Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Airdrop Official

Channel

Crypto Airdrop Official

@technicalcrypto004

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,211subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178196829
TypeChannel
Username@technicalcrypto004
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/technicalcrypto004

Growth

8,2118,2688,239.57 August 2026 — 8,265 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,268 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,261 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,244 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,232 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,249 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,235 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,227 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,215 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,211 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,202–8,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 21:088,211-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:348,215-12
28 Aug 2026, 04:138,227-8
24 Aug 2026, 22:478,235-14
20 Aug 2026, 22:368,249+17
17 Aug 2026, 15:598,232-12
14 Aug 2026, 04:158,244-17
10 Aug 2026, 17:118,261-7
7 Aug 2026, 13:568,268+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:468,265first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 8,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held64 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total107,490
Reactions total1,243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,746 reactions across 64 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77644.4%
🔥52430.0%
😭1719.79%
👍1649.39%
👏452.58%
🌚221.26%
🎉140.802%
🫡140.802%
🙏50.286%
❤‍🔥40.229%
🤩30.172%
😇20.115%
10.057%
👌10.057%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,060 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$5 Future Bonus Received 🔥 50x Leverage & BTC/USDT

🔥181

27 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,440 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Over or still claiming? 👀 Here’s the updated APK 👇 https://t.me/NKT_LOVER/452827 If you actually made a profit from it, share your screenshot in the comments 📸 ⚠️ Before taking any trade, check the prediction rate first If the rate is around 50% and your prediction is correct, the winning payout can be around 100% of your position value Trade carefully and don’t risk more than you can afford to lose.

👍164

27 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,460 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Claim & Hold If You Don't Want Waste Your Voucher It's Very Clear App Server Down

👍108

27 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,500 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Scan & Claim Instant In Gate If You Have Gate Account ( With Kyc ) Then Try Link 🔗 Click Here EDIT ~~~~ NOW OVER

7🔥7

26 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈1,780 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$40 → $62 😭❤️ Thanks for the suggestion, bhai Otherwise, I was about to sell it before

12🔥8👏3

25 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,830 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

• Conversion is currently closed • Don’t do KYC yet wait for my update My friend received the withdrawal, so that’s why I shared it. The project has also raised $7M, so it looks promising

🔥97😭4

25 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,780 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔥 UP TO $13 BONUS + $5 PER REFERRAL 💰 Link: web.limitedapp.com/ref/in60r8do 1️⃣ Register using the link 2️⃣ Verify email + complete KYC → $8 bonus 3️⃣ Go to ☰ → Points & Rewards → Referral Rewards 4️⃣ Generate your referral link 5️⃣ Earn $5 for each referral 🎁 Invite 5 friends → extra $5 💰 Total: $8+5$ = 13$ bonus 📌 Redeem: 2,500 points = $25 minimum ⚠️ Redemption is currently having issues. Wait for my update

🔥1413

25 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,690 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Daily ~ Almost $0.15 (Similar Like Modulo But Task & Earn) Daily You Can Complete These 2 Tasks & Get Upto 0.4 Points (Almost $0.15) Join Link 🔗 https://t.me/technicalcrypto004/15681 Extra Points If Standard Tasks Added

18

25 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,770 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Thanks @admin agar price sahi rhta to

11🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @technicalcrypto004. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Poll553 voters

How’s your 2026 going so far? 👀

  1. Good 😊13%
  2. Average ✌️29%
  3. Bad 😞61%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LEGIT AIRDROPS
@LegitAirdrops010 · 52,344
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Feature earning
@feature_earning · 60,166
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Earn by Abhi (Crypto)
@EarnByAbhi23 · 31,886
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Airdrop Official” (@technicalcrypto004), 8,211 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technicalcrypto004.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.