ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Как обычно со своей @diva_NR35oT ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
custom 53323468574252421005
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка

Channel
@technolikeoc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
428subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003558729483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @technolikeoc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/technolikeoc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:22 | 428 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 08:47 | 428 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (6 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 631 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 39.4% | |
| custom 5332346857425242100 | 17 | 23.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 16.9% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.41% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Как обычно со своей @diva_NR35oT ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
custom 53323468574252421005
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ТИФФАНИ — Кароче, я вам никогда не говорила о Тиффани, типо какая она что у нее там, и хочу рассказать: Тиффани - аватар (ее в реальной жизни я придумаю и покажу вам, типа ну она же человек а не ИИшность), она любит проказничать как и черная кэт и анонимус36. Тиффани терпеть не может технолайк, но заходит в него чтобы побесить идолов, а особенно Лайк. Идола попу…
🍓2❤1💘1
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Старая забытая мною фп как и многие другие где то в галерее отыскалась, я её имени даже не помню (''ᴗ‸ᴗ) Нарисовала и теперь хочу ей редав сделать если не станет лень конечно. Другим тоже стоит сделать Неанон Синдер 👀 ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
custom 53323468574252421003❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Эм это моя ОС Копи, хз зачем вам эта фигня но держите Неон:Чаек (сегодня без моего юза) ТГК:https://t.me/angiam ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
custom 53323468574252421006❤3⚡1
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] — Это пока 1 часть, не волнуйтесь, 2 часть тоже будет! Добавляла рандомно НеАнон, Тиффани ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
🕊5❤3💘1
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] — Ребят, у меня идея, скиньте своих фп под этим постом, а я посмотрю, какие голоса персонажей из бравл старсс да, им подойдут НеАнон, Тиффани ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
❤🔥6custom 53323468574252421002
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Боброго дня или утра У меня прекрасное настроение, тьак что покидайте своих персонажей и я нарисую их в каких-нибудь новогодних костюмах А то прям очень хочется ❤️ ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
❤🔥5❤1🍓1
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Ладно, ещй на последок небольшой шип с ос×канон Тгк: @ka1ven_s ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
❤5
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Несколько карточек для моих друзяшек (сорян, что не для всех) Можете покидать своих фп и я для пары сделаю. Желательно написать хоть что-то про фп и подписаться на мой тгк;) Мой тгк: https://t.me/+iQGj1t2ZspAwNDZi ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
❤7
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] Мне кажется или это слишком плохо всё 🤤 Неанон Антивирусность @technoViruss ... @Tloccf_bot @technolikeoc || •#ТЕЙК
❤2custom 53323468574252421001
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
ᯏ 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 [ 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 ] ТРУ АМ АМ✅✅✅ФЕЙК КОЛЛАБ!! скетчила рандомную мысль и подумала…а что если сделать с этого фейк коллаб😱😱😱или как оно у вас там по-модному называется. 🧟♀️🧟♀️. буду ОЧ рада если кто-нибудь всё же подрисуется!! ограничений никаких НЕТ!! можете делать с этим чебупелем на вилке всё что вздумается - можете схавать, можете выкинуть, а можете вообще нахер всю композицию пересобачить…
❤4🍓2
Signed Технолайк ос кф предложка
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @technolikeoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Конкурс! | Технолайк ос cf!!” (@technolikeoc), 428 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technolikeoc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.