Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,625–8,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:37
7,725
-18
14 Sept 2026, 00:39
7,743
+3,358
10 Sept 2026, 09:39
4,385
+223
5 Sept 2026, 07:19
4,162
-613
1 Sept 2026, 22:13
4,775
-947
29 Aug 2026, 16:13
5,722
-130
26 Aug 2026, 08:59
5,852
-158
23 Aug 2026, 07:45
6,010
-69
19 Aug 2026, 15:34
6,079
-14
16 Aug 2026, 06:09
6,093
-25
12 Aug 2026, 16:24
6,118
-263
9 Aug 2026, 22:11
6,381
-47
7 Aug 2026, 07:18
6,428
+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:30
6,427
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:19
6,427
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,005 reactions across 23 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
423
42.1%
🔥
195
19.4%
👍
156
15.5%
😁
53
5.27%
🙏
42
4.18%
🥰
35
3.48%
❤🔥
22
2.19%
💯
16
1.59%
🍓
15
1.49%
🤣
12
1.19%
😍
9
0.896%
🤗
9
0.896%
😘
8
0.796%
💘
2
0.199%
🤔
2
0.199%
🎉
1
0.1%
🐳
1
0.1%
👌
1
0.1%
👏
1
0.1%
💋
1
0.1%
1 further kind
1
0.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,005 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @taro_555. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сидим с Ладушкой на веранде, завтракаем и наслаждаемся летом.
Прям обожаю это время года! Даже не столько за жару и солнце, сколько за то, что жизнь становится более размеренной, не надо лететь, чтобы успеть к одному репетитору, к другому, на секцию, в школу, покормить детей, проверить домашку. А у меня в этом году уже 4-ый первоклассник!!! 🙈
Прям чётко ощущаю удовольствие от жизни здесь и сейчас. И так не хочется …
Знаю, что у каждого из нас есть вопрос, на который хочется точно знать ответ - «получится» или «не получится», «да» или «нет»?
Приготовила для вас расклад, который внесёт ясность в это дело 😉 Загадывайте ситуацию, которая вас интересует, смотрите видео. Как почувствуете отклик, ставьте на паузу или делайте скрин. Расшифровка в комментариях.
Помните про ваши реакции ❤️
Обязательно делитесь, что вам выпало
#тарокажд…
В итоге вчера всё-таки откопала розетку от посудомойки в недрах своей кухни 🙈 и ВЫКЛЮЧИЛА ЕЁ НА ВСЮ НОЧЬ
С утра включила, заработала, как новенькая. Реально даже у техники (которая тоже отражает нас) случаются замыкания. Хорошая перегрузка никому не повредит)))
Какие у вас были сегодня сюрпризы от Вселенной?
У меня разные))) с утра все, как обычно, поработала с клиентами. Попила вкусный кофе. Потом пошла на консультацию к своей клиентке (она занимается астрологией джйотиш), я ей заказывала карту Льва. Он сейчас находится в выборе себя и своего места в жизни.
Интересную получила информацию. О том, что у него натальная карта очень духовного человека. И его путь - предназнач…
🤣10😘5❤4😁2❤🔥1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @taro_555. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@taro_555 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПАРАПСИХОЛОГ ТАРО ФУРС НАТАЛЬЯ” (@taro_555), 7,725 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taro_555.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
