💢 چند روزه اکثر رسانه های حکومتی این ویدیو رو منتشر کردن!!! ـ🔴این ویدیو توضیح میده که چطوری از خودمون در برابر تشعشعات هسته ای مراقبت کنیم! 🔴 اگه «کوه کلنگ» توسط آمریکا مورد حمله قرار بگیره، تشعشعاتش به تهران هم میرسه! 💙@TechByAmmar
💔73👎9❤6🤬3👍1

Channel
@techbyammar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52,117subscribers
-2,818 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001341420242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @techbyammar |
| Description | کانفیگ های V2Ray, Hiddify, Argo, Napsternet... آپدیت فیلترشکن های به روز آپدیت های برنامه های کاربردی 📍لینک گروه: https://t.me/techbyammar_chat |
| Created | 16 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/techbyammar |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:04 | 52,117 | -24 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 52,141 | -28 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 52,169 | -32 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 52,201 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 52,218 | -33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 52,251 | -29 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 52,280 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 52,304 | -27 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 52,331 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 52,362 | -32 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 52,394 | -27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 52,421 | -31 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 52,452 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 52,464 | -13 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 52,477 | -19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 52,496 | -28 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 52,524 | -24 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 52,548 | -42 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 52,590 | -143 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 52,733 | first reading |
290 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (30 July 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 809,970 |
| Reactions total | 5,916 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Nov 2026, 23:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,642 reactions across 290 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,773 | 28.0% | |
| 🤣 | 4,668 | 22.6% | |
| ❤ | 3,515 | 17.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1,696 | 8.22% | |
| 💔 | 1,364 | 6.61% | |
| 👎 | 779 | 3.77% | |
| 😢 | 633 | 3.07% | |
| 🔥 | 564 | 2.73% | |
| 👏 | 551 | 2.67% | |
| 😐 | 443 | 2.15% | |
| 👌 | 213 | 1.03% | |
| 🤔 | 175 | 0.848% | |
| 🗿 | 160 | 0.775% | |
| 🙏 | 54 | 0.262% | |
| 😍 | 48 | 0.233% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.029% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 290 of the 290 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 290 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @techbyammar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 290 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💢 چند روزه اکثر رسانه های حکومتی این ویدیو رو منتشر کردن!!! ـ🔴این ویدیو توضیح میده که چطوری از خودمون در برابر تشعشعات هسته ای مراقبت کنیم! 🔴 اگه «کوه کلنگ» توسط آمریکا مورد حمله قرار بگیره، تشعشعاتش به تهران هم میرسه! 💙@TechByAmmar
💔73👎9❤6🤬3👍1
💢 امشب تو تلگرام جنگِ ی ۲ (وضعیت کنونیه سوخت رسان های آمریکایی) ❤️@TechByAmmar
👍26🤣6👎3❤1😢1
💢 به نام خدا امشب تو تلگرام جنگِ، مگه اینکه خلافش ثابت بشه ❤️@TechByAmmar
🤣53👍3👎2🔥2❤1
🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇷🇺 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇳🇱 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇩🇪 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇫🇮 ᴘʀᴏxʏ | 🇺🇸 ᴘʀᴏxʏ 🏳️ ᴘʀᴏxʏ
❤11
💢 فعالیت های بی سابقه و گسترده آمریکا در نزدیکی مرز 🔴هواپیماهای (MQ-9): 13 فروند 🔴 هواپیماهای (E-11): 1 فروند 🔴 هواپیماهای (MQ-1): 2 فروند ❤️@TechByAmmar
❤18👍7👎2
🔶هکر بایننس ۱.۴ میلیارد دلار بیتکوین را بین ۱۹ کیف پول تقسیم کرد 😵💫🫠 🔴 هکر بایننس پس از سرقت بیش از ۱۸ هزار و ۲۷۰ بیتکوین به ارزش تقریبی ۱.۴ میلیارد دلار، این داراییها را در ۱۹ کیف پول جداگانه تقسیم کرده است. ۱۷ کیف پول هرکدام دقیقاً ۱۰۰۰ بیتکوین دارند و تاکنون هیچکدام از این داراییها جابهجا نشدهاند. 🔴 برخلاف استیبلکوینها که صادرکنندگانشان میتوانند آدرسهای مشکوک را مسدود کنند، شبکه بیتکوین چنین قابلیت…
🤣26❤7👎2🗿2
🇺🇸🇶🇦 بازگشت میانجیهای قطری به تهران برای پیشبرد توافق میان ایران و آمریکا🤥 🔴 بر اساس این گزارش، میانجیهای قطری امروز با هماهنگی آمریکا به تهران بازمیگردند تا تلاشها برای دستیابی به توافق میان تهران و واشنگتن را ادامه دهند. ❤️@TechByAmmar
👎39❤5🔥2🤔1
⭕️ روزنامه والاستریت ژورنال روز پنجشنبه هفتم آبانماه گزارش داد که دریاسالار برد کوپر، فرمانده ستاد فرماندهی مرکزی ارتش آمریکا (سنتکام)، در نشستی کمسابقه در کاخ سفید، گزینههای نظامی حمله به ایران را به دونالد ترامپ ارائه کرده است. 🔴به گفته مقامهای آمریکایی و افراد آگاه از جزئیات این نشست، پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا، و ژنرال دن کین، رئیس ستاد مشترک نیروهای مسلح، نیز در جلسه حضور داشتند. این دیدار یک روز پس از نش…
👍21❤7🤣2👏1
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 01.PROXY 02.PROXY 03.PROXY 04.PROXY 05.PROXY 06.PROXY 07.PROXY 08.PROXY 09.PROXY 10.PROXY 11.PROXY 12.PROXY 13.PROXY 14.PROXY 15.PROXY 16.PROXY 17.PROXY 18.PROXY 19.PROXY 20.PROXY 21.PROXY 22.PROXY 23.PROXY 24.PROXY 25.PROXY 26.PROXY 27.PROXY 28.PROXY 29.PROXY 30.PROXY 31.PROXY 32.PROXY 33.PROXY 34.PROXY 35.PROXY 36.PROXY 37.PROXY 38.PROXY 39.PROXY 40.PROXY 41.PROXY 42.PROXY 43.PROXY 44.PROXY 45.PROXY 46…
❤16👍2
❌ کانال ۱۲ اسرائیل: شاباک اعلام کرده که قطر و ترکیه در انتخابات این کشور دخالت کردند و به رأیدهندگان برای انتخاب احزاب عربی رشوه دادند. 🔴این قضیه مثل اینکه جدیه و تحقیقات رو شروع کردن، هر موقع خبرهای موثق و تکمیلی اومد آپدیت میکنم. 💙@TechByAmmar
❤39👍12🤬9🤣5🤩2🙏1
⌛ اکبری، معاون وزیر ارتباطات: حملات DDoS با مبدأ داخلی در ۱۰ روز گذشته بیشتر از مبدأ خارجی بود 🔴 مدیرعامل شرکت ارتباطات زیرساخت با اشاره به وضعیت حملات سایبری در ۱۰ روز گذشته اعلام کرد که تعداد حملات DDoS با مبدأ داخلی از حملات با مبدأ خارجی بیشتر بوده است؛ وضعیتی که به گفته او، میتواند نشانهای از آلودگی دستگاههای کاربران داخلی و استفاده از آنها در باتنتها باشد. معاون وزیر ارتباطات همچنین تأکید کرد که وقوع حم…
🤔13❤7🤣3🔥1
🇮🇱 شبکه خبری برنی ✓ تمام آرا شمارش شدهاند، بهجز آرای داخل پاکتهای دوتایی. هیچکدام به ۶۱ کرسی نرسیدهاند. - ائتلاف نتانیاهو: ۵۳ کرسی - ائتلاف تغییر: ۴۸ کرسی - احزاب عرب: ۱۹ کرسی حزب لیکود با ۲۷ کرسی در رتبه اول قرار دارد و حزب یاشار با ۲۱ کرسی پس از آن است. نتایج تمام ائتلافها در محدوده پیشبینیشده نظرسنجیهای خروج از صندوق قرار گرفتهاند. ما پنج سناریوی احتمالی برای تشکیل ائتلاف را بر اساس آرای شمارششده بر…
👍10🤣3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @techbyammar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@techbyammar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در مورد این پرامپت ها، تعدادی زیاد وجود داره، اگه خواستین بهم بگید بیشتر براتون بذارم.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 290 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@techbyammar named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تکونولوژی با عمار” (@techbyammar), 52,117 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techbyammar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.