Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Tartaria
@tartary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 24 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001467964413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tartary |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tartary |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:14 | 554 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 552 | +1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:05 | 551 | +1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 550 | -2 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 552 | no change |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 552 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 34m 18s
- Average length
- 6m 52s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
did the mud flood cover all this?
Photo, posted without a caption
was it buried under the mud flood? is the mud flood the same as The Flood?
Meren syvyyksissä sukeltajat väittävät löytäneensä jotain mahdotonta – kirjan, jonka ei pitäisi olla olemassa. Sen sivut hohtavat kuin metalli, ja niihin on kaiverrettu symboleja, joita kukaan ei osaa lukea... ja yksi sana toistuu yhä uudelleen: Tartaria. Keitä he olivat – imperiumi, joka pyyhkäistiin pois historiasta, vai myytti, joka syntyi Vanhan maailman raunioista? Jotkut sanovat, että Tartaria oli maailmanla…
https://youtu.be/ivaqsphkScg?is=pkzlbcmWXE9svK2s
Suuri Tartaria ei ole salaliittoteoria eikä myytti. Se on todellinen historia kansoista, joilta riistettiin oikeus omaan nimeensä. Kazakit, džungaarit, burjaatit ja jakuutit luokiteltiin kaikki ”Tartarian osaksi”, eikä heillä siksi ollut erillistä historiaa, joka olisi pitänyt muistaa. Näin toimii tehokkain tapa tuhota sivilisaatio: ei miekalla vaan sanoilla.
https://rumble.com/v1ki19h-stolenhistory-23-the-destruction-of-the-old-world.html
How They Buried Tartaria With 432,000,000 Tons of Mud — The Mudflood 👇JFK JR RETURNS — HE IS POSTING HERE NOW https://t.me/JFK_Q17 ✅️ 📱 We’re removing all BOT accounts. You must CONFIRM that you’re a real person to to continue using the application! ⚠️ CLICK BELOW. Fast, safe, and free.👇 ➡️➡️ VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT ➡️➡️ VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT
Here is a drawing of a cordless street lamp from the early 1900s. This is just one type of method of using the Etheric electricity in street lighting, with several other possibilities known and used as well. However, according to today's main stream story, these were actually gas lamps. In the evening they were ignited by hand and extinguished in the morning. - Ron Wilson @Free_Energy_Tesla ⚡️ I found a hidden cha…
TARTARIA - FREE ENERGY AND MORE - The CIA Erased Tartarian History..
🇮🇹 Italy GIGANTIC DOORS & COLUMNS. 🌎 🔎🕍🚪🕍 🌍 (00min : 25sec) (00min : 11sec) This is the inner area of the Cathedral of Milan (Duomo di Milano), more precisely the central room or central nave (Central Nave / Navata centrale). Gawk at this ancient architecture and feel how small you are. Alone, the door to the room is about 8 meters high, while…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tartary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@izrah4 · 4,548
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tartaria” (@tartary), 554 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tartary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.