Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TechInsider

Channel

TechInsider

@techinsiderru

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

15,322subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067712602
TypeChannel
Username@techinsiderru
Created12 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/techinsiderru

Growth

15,32215,39415,3585 August 2026 — 15,394 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,394 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,392 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,382 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,383 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,381 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,372 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,376 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,370 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,365 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,357 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,355 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,357 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,352 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,349 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,341 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,337 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,332 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,328 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,322 subscribers5 August 202629 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,311–15,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:4315,322-1
29 Aug 2026, 01:4915,323-5
28 Aug 2026, 01:4215,328-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:0415,332-5
25 Aug 2026, 23:3315,337-4
25 Aug 2026, 03:0315,341-8
23 Aug 2026, 19:5215,349-3
22 Aug 2026, 01:4715,352-5
20 Aug 2026, 20:0515,357+2
19 Aug 2026, 23:0315,355-2
18 Aug 2026, 20:4315,357-5
17 Aug 2026, 18:3315,362-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:3415,365-5
15 Aug 2026, 00:4615,370-6
13 Aug 2026, 15:4815,376+4
12 Aug 2026, 12:1515,372-4
11 Aug 2026, 11:0415,376-5
10 Aug 2026, 10:5015,381-2
9 Aug 2026, 08:3115,383+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:1215,382first reading

Engagement

238 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.24%
avg views ÷ 15,322 subscribers
Avg views / post
803
233 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 238 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 221 of 233 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held238 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total187,075
Reactions total2,445
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 12s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,278 reactions across 207 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
68330.0%
🔥48921.5%
🤣45219.8%
👍28912.7%
😱944.13%
😢723.16%
502.19%
🤡401.76%
🤯311.36%
🤷‍♂291.27%
💅241.05%
🗿231.01%
20.088%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 221 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,445reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.84%
2 of 238 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
619
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
833
over 231 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJujKqj15 August 20265 August 2026
2W5zFJxCmJq124 August 202624 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC679 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

В этом симуляторе вам буквально предстоит искать иголку в стоге сена. Ждем релиза. У нас же других дел нет, мы играть будем! Techinsider

🤣10🤷‍♂1

28 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC705 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Видео с роботами превратили в мем с бегущими спортсменами. Как будто не очень смешно Techinsider

🤣5🤯3

28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC785 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Samsung показала первый монитор на 1100 Гц 4 новых монитора в линейке Odyssey 2027 представила Samsung. Odyssey G6 — первый игровой монитор с частотой обновления 1100 Гц. Но такая скорость только в разрешении HD. У G6 матрица Fast IPS и диагональ на 27 дюймов. Берем/не берем? Techinsider

🤷‍♂2

28 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC713 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Робота-утку создали во Франции для экспериментов Стартап Pollen Robotics разработал Microduck — одноглазого робота весом 800 гр. Идея прикольная — по сути с «платформой» можно делать все подряд, так как придумана она специально для экспериментов и обучения. 🐤🐤🐤 Techinsider

👍52🤷‍♂1

28 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC699 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Бедняга… Знаете, что нам это напомнило? Techinsider

🤣8🔥4

28 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC816 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой на оба колена используй — ничего болеть не будет #техмем

🤣29🤷‍♂1

28 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC809 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В Бразилии нашли следы гигантского млекопитающего Около 130 миллионов лет назад по территории современной Бразилии могло бродить млекопитающее размером с крупную собаку или даже небольшую пуму. Ученые нашли его следы и считают, что находка заставляет пересмотреть представление о крошечных предках млекопитающих, которые жили в тени динозавров. 😱 — миленько Techinsider

😱6👍4

28 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC834 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Это робот Agibot с эффектной распаковкой. После полетов в Китай мы себя чувствуем так же — ноги отмирают. Techinsider

🤣9👍2

28 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC823 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Джорд Лукас — гений Иначе как объяснять, что LEGO опять выпускает набор конструктора по «Звездным войнам». Разрушитель из 6 тыс. деталей с Вейдером за кучу денег. Это ли не мечта любого мальчика в 30+ лет? Techinsider

20

Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @techinsiderru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,765 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q129848799 on Wikidata, read 23 August 2026
LabelNo label recorded on this Wikidata item
Official sitehttps://www.techinsider.ru/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TechInsider” (@techinsiderru), 15,322 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techinsiderru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.