:3024first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54225296773087565682144.7%
custom 5422386453034339572612.8%
custom 5422631137321191506612.8%
custom 5291940908911073468510.6%
custom 531927223394687231636.38%
custom 532794797769048265324.26%
custom 542233888627153741324.26%
custom 529195914963718121612.13%
custom 545614904921424906012.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC26 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ㅤㅤ иногда я надолго задерживаю взгляд на стенах. в пятнах сырости, пыли и плесени постоянно появляются какие-то узоры. где-то я вижу глаза, где - то — почти целое лицо , кривое и расплывчатое,будто его стерли до того , как оно успело появиться. это... может быть иногда вправду занимательным.. хотя,возможно, от скуки начинаю видеть смысл там, где его нет . хоть как-то отвлекает. ㅤㅤ─── 05 .

custom 53192722339468723163custom 53279479776904826532custom 54561490492142490601

5 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

ㅤразноцветные пятна умиляют меня.

22 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ㅤㅤ рыбы мандаринки практически не умеют плавать – они предпочитают... ходить пешком ! ! они медленно перебирают своими нижними плавниками по дну , из - за чего выглядят как крошечный, безумно яркий голубь, который очень важно и суетливо шагает по своим делам . ㅤㅤ─── 22 . 07ㅤㅤ

custom 54225296773087565685custom 54223864530343395721custom 54226311373211915061

12 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC81 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @FORSAKENKK

⭐⭐ Ой-ой-ой 🔤 Связь Тафа стала значительно хуже, а значит, он уходит в активность наполовину на неопределенный срок! 😱 😻 #halfrest_FKK

custom 54226311373211915062custom 54223864530343395721custom 54225296773087565681

11 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ* * * ㅤㅤ11 . 07 . 2026 ───────── ㅤ? ... что ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────🤩🤩 🔤 — А ты реально из этих 👨‍❤️‍👨? неанон – Шедлетский

custom 54223864530343395722

14 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC158 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ* * * ㅤㅤ13 . 06 . 2026 ───────── ㅤв голове всплывает какая-то полная ерунда. ... Например, брауни! просто кусок шоколадного пирога. я точно помню, что когда-то давно мне это очень нравилось. но сейчас... вкус почти полностью стерся из памяти. пытаюсь его воссоздать в мыслях, а чувствую только какую-то невнятную, смазанную сладость, которая тут же перебивается привычным привкусом пыли и пороха. слиш

custom 54225296773087565684

14 Jun 2026, 06:38 UTC133 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54225296773087565683custom 52919591496371812161

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taphkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“полурестㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗺。” (@taphkk), 25 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taphkk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.