Channel
@techcounselor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
601subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002116630300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @techcounselor |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/techcounselor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 601 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 602 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 603 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 608 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 608 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 52.3% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 28.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5348079125061975628 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| custom 5348503265967355284 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.935% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Техпривет, коллеги. Начнем с разговора о ведомостях с непонятных углов. Ведомость и спецификация — это граница услуг, а не две таблицы. У практиков она проходит не по ГОСТу — по деньгам. Как по мне, ведомость — рискует стать листом проекта со сроком годности. План перегородок относительно устойчив на таймлайне реализации, а ведомость начинает устаревать в день сдачи: цены волатильны, артикулы живут до первого «сня…
❤2👍1💯1🔥1
Техпривет, коллеги. Ранее я целой чередой публикаций размышлял о том, как должны называться листы проекта — почему именно так, и что каждый лист обязан сказать читающему. Та система выстрадана и прижилась в практике. Ныне задумался о следующем ярусе — о таблицах: ведомость, спецификация, смета. Три слова, которые каждый из нас понимает по-своему — ибо жилой интерьер, в отличие от большой стройки, жёсткому стандарту …
❤5🔥2🦄1
Техпривет, коллеги. Пока «Постпроектница» готовится к выходу, в Noditector началась работа над волной, которая переведёт рутину дизайнера в отлаженный автоматизированный процесс «между делом». Noditector подал заявку в Яндекс AI Studio — и был отобран в качестве участника. Что это значит для нас: работа над ИИ-начинкой платформы будет идти при участии специалистов Яндекса. Мне лично повезло побывать в офисе Яндекса …
❤7🔥3👍2
Коллеги! Ищу строителей. Перешлите, если есть знакомые. Знаю, что рекомендовать — неблагородное дело, а пользоваться рекомендациями ещё и опасно. Но аномальная активность на интерьерном фронте поглотила всех наших постоянных партнёров на наших проектах, и новые тылы остаются неприкрытыми. Дайте рекомендацию, пожалуйста. Объект в Москве, более-менее центр. Небольшой, 110 м². Готовы проекты умного дома, вентиляции,…
❤2🔥2
На прошлой неделе подбирал зуммированный светильник (бренд назову X) под два конкретных угла на потолке — без светорасчёта, на коленке: прочертил тригонометрию вручную, прикинул нужный раствор. По названию в каталоге X нашёл Zoom, картинка на превью была понятной. Перешёл на страницу из каталога. Угла в характеристиках не нашёл, было только слово «Zoom». Само слово оказалось кликабельным — нажал, думал увидеть расши…
🔥4❤2👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
Генерация видео — что используете?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Генерация картинок — что используете?
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Текстовые ИИ-модели — чем пользуетесь?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Целостность Система удобнее для использования, когда её элементы представлены одинаковым образом. По книжке есть 4 вида целостности: эстетическая, функциональная, внутренняя и внешняя. Нам интересны в большей степени первые 2. Первая не очень меня касается, так как тут больше не про красоту, но она важна в общем результате: визуально нецелостный проект сразу виден, причём как профессионалу, так и обычному человеку…
❤3👍2🔥2
Техпривет, коллеги! Начал читать книжку под названием «Универсальные принципы дизайна». Она про интерфейсы, но многое можно переложить и на интерьеры. Буду рассказывать. Собственно, красивые вещи кажутся удобнее, чем они есть. Эстетика повышает терпимость к недостаткам. Заказчик прощает красивому то, за что некрасивое уже бы получило претензию. Автор ссылается на работы Куросу и Касимуры девяносто пятого года — он…
❤6🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @techcounselor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Генерация видео — что используете?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Генерация картинок — что используете?
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Текстовые ИИ-модели — чем пользуетесь?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВИИА ⚪️ Техвожатый” (@techcounselor), 601 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techcounselor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.