Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 197–226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:16
223
+12
10 Sept 2026, 16:38
211
+5
25 Aug 2026, 01:58
206
+2
16 Aug 2026, 19:23
204
+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:47
200
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:31
201
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:06
201
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
18
12.5%
❤
16
11.1%
💯
14
9.72%
🍓
11
7.64%
✍
9
6.25%
💅
7
4.86%
👏
6
4.17%
😎
6
4.17%
🤝
6
4.17%
🏆
5
3.47%
💋
5
3.47%
⚡
4
2.78%
👨💻
4
2.78%
👻
4
2.78%
🥰
4
2.78%
🦄
4
2.78%
☃
2
1.39%
❤🔥
2
1.39%
🍾
2
1.39%
🎃
2
1.39%
10 further kinds
13
9.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tazakigambles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
MATT FURIE just tweeted about $BOYZ and said this is the only project he is going to be supporting moving forward!
https://x.com/Matt_Furie/status/2085831709657055539?s=20
0x49D8022cfa113DaDb8cb1A5b22250524cf24B926
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4c6a3ce1be8b458b57a557a97c6639132ef0cfc8f43e1bc727fff7d828790513
SEAL UPDATE 🪶
The photos above show 2 different charts, but both are from the same team.
$SURF was their previous project last year, and it had a very strong run. It was launched on PLS, unfortunately we have saw how that chain died.
For some background on the team: they’ve launched multiple 100x runners before, including CGPT, which eventually got listed on Binance.
I’ve been watching this one closely, and the s…
🚨 $SEAL is now officially listed on CoinGecko! 🦭
You can now track $SEAL on Robinhood Chain, including its price, trading volume, and market data—all in one place. 👇
coingecko.com/en/coins/crypt…
Another major milestone for the $SEAL ecosystem, with many more to come.
See you on the beach! 🌴
PS: This will cook hard, the train is about to leave so I'm saving you a seat. It's up to you if you want to ride it. 🦭
SEAL UPDATE 🪶
Wonderful launch by seal team while I was asleep. 99K to 1M first candle and now consolidating under 300K.
This will be a long journey so don't miss the ride.
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x54d8dfe9e16fdfde60ae32914f36a7a9e8da89fe2c4d98107a8e5a23a83f3394
KITE 🪶
🔴🔴🔴
https://t.me/tazakigambles/3
A new AI-powered infrastructure project is officially launching today.
LAUNCHING TODAY 2PM UTC
Kite Protocol is an AI Execution Layer designed to simplify onchain trading by transforming natural language into executable blockchain actions.
Instead of navigating multiple interfaces, users can simply describe what they want to do while Kite prepares secure execution flows. E…
$SEAL token by Crypto Paradise (Doxxed Team) will be launching on Robinhood chain this August 4th.
⚫️⚫️⚫️
https://t.me/tazakigambles/3
200,000+ $SEAL gets you into the DAO group where the alpha, opportunities and the magic happens
Their previous projects are amazing, a lot of 100x has been printed. Guaranteed Tier 1 team. This will be backed by a lot of T1 kols on X as well so put it in your radar.
See you on the…
🎁 GIVEAWAY — ONE winner gets a $100 AI trading agent for 30 days.
You choose its strategy. It trades Solana prediction markets 24/7. You keep 100% of the profits — the principal returns to us when the 30 days end.
To enter:
1. Sign up at hiveagents.tech
2. Get 1 friend to join with your referral link (it's on your profile)
Winner drawn July 25. Every trade verified on-chain. 🐝
Over the past few months, I got burned by people in crypto that I genuinely thought were friends. This space has a way of showing you who’s real and who’s only around when it benefits them. I know I’m not the only one who’s been drained by it.
But I’m officially back and will be actively supporting projects I truly believe and will do everything I can for its success like good old times.
First up is Hive Agents, bu…
Good morning, fam! One good thing about bad market conditions is we get unexpected vacations and more time to bond with family and friends. 🏝
Now we wait and see how BTC plays out. Either it drops below 60K or pumps back up to 85K–90K.💰
Really hoping on-chain volume on ETH comes back soon, but for now SOL is still king and where most degens are actively playing. 📤
Babyvibe Update 🪙
Called this at 300K, now currently at 2.4M. Very solid team behind this project. The chart looks wonderful, the community are strong holders and highly active.
https://dexscreener.com/solana/An9dC5p9ZqCg9LB4cKCBtLvoJCShpXrWw53xGZwyvroK
Good morning everyone! The market is looking strong. Majors are all green, and volume in the degen space has been amazing!
TON has been getting a lot of attention lately, almost a 2x move from the dip over the past few months. On-chain volume is also picking up, creating more opportunities for degens.
Currently watching the CME gap around $84,000 to $85,000 BTC. There isn’t much resistance in that range, so there’s…
We got a reply from SAVE THE $FROGS!
Will post next screenshot with our next communication soon.
🟢 https://x.com/SaveTheFrogsETH/status/2050444588431577287?s=20
🍓1💅1💯1🔥1🥰1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tazakigambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tazakigambles named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@kiteprotocol named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tazaki Gambles” (@tazakigambles), 223 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tazakigambles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.