Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tekrargar

Channel

Tekrargar

@tekrargar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,435subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471773146
TypeChannel
Username@tekrargar
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tekrargar

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4332,4672,4506 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,466 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,460 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,463 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,459 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,452 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,445 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,440 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,433 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,437 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,435 subscribers2,4356 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,428–2,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 14:412,435-2
12 Sept 2026, 02:592,437+4
7 Sept 2026, 19:572,433-7
2 Sept 2026, 15:552,440-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:452,445-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:582,452-5
21 Aug 2026, 00:562,457-2
17 Aug 2026, 16:262,459-4
14 Aug 2026, 08:162,463+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:212,460-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:552,466-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:042,467first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50m 00s
Average length
25m 00s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29082.2%
👏3610.2%
🤯164.53%
😱30.85%
🙈20.567%
🤔20.567%
🫡20.567%
👎10.283%
🤷‍♂10.283%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tekrargar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 April 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC568 views13 reactions50 Starsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/mV2AQ8OYNT8?is=PnRzFnLOzm4IeZqb دوستان این ویدئو را سعی کنید چند بار مشاهده بفرمایید باور کنید اگر این موضوع را خوب درک بکنید کیفیت زندگی، شغل، رابطه و … افزایش پیدا می کند. @Tekrargar

👍13

18 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

چین در راستای تلاش برای آماده‌سازی جهت ورود به عصر هوش مصنوعی، ۱۲,۰۰۰ رشته دانشگاهی «منسوخ‌شده» را حذف کرد. بسیاری از مدرک‌های دانشگاهی در آینده تا حد زیادی بی‌اهمیت و بی‌فایده خواهند بود. @Tekrargar

👍21

21 May 2026, 22:58 UTC≈2,420 views30 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

موج دیگری از اخراج‌های دسته‌جمعی: < کلیک‌آپ (ClickUp): ۲۲٪ تعدیل < متا (Meta): ۱۰٪ تعدیل < اینتوئیت (Intuit): ۲۲٪ تعدیل < کوین‌بیس (Coinbase): ۱۴٪ تعدیل < آمازون (Amazon): ۱۰٪ تعدیل < بلاک (Block): ۴۰٪ تعدیل اگر تا الان متوجه نشده‌اید، اولویت شماره یک شما باید تسلط بر هوش مصنوعی باشد. @Tekrargar

👍30

17 May 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,530 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💡 کلید طلایی هوش مصنوعی: کانتکست (Context) چیست؟ آیا تا حالا شده از هوش مصنوعی سوال بپرسید و جواب‌های کلی و بی‌ربط بگیرید؟ مشکل از هوش مصنوعی نیست، مشکل از نبودِ Context یا همان «بافتار و زمینه» است! بیا ساده‌ش کنیم: هوش مصنوعی مثل یک کارمند نابغه اما بدون حافظه است. اگر بهش بگی «برام یه متن بنویس»، نمی‌دونه برای کی، با چه لحنی و با چه هدفی! کانتکست یعنی دادنِ «نقشه راه» به AI. ✅ اجزای یک کانتکست حرفه‌ای (فرمول Con

👍31

13 May 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,920 views39 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

یک مشکلی که من با هوش مصنوعی پیدا کردم این آخرا حس گناه هست یا شاید یک حس کم کاری کردن. یعنی چی؟ یعنی وقتی که یک کاری را با هوش مصنوعی انجام میدم که قبلا باید براش ۳ الی ۵ ساعت وقت صرف می کردم و الان توی ۳ الی ۵ دقیقه انجام میشه حس میکنم که کار را درست انجام ندادم. 😂😂 میگم نکنه دارم کم کاری میکنم!؟ 😉 به تازگی شروع کردم برای یک سری کارهای تکراری ایجنت های مختلف توصه دادم و آن ایجینتها دقیقا کار خودم را انجام می دهند و

👍32👏4🤔2🙈1

11 May 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,870 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

یک دستار درست کردم که هر ایده استارتاپی بهش بدی را برات نقد میکنه و میگه که اگر ایده ای که داری را با این شرایط ببری توی بازار آیا جواب میده یا نه اگر دوست داشتید چکش کنید روی Gems های جیمنای کار میکنه باید ریکوئست بدید دسترسی را براتون فعال کنم. فعلا دارم روش کار میکنم برای همین پابلیک نکردمش روی این آدرس می تونید پیداش کنید. http://tekrargar.com/aistartup @Tekrargar

👍21

7 May 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,810 views28 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

نمی دانم این پیغام ها را اگر ۲ یا ۳ سال آینده ببینم به چی فکر خواهم کرد. اما الان که دارم هر روز در مورد آینده هوش مصنوعی مطالعه میکنم همه چیز برام عجیب تر و عجیبت تر میشه! این حجم از خلاقیت بسیار عجیب است و ترسناک! @Tekrargar

👍27👎1

6 May 2026, 22:17 UTC≈1,790 views33 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

امروز یک محصول جدید هوش مصنوعی را برام پرزنت کردن مغزم سوت کشید!!! یک هوش مصنوعی درست کردند که کارهای تخصصی یک شرکت را انجام میده مثل مدیرعامل٬ مدیر فنی٬ مدیر حسابداری حتی طراحان و غیره. بعد این هوش مصنوعی در هر کدام از حوزه ها از یک مدل زبانی استفاده می کند و برای بعضی از ساب تسک ها هم مدل دیگر. قشنگ یک دنیای مجازی از ایجنت ها داخل یک پلتفرم برای پیاده کردن کارهای یک شرکت. رسما می تونم بگم داریم نابود میشیم توسط خود

🤯15👍14😱3🙈1

29 Apr 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,980 views5 reactions52 Starsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/X3Y9_3LqDWM یک پادکست جدید در کانال یوتیوب تکرارگر پادکست

👍5

29 Apr 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,620 views15 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

هوش مصنوعی یک طوری داره رشد میکنه که اگر فقط بخوای ابزارهایی که با هوش مصنوعی کار می کنند را یادبگیری و ببینی مدلهای هوش مصنوعی چه مدلی کار می کنند وقت کم میاری!

👍15

29 Apr 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,590 views16 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

خواستم تشکر کنم از این دوستی که به مطالب با استار واکنش نشان میده. دمت گرم بابت انرژی مثبتی که میدی.

👏15👍1

25 Apr 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,840 views14 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

چگونه در سال ۲۰۲۶ از هوش مصنوعی در کسب و کار خود استفاده کنیم؟ لینک مشاهده ویدئو انگلیسی: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr78adfAnuA @Tekrargar_research

👍12🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tekrargar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Michael Hashemian
@Michaellhashemian · 39,271
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
تحلیل بیت‌کوین طالس
@ProfessionalBitcoinDaily · 23,672
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tekrargar” (@tekrargar), 2,435 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tekrargar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.