🔥👏🏼 Беларусь U18 сравняла счет в серии четвертьфинала! Нас ожидает третья встреча 🤩🤩 Беларусь U18 – «Рыцари» – 3:2 Счет в серии: 1-1 👍 @teamBelarus1817
❤🔥18👍7❤2🔥1

Channel
@teamBelarus1817
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,705subscribers
+101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001726136474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teamBelarus1817 |
| Created | 26 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teamBelarus1817 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 1,705 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 1,697 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,694 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 1,688 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:26 | 1,687 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 1,682 | +21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,661 | +6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 1,655 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 1,642 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,631 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 1,608 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 1,604 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 1,604 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
291 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 92 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 89 | 30.6% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 4.47% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 2.75% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.687% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.687% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.344% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.344% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.344% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥👏🏼 Беларусь U18 сравняла счет в серии четвертьфинала! Нас ожидает третья встреча 🤩🤩 Беларусь U18 – «Рыцари» – 3:2 Счет в серии: 1-1 👍 @teamBelarus1817
❤🔥18👍7❤2🔥1
🥊🥊🥊 ПОНЕСЛАААААСЬ!!! Максим Снопко и Владислав Пешкур схлестнулись один на один! Эмоциональный матч – здесь. 👍 @teamBelarus1817
🔥17❤🔥7❤3🤩1
🔥🔥🔥 Александр Гуленков реализует большинство!!! И это уже 3:0! Вы должны видеть этот матч. 👍 @teamBelarus1817
❤4🔥1
💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻 Вторую забрасываем! Никита Максименко делает счет 2:0. Забивает в похожем стиле, что и Ярослав Корзун. Поддерживаем наших и включаем трансляцию. 👍 @teamBelarus1817
❤7
🔥🔥🔥 Есть первый гол! Настойчиво атаковали ворота соперника и Ярослав Корзун на добивании забросил шайбу! Смотрим матч здесь. 👍@teamBelarus1817
❤6
📹 Вот-вот стартует поединок 1/4 финала с лидской командой. Откладываем все дела и погнали поддерживать наших парней! 📺Прямая трансляция 👍@teamBelarus1817
❤2❤🔥1
📋 Забава в воротах, Петроченко – бэкап. Изучаем состав юниорской сборной Беларуси на второй матч четвертьфинала против «Рыцарей» 🤩 БЕЛАРУСЬ U18: Забава (Петроченко); Сущинский (К) – Терешко, Топик (А) – Гуленков – Аксюто; Пальчик – Миронов, Максименко – Я.Корзун – К.Иванов (А); Пешкур – Сенчук, Новицкий – Черняковский – Суслов; Мелешко – Каминский, Алистров – Роговцев – Рубан. 📺Прямая трансляция 👍@teamBelarus1817
🏆4❤1
🗣 Егор Аксюто: мы неплохо играли, но не реализовали свои моменты, хотя инициатива была на нашей стороне Форвард юниорской сборной прокомментировал первый матч четвертьфинальной серии против «Рыцарей». – Мы неплохо играли, но не реализовали свои моменты, а соперник реализовал – поэтому проиграли. Но я считаю, инициатива была на нашей стороне. – Первый период безголевой, затем довели отставание до минимума. В итоге …
🔥12❤3👍2🌭1
🏒 Идем брать реванш у «Рыцарей» Юниорская сборная вчера минимально уступила коллективу из Лиды. Сегодня новый день, а значит выводы сделаны и команда заряжена по полной. Вперед, парни! 🏆 Кубок Цыплакова (1/4 финала) 🏒Беларусь U18 – 🏒«Рыцари» 🗓️ 07.08.2026 ⌚️ 13:00 🏟 г. Островец, Ледовая арена ⚔️ Счет в серии (до 2-х побед): 0-1 (2:3) 👍@teamBelarus1817
❤8❤🔥2
🗣 Ярослав Чуприс: пацаны сегодня бились, рубились, главное — самоотдача и желание, а результат придет. Главный тренер юниорской сборной Беларуси подвел итоги поединка с «Рыцарями» в 1/4 финала Кубка Цыплакова (2:3, 0-1 в серии). – Мы проиграли по счету, но не по игре. Игры в Кубке Цыплакова устроены таким образом, что неважно, как ты играешь – важна победа. Это только первая игра в серии до двух побед. По самоотдач…
🔥15❤🔥8❤5👍2💯2
😢 С минимальной разницей в счете уступаем в первой встрече четвертьфинала Сегодня поединок завершается не в нашу пользу. Собираемся с мыслями и встречаемся завтра. 🏒 Беларусь U18 – 🏒 Рыцари – 2:3 (0:1, 1:2, 1:0) 🏒 0:1 – 06:05 Колодко (Ивуть, Шумский) 🏒 0:2 – 32:58 Нелипович (Качан, Снопко) 🏒 0:3 – 34:54 Колодко (Ивуть, Шумский) 🏒 1:3 – 36:18 Аксюто (Пешкур) 🏒 2:3 – 46:07 Черняковский (Максименко, К.Иванов) 🏒 …
❤7❤🔥5😢3
2️⃣💡3️⃣ГОООООЛ! Кирилл Черняковский сокращает отставание до минимума Прямая трансляция 👈🏻 👍 @teamBelarus1817
🔥5❤🔥4👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @teamBelarus1817. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Беларусь U18, U17” (@teamBelarus1817), 1,705 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamBelarus1817.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.