Channel
@teknodefance
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,743subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002037435526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teknodefance |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teknodefance |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 1,743 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 1,747 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 1,750 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 1,752 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 1,759 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 1,764 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 1,771 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 1,773 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,776 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 1,771 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 24.2% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Savaş analiz Raporları iranın böyle giderse savaştan önceki füze kapasitesine bir kaç ay sonra yeniden erişebileceği yönünde... İran uluslararası üretim hattı ve yer altı üretim hatlarıyla daha önce amerikan ordusunun karşı karşıya kalmadığı bir füze stoğu ile Amerika'yı tanıştırmış oldu.
👏4🥰1
2031 🤣
😁2
ABD, Lockheed Martin şirketine, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri (BAE) için ek Configuration 3 THAAD fırlatma sistemleri üretmek üzere 211,4 milyon dolarlık bir sözleşme verdi. Bu projenin tamamlanma tarihi ise Ocak 2031 olarak belirlendi.
Posted without readable text
Gizemli bir uçak, Kansas'taki McConnell Hava Üssü üzerinde görüldü. Bu durum, Amerika'nın maliyetli ve en gizli B-21 Raider savaş uçağının nadir bir görüntüsü olabileceği yönünde spekülasyonlara yol açtı
Posted without readable text
USS George Washington (CVN-73), USS Shoup (DDG-86) ve USS Robert Smalls (CG-62) gemileri, Singapur Boğazı'ndan batıya doğru geçiş yaptı. George Washington uçak gemisi, şu anda İran'a karşı görevde bulunan ve mürettebatının giderek umutsuzlaştığı ve intihar eğilimi gösterdiği USS Abraham Lincoln gemisinin yerine geçebilir.
👍1
WSJ: Ukraynalı insansız hava aracı birlikleri, Almanya'da yapılan büyük bir tatbikatta, bir Amerikan zırhlı tugayını önemli ölçüde mağlup etti. Ukraynalı operatörler, Amerikan araçlarını hızla tespit etti ve ardından patlayıcı ve FPV (First Person View) insansız hava araçlarıyla imha ettiklerini simüle etti; bu kadar etkili bir şekilde ki, Amerikan birlikleri defalarca "yeniden canlandırılmak" zorunda kaldı.
❤4
Savaşın son aşamalarında, İranlılar, Amerikan uçaklarının yakınında konuşlandırılan insansız hava araçları (drone) sürülerini kullanarak, bu uçakların hareketleri hakkında istihbarat topladı ve bu bilgileri, yerdeki ekiplere ileterek, bu ekiplerin de yer-hava füze sistemleriyle bir F-15 savaş uçağını düşürmesini sağladı. Bu taktiğin, Ukrayna'daki savaşın gözlemlenmesiyle öğrenildiği görülüyor
❤3
New York Times, iki ABD yetkilisine atıfta bulunarak: Temmuz ayındaki Ürdün üssüne yapılan saldırılar sırasında, tek bir günde yaklaşık 50 adet Patriot füzesi ateşlendi. Her birinin maliyeti yaklaşık 4 milyon dolar. İran, rotasını değiştiren füzeler kullanarak bu harcamayı zorladı.
👏1
İran yapımı "Majid" (AD-08) hava savunma sistemleri, Ermenistan Silahlı Kuvvetleri'nde hizmette. Karabağ savaşının ardından Türkiye ve İranın Ermenistan ile ilişkilerinde iyileşme ve ticari anlaşmalar artış gösteriyor
#SONDAKİKA Bir Türk F-16'sı eğitim sırasında düştü, pilot fırlatma koltuğuyla güvenli bir şekilde kurtuldu. @enfomerkezturkiye
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @teknodefance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TEKNO DEFANCE 🇹🇷” (@teknodefance), 1,743 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teknodefance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.