Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TechNik

Channel

TechNik

@technikstudio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,511subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975020494
TypeChannel
Username@technikstudio
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/technikstudio

Growth

1,5111,5201,515.57 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,514 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,520 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,516 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,511 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,510–1,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 07:581,511-5
3 Sept 2026, 15:151,516-2
30 Aug 2026, 23:381,518-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:241,520+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:471,518-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:071,520+4
17 Aug 2026, 23:521,516+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:171,514-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:561,516-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:051,519-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:341,520no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:141,520first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16040.3%
👍10325.9%
5413.6%
❤‍🔥4110.3%
😁225.54%
👏51.26%
🤩51.26%
🙏41.01%
😢10.252%
🤡10.252%
🤮10.252%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC379 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍27🤩53🔥2🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC419 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Насправді досить непогано вийшло. Треба буде тільки звести нормально

👍15

5 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC418 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Відео буде тільки з субтитрами (жарт)

👍9😁6

5 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC429 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁12🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC425 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @in_factumPhoto

А що це 🦂 19-а ракетна бригада "трійкою" таке красиво запустила? У "Фламінго" горизональніший пуск, тому це щось інше. Візуально нагадує вайби ATACMS, але так само маю сумніви. А може просто з архівів залили. Хоча відео опубліковане сьогодні.

🔥224

4 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC424 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soniah_hubVideo

ОК опіздюлювання в БНР 🫡 Наші Аси 🇺🇦 на блатних номерах завдали серію ударів бомбами #GBU39 по дамбі💥 Також уже в який раз наші побратими на МіГ-29 вдало пройшлись вогнем по ворожим мостам і переправам на Півночі. Соняшник 🌻 | Чат 🦅| Бот 🤖 Instagram 📱 | TT 📱| WhatsApp📱

14🔥7

3 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC538 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нове відео вже на каналі Zuzana 2: досвід РЕАЛЬНИХ БОЇВ ЗСУ https://youtu.be/3crsyyzUHB8 https://youtu.be/3crsyyzUHB8 https://youtu.be/3crsyyzUHB8

👍9🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC538 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Але насправді, цікаво глянути що воно з себе буде являти. Може рано замовили Гріпени?))

7👍5

3 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC501 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Туреччина яка (точно) не скомуніздила F-22 Turkish Aerospace почала руліжні випробування першого прототипа винищувача Kaan із кодовою назвою P1. Випробування проходили з використанням двигуна від General Electrics. Під час них перевірили роботу двигунів, систем гальмування та керування польотом та інших критичних складових літака, перш ніж він почне льотні випробування. Порівняно із попереднім прототипом P0, цей ва

11👍9😁1

3 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC454 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @exilenova_plusVideo

Момент прильоту ударного БПЛА FP-1 по логістичному складу Wildberries у Володимирі.

🔥33👏5😢1

3 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC482 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Що не кажи, але я в шоці наскільки ефективними є далекобійні дрони.

👍27🤮1

2 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC546 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mag_vodograyPhoto

Ще одна цікава адаптація ЗРК «Stash» з ракетами AGM-114L Hellfire і антеною РЛС Rada на шасі DAF YA 4442 на озброєнні 302-ї ЗРБр. cred

❤‍🔥17🔥121

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @technikstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Список сухопутної військової техніки, виробленої в Україні (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…pravda.com/images/doc/b/4/b486f24-sau-bohdana-xl.jpg "Богдана 3.0"] [https://t.me/technikstudio/1008 "Богдана 4.0"] [https://auto.bigmir…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TechNik” (@technikstudio), 1,511 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technikstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.