Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +829. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,131–18,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 09:40
18,084
+68
7 Nov 2026, 06:11
18,016
+43
6 Nov 2026, 08:19
17,973
+117
5 Nov 2026, 10:39
17,856
+17
4 Nov 2026, 09:49
17,839
-14
3 Nov 2026, 07:40
17,853
-7
2 Nov 2026, 05:38
17,860
-17
1 Nov 2026, 03:14
17,877
-24
31 Oct 2026, 06:34
17,901
+24
30 Oct 2026, 04:31
17,877
-12
29 Oct 2026, 07:46
17,889
+27
28 Oct 2026, 08:04
17,862
+16
27 Oct 2026, 09:30
17,846
-10
26 Oct 2026, 08:01
17,856
-9
25 Oct 2026, 08:55
17,865
+29
24 Oct 2026, 08:36
17,836
+113
23 Oct 2026, 05:47
17,723
-46
22 Oct 2026, 07:39
17,769
-4
21 Oct 2026, 04:06
17,773
-11
20 Oct 2026, 01:57
17,784
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.28%
avg views ÷ 18,084 subscribers
Avg views / post
774
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
82 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
20,119
Reactions total
494
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 04:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 46m
Average length
1h 23m
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,411 reactions across 66 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
628
44.5%
🔥
395
28.0%
❤🔥
143
10.1%
🙏
101
7.16%
💯
64
4.54%
💘
38
2.69%
⚡
16
1.13%
🌚
6
0.425%
🤩
6
0.425%
🥰
6
0.425%
🤯
5
0.354%
💔
2
0.142%
😭
1
0.071%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 69 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tebe_poslaniye. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сегодня отвечаю на ваши вопросы, смотрю поле и разбираю запросы на тему чистки «Открытие дорог» 11.11 🗝
Смотрю сегодня деньги, отношения, реализацию, закрытые дороги, повторяющиеся сценарии, родовые и кармические программы
Формулируй запрос конкретно: какая ситуация сейчас не разрешается, где чувствуешь блокировку или что постоянно повторяется в твоей жизни 💌
Свои вопросы пишите сюда 👇🏻
МОЙ ЗАПРОС ✍🏼
🎧 ЧТО БУДЕТ НА ЧИСТКЕ 11.11
В аудио подробно рассказала, как пройдёт чистка 11.11, почему я выбрала именно эту дату, что происходит в эти дни на небе и как мы будем работать в практике 🧘♀️
Разобрала, с какими слоями будем работать: подключки и чужеродные воздействия, родовые и кармические программы, обеты, клятвы и договоры. Объяснила, почему важно работать со всеми этими слоями в эту дату 📆
Также рассказала, для…
ЧАСТЬ 2
Как это выглядит в жизни 👇🏻
Ты хочешь денег, а на подходе к ним вдруг пропадает желание и ты попадаешь в прокрастинацию. Хочешь близости, а рядом с хорошим человеком становится пусто и тянет сбежать. Возможность почти в руках, и в последний момент что-то срывается. Тебе кажется, что это характер или невезение, хотя ты упираешься в собственное «нельзя», сказанное много лет назад
Такое «нельзя» невозможно сн…
Обещала рассказать про клятвы, обеты и самопроклятия, поэтому разбираю подробно, что это такое, как звучит, где хранится и почему из-за этого закрываются дороги 😕
Так как с этим мы будем работать на чистке в том числе и убирать эти узлы, оставляю то в чем вы себя можете узнать 🧘🏻♀️
ЧАСТЬ 1
Клятва - это обещание, которое человек даёт себе после сильной боли, чтобы она больше не повторилась. Звучит оно так: «больше…
Классные процессы достаются на практике внутри подкаста, кто не слушал, бегом слушать 🔥🎧
А это только 5 минут практики, представьте что будет вылезать на чистке, так что велком пока продажи открыты 👇🏻
Сегодня поступали сообщения, что не работает бот где вы можете приобрести чистку, к сожалению все сервера были атакованы и упали, по этому запрос на участие оставляйте в моем отделе заботы, вас добавят через него на ч…
Интересно, благодарю 🙏 надо переслушать и записать слова, для отпускания защитника той ситуации.
На повторяющиеся истории с неудачной любовью, всплыли воспоминания об однокласснике из 4го класса, с кем сидела за одной партой и в кого была влюблена детской милой любовью ) но за все эти годы даже никогда не вспоминала его. А тут вот всплыло воспоминание) на следующий год его семья переехала и я помню что расстроилась н…
Состояние конечно капец , плакать начала от солнечного сплетение до горло болеть начало и колоть и потом чуть конечно затошнила прям в точку попали
Ещё раз благодарю
Благодарю Хельга я нашла 🙏
Буду продолжать с этим работать и попробую разбираться
❤4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @tebe_poslaniye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Тяжело отпускаю людей/отношения, всегда тянет обратно 😭35%
Чувствую чужеродность будто «что-то на мне» 🫣21%
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ясность мысли @yasnost_misli · 31,778 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
life.energy @ezomir369 · 51,311 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Numerorum @numerorum · 39,648 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Вероника Фельдблюм @VeroFeldblium · 36,894 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Петр Лупенко @peka_pohudel · 89,849 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
Кристина Астра | Энергопрактик @masterskaya_jelaniy · 20,288 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
Эра Водолея @AgeofAquariusuncensored · 28,149 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
Римма Карамова @karamova_fm · 31,276 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Наталья Вожакова @Nata_non_stop · 25,762 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Деньги силой мысли🔸Ольга Кириллова @happymirinfo · 33,654 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Ирина Подзорова – КАССИОПЕЯ @cassiopeia_center · 26,276 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Медитации @podsoznanie_you · 89,994 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТЕБЕ ПОСЛАНИЕ” (@tebe_poslaniye), 18,084 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tebe_poslaniye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.