ุงูุงูุงู ุงูุฌุงูู ุงู ุดุงุก ุงููู ุฑุญ ูุฑุฌุน ุงูุญุฏุณ ูุงูุชุณููู ูููุดู ุญูู ุจุงุฐู ุงููู๐ซฃ๐
โค158๐22โคโ๐ฅ20๐12๐7๐ฅ6๐2๐ณ1

Channel
@tarot_reading369
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
6,301subscribers
-99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002213364569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarot_reading369 |
| Description | ุงุดุงุฑู ููุงูู ุญุฏุณู - ุชุงุฑูุช - ุฎุฑุงุฆุท - ู ุนููู ุงุช ุนุงู ู ุงูุฑุงุฏ ูููุดู ุทุงูุชู ุญูููโฅ๏ธ - 5551 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarot_reading369 |
Religion โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:28 | 6,301 | -15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 6,316 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:11 | 6,318 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 6,324 | +6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 6,318 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 6,319 | -15 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 6,334 | -15 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 6,349 | -6 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 6,355 | -8 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 6,363 | -7 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 6,370 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 6,372 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 6,379 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 6,381 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 6,387 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 6,405 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 6,414 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 6,426 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 6,419 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 6,410 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (6 August 2026 โ 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 90,960 |
| Reactions total | 5,428 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 5 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
10,808 reactions across 53 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 8,776 | 81.2% | |
| ๐ฅ | 362 | 3.35% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 333 | 3.08% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 227 | 2.10% | |
| ๐ | 215 | 1.99% | |
| ๐ณ | 189 | 1.75% | |
| ๐ | 97 | 0.897% | |
| ๐ | 89 | 0.823% | |
| ๐ค | 80 | 0.74% | |
| ๐ | 74 | 0.685% | |
| ๐ | 63 | 0.583% | |
| ๐ | 51 | 0.472% | |
| ๐ | 50 | 0.463% | |
| ๐จ | 48 | 0.444% | |
| ๐ญ | 35 | 0.324% | |
| ๐ | 33 | 0.305% | |
| ๐ค | 24 | 0.222% | |
| โ | 13 | 0.12% | |
| โ | 12 | 0.111% | |
| ๐ | 11 | 0.102% | |
| 7 further kinds | 26 | 0.241% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 10,808 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ุงูุงูุงู ุงูุฌุงูู ุงู ุดุงุก ุงููู ุฑุญ ูุฑุฌุน ุงูุญุฏุณ ูุงูุชุณููู ูููุดู ุญูู ุจุงุฐู ุงููู๐ซฃ๐
โค158๐22โคโ๐ฅ20๐12๐7๐ฅ6๐2๐ณ1
ุงูู ุฌูุช ู ูููู ุชุณููู ุงููู ูุงุนุฑู ุชุงุฎุฑุช ุนูู ููุงู ู ู ุงูุญุฌูุฒุงุช ุจุณ ู ุฑูุถู ู ุงูุฏุฑ ุงุฎุงุทุฑ ุจูุฑุงุกุฉ ุงุญุฏ ูุจุณ ุงุณูู ูุง ูุงุฎูุต ู ููุง ุงุฑูุฏ ุงูุทููุง ุญููุง ู ุจุงูุงูุงู ุงูุฌุงูู ุงู ุดุงุก ุงููู ุญุฑุฌุน ุงุณูู ุงุชู ูู ู ุชูุญูู ุนููู ุงูู ุญุณูู ุงููู ูู ู ุงูู ู ุงููุฏ ุฑุญ ุงุจูุบ ุญุชู ุฎุงู ูุงุณูู ุงุญุฏ ู ูู ุชูู ุงููู ๐ฉถ
โค127๐ณ19๐11๐7๐5๐ฅ3๐1๐ค1
ุฌุงูุช ูุนูู ุตุญูู ุตุนุจู ุจุณ ุนุฏุชุชุช
โค154๐15๐ญ9๐5๐ณ4โ2๐2
ู ุณุงุฆู ู ุดุชุงูููู๐
โค142๐ฅ14๐ณ9๐8๐ 5๐3๐1
ุฎุตูุตุงู ู ูุง ูููุงูุฉ ุงูุงุณุจูุน
โค232๐จ28๐ณ7
ุงูุชุจูู ูุฐู ุงูุงูุงู ู ู ุงูุงุดุฎุงุต ูุงุญุฐุฑู ู ู ููุงูุงูู
โค269๐27๐จ20๐ฅ11๐ณ3
ุญุจุงูุจ ุงูู ู ูููู ุชุณููู ูููู ูุงู ู ุฑูุถู ุดูุฑุงู ูุชููู ูู ๐ ุจุณ ุงุฑุฌุน ุชุณููู ุฑุญ ุงุจูุบูู ๐
โค173โคโ๐ฅ14๐10๐ฅฐ10๐ณ5๐2๐ค1๐1
ุงุดุฎุงุต ุฏุงูุฑ ู ุฏุงูุฑูู ุงู ูุงุจุณูู ุงุจูุถุุงุณูุฏุุงุญู ุฑ ุงุณุชุนุฏู ุชุณุชูุจููู ุฎุจุฑ ุญูู ู ูุง ูููุงูุฉ ุงูุดูุฑ
โค510โคโ๐ฅ77๐32๐20๐ฅ17๐8๐ณ5๐5
ูุทุงูุฉ ุงูุฌุฐุจ ุจููุง ุนุงููู
โค253๐31๐ฅ16โคโ๐ฅ10๐7๐ณ4๐ฆ3๐1
ูุฐู ุงุฎุฑ ุงูุงู ุจูุฐุง ุงูุดูุฑ ู ูุง ูููู 11/1 ุทุงูุชูุง ููุด ูููู
โค242โคโ๐ฅ21๐11๐ณ10๐ฅ9๐3
https://www.instagram.com/channel/lwpQmKKYJ662fS1I/ ููุงุฉ ุงูุงูุณุชูุฑุงู ๐ซถ๐ป
โค85๐7๐4
ุถุฑูุฑู ุงูููู ุชูุฑูู ุณูุฑุฉ ุงูุญุฏูุฏ ุญุจุงูุจ
โค129๐ฅฐ8โคโ๐ฅ5๐ณ4
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @tarot_reading369. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 3 posts on @tarot_reading369 as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ุญุทู ุณุคุงู ุจุจุงููู ูุงุฎุชุงุฑู :
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ป๐จ๐๐๐๐โ (@tarot_reading369), 6,301 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarot_reading369.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.