Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 87 days, net -720. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,087–17,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 19:56
16,195
-6
1 Nov 2026, 21:39
16,201
-18
31 Oct 2026, 20:58
16,219
-16
30 Oct 2026, 22:16
16,235
-23
29 Oct 2026, 23:16
16,258
-3
29 Oct 2026, 00:51
16,261
-14
27 Oct 2026, 23:47
16,275
-15
26 Oct 2026, 21:14
16,290
-16
25 Oct 2026, 22:21
16,306
-17
25 Oct 2026, 00:37
16,323
-19
23 Oct 2026, 22:40
16,342
-16
22 Oct 2026, 22:46
16,358
-4
21 Oct 2026, 20:55
16,362
-12
20 Oct 2026, 13:46
16,374
-12
19 Oct 2026, 13:16
16,386
-8
18 Oct 2026, 10:28
16,394
-1
17 Oct 2026, 09:06
16,395
-9
16 Oct 2026, 06:07
16,404
-2
15 Oct 2026, 06:08
16,406
-5
14 Oct 2026, 05:27
16,411
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 16,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
63 (5 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
6,670
Reactions total
80
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 03:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,600
Videos
≈1,740
Links
≈710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
759 reactions across 58 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
320
42.2%
🔥
173
22.8%
🤝
58
7.64%
💯
48
6.32%
👍
35
4.61%
⚡
20
2.64%
💘
20
2.64%
😐
16
2.11%
🕊
13
1.71%
🙏
9
1.19%
❤🔥
8
1.05%
✍
6
0.791%
🎅
5
0.659%
🤩
5
0.659%
🍾
4
0.527%
👀
4
0.527%
💅
4
0.527%
🥴
4
0.527%
🤷♂
2
0.264%
🌚
1
0.132%
4 further kinds
4
0.527%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 63 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @taqwastore1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 Наши долгожданные костюмы приехали!
Количество ограничено, а цены просто 🔥
💰 Цена со скидкой — 3 490 ₽
Сейчас мои фотки будут везде, по-любому 😂 Но вы знаете, у кого брать ❤️
Размер подберём по росту и весу!
Успевайте, костюмов немного!
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
Братья, эти бомбочки многие ждали 🔥😍
Наконец-то получили, но количество ограничено!
💰 Цена со скидкой — 3 790 ₽
Размеры: 38–44
🔥 Оставь реакцию и получи дополнительную скидку 200 ₽!
Кто успел — тот забрал!
Получили костюмы двойки от HERMES
Размеры:M LXL XXL
качество :шикарное🔥
Цена:2990₽
👉🏻размер подберём индивидуально по росту и весу
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
Базовая мужская ветровка — 3 290 ₽
Лёгкий водоотталкивающий нейлон. Размер подберём индивидуально по росту и весу.
🇨🇳 Отправка из Китая
📦 Доставка: 15–20 дней
💰 Цена: 3 290 ₽
Сейчас нахожусь в Китае, поэтому могу предложить хорошую цену. В магазинах подобные модели
стоят от 6 000 ₽.
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
ГОТОВЫЕ ОБРАЗЫ 😍(всё что на фото можно купить отдельно✨
•костюм 6000₽
• свитшот Stone Island 4000₽
•Комбат Stone Island 2800₽
•Кофта Louis Vuitton 2200₽
👉🏻размер подберём индивидуально по росту и весу
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
Братья, кто спрашивал такие кардиганы — нашёл для вас 🔥
Отправка напрямую из Китая 🇨🇳
Качество — премиум ✅
Доставка — 15–20 дней.
Кому надо — заказывайте, всё сделаем как надо 🤝
Цена кардигана — всего 3 500 ₽ 🔥
Такие кардиганы 7000₽-8000₽
сложно найти. Я нашёл в Китае хорошего поставщика и буду закупать большими партиями, поэтому могу давать такие цены.
Качество отличное, цена — максимально выгодная 🤝
Менеджер …
В Дагестане такие джинсы продаются за 4500–5000 ₽.
Я сейчас нахожусь в Китае 🇨🇳 и могу найти практически любой товар, который вам нужен.
🔥 Цена этих джинсов — всего 1850₽
📦 Доставка — 15–20 дней.
Кому интересно — пишите ⤵️
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
Братья, очень многие писали насчёт этих тапочек (чешек).
Сейчас я нахожусь в Китае, поэтому могу оформить их всего за 1 990 ₽. В России, как мне сказали, они стоят около 4 500 ₽.
Есть большой спрос, но найдём для вас любой размер. Отправка напрямую из Китая, доставка примерно 15–20 дней.
Также можно взять в подарок тем, кто собирается на умру — полезный и хороший подарок.
Кто хочет заказать — напишите мне, всё оф…
Новая коллекция😍
•зипка 2800₽
•джинсы 2300₽
•футболка 2000₽
•обувь 3000-4500₽
•кепка 1500₽
•барсетка 2000₽
👉🏻размер подберём индивидуально по росту и весу
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
Мужской вязаный свитер.
Зимний свободный крой.
Яркие цвета 🍂
Размер единый 48-50-52-54-56.
Легкий зрелый стиль.
Цена 2500₽
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
DIOR🙃
Двойка костюм в
ЧРазмеры: M L XL XXL 3XL качество :
шикарное
Материал : двунитка цвет :
черный бордовый. синий.
сезон: ОСЕНЬ/BECHA
Цена всего 2500₽
Менеджер Telegram
✅ Наш канал с отзывами.
❤9👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @taqwastore1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@taqwastore1 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Taqwa | Магазин мужской одежды” (@taqwastore1), 16,195 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taqwastore1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.