Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TARMATARM

Channel

TARMATARM

@tarmatarm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,080subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151295836
TypeChannel
Username@tarmatarm
CreatedBetween 1 February 2019 and 30 September 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tarmatarm

Growth

4,0804,1344,1077 August 2026 — 4,134 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,134 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,131 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,122 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,113 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,106 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,097 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,095 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,092 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,084 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,080 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,072–4,142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 23:214,080-4
1 Sept 2026, 10:474,084-8
29 Aug 2026, 18:154,092-3
27 Aug 2026, 04:574,095-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:244,097-9
20 Aug 2026, 13:524,106-7
17 Aug 2026, 09:554,113+1
14 Aug 2026, 03:464,112-10
10 Aug 2026, 23:284,122-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:144,131-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,134no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:094,134first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
2m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,331 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,33440.0%
🔥59117.7%
45813.7%
❤‍🔥2828.47%
👍2547.63%
custom 54340970722088890862487.45%
🤨431.29%
😢401.20%
custom 5438177037737010749330.991%
😈220.66%
🎉200.6%
custom 546315667060976806860.18%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tarmatarm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2025 to 16 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jan 2026, 15:14 UTC≈3,760 views241 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я пока ещё не собрался рисовать комиксы, но хочу с вами поделиться мягкой игрушкой, которую я себе заказал у @red_panda_toys. Ну крутяк же?)

🔥15243👍31🤨8❤‍🔥5😁2

31 Dec 2025, 15:59 UTC≈4,650 views283 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, с Новым годом! Я немного сошел с комиксной дистанции, но пока не забросил комиксы окончательно. В следующем году обещаю вернуться)) 🎄

🔥163custom 54340970722088890866532👍10🎉7custom 54631566706097680686

6 Oct 2025, 06:02 UTC≈8,630 views355 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всегда есть третий вариант)

❤‍🔥203😁61🔥60🎉1312😈5🤨1

1 Sept 2025, 06:04 UTC≈10,200 views340 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как грамотно свалить с контрольной)

🔥178😁110custom 5434097072208889086318❤‍🔥5👍5custom 54381770377370107493

25 Aug 2025, 06:07 UTC≈11,200 views216 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Картинка по мотивам одного анекдота) Версия без пены и сам анекдот в комментариях

😁164🤨2421👍5custom 54381770377370107492

18 Aug 2025, 06:03 UTC≈10,800 views359 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бабкам виднее…

😁286👍31😈1511custom 54340970722088890866custom 54381770377370107495❤‍🔥3🤨2

8 Aug 2025, 07:53 UTC≈9,860 views231 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Дружелюбный озабоченный сосед» Версия погорячее в комментариях))

92😁65custom 543409707220888908642custom 543817703773701074916❤‍🔥7👍7🔥2

1 Aug 2025, 06:29 UTC≈11,000 views402 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Причина сходить к врачу

😁305custom 543409707220888908647❤‍🔥21👍128custom 54381770377370107494🔥3😈2

26 Jul 2025, 13:21 UTC≈9,340 views129 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ребята, хочу вам сообщить, что хожу на курсы озвучки. Точно не знаю, как буду использовать полученные навыки. Но пока поделюсь с вами одной из своих домашек. Там всё далеко от профессионализма, но зато я получил кучу фана в процессе работы над трейлером))

77👍27🔥11🤨8❤‍🔥3😁3

18 Jul 2025, 06:21 UTC≈11,100 views394 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вместо тысячи извинений вот вам комикс)

😁283😢40custom 543409707220888908632❤‍🔥18👍127🔥2

22 Jun 2025, 10:43 UTC≈7,840 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот это конечно МОЩНО!!!

34🔥11

22 Jun 2025, 10:43 UTC≈9,320 views149 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @crying_lil_snakePhoto

Behold! Целая толпа вдохновляющих личностей! #фанарт #fanart

98👍25❤‍🔥17🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tarmatarm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Martadello
@martadello · 40,226
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,237
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TARMATARM” (@tarmatarm), 4,080 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarmatarm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.