حُبِّيكَ يا خير خلق الله.. ﷺ

Channel
طَيْف
@tayf_66
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,963subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001683982382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tayf_66 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tayf_66 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 7,963 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 7,962 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 7,967 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 7,953 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 7,942 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 7,926 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 7,921 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 7,908 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 7,901 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 7,900 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 7,912 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 7,900 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 7,900 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.1%
- avg views ÷ 7,963 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,920
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (19 February 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,609 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
هل من طبيبٍ لداء الحب..؟
خليليَّ.. ليلى قرّة العين..
أشدُّ الجهاد جهادُ الهوى..
وطن النجوم أنا هنا..
وقائلةٍ لمّا أردت وداعها..
وقائلةٍ والدمعُ سَكبٌ مُبادِرٌ..
تكادُ بلادُ الله يا أمّ معمرِ..
تأوّبني ليلٌ بيثرب أعسرُ..
وتلك وصيتي لكِ يا هتون.. [أب لابنته] :)
إني ذكرتك بالزهراء مشتاقا..
وُلِدوا في طفولة الأرض قلّة..
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @tayf_66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aleff1 · 52,642
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@Majdolin2023 · 27,661
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@toratheladabelarabi · 36,349
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
@Taqat_bialmujab · 70,201
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
@afraheslame · 38,326
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 September 2026
@Daii2020 · 81,847
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
@quraanna7ya · 32,041
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
@Granada93 · 31,445
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@qabs97 · 35,555
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@Almgaz · 29,437
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
@Hobaba7 · 60,354
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@khaledabushadi · 29,115
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
@balighoun9 · 88,727
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
@Nafae3 · 105,865
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@haref2 · 34,798
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@Balaghaton · 53,966
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@alaqsa_6ofan · 35,197
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
@fetra20 · 50,904
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
@sarsrt · 49,810
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
@QusayAlosaily · 125,524
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@bssthalk · 53,384
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@eipo0o · 26,364
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@Malaz_Alsh3raa · 50,377
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@isfa1r · 76,969
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طَيْف” (@tayf_66), 7,963 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tayf_66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.