Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,049–12,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:02
12,341
+20
16 Sept 2026, 01:38
12,321
+9
14 Sept 2026, 06:55
12,312
+11
12 Sept 2026, 13:18
12,301
+10
10 Sept 2026, 12:18
12,291
+23
7 Sept 2026, 09:20
12,268
+24
4 Sept 2026, 14:41
12,244
-1
3 Sept 2026, 01:28
12,245
+3
2 Sept 2026, 00:44
12,242
+13
1 Sept 2026, 02:34
12,229
+13
30 Aug 2026, 22:23
12,216
+12
29 Aug 2026, 20:07
12,204
+10
28 Aug 2026, 18:09
12,194
+8
27 Aug 2026, 19:13
12,186
+13
26 Aug 2026, 16:49
12,173
-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:12
12,174
+2
24 Aug 2026, 19:27
12,172
-2
23 Aug 2026, 05:02
12,174
+3
21 Aug 2026, 20:27
12,171
-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:23
12,172
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 12,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
58 (20 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
56,793
Reactions total
1,374
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,669 reactions across 58 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,300
49.3%
👍
1,322
28.3%
👎
470
10.1%
😁
411
8.80%
😐
166
3.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 58 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teledent_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
هرسال سر اینکه نادندانپزشکان حضور در اکسیدا. دارن داستان میشه یا اینکه یه نادندانپزشک جلو دوربین میرقصه کلی هیاهو به پا میشه
درسته
بده
خیلی هم بده
ولس اون تجربی کاری که داره بیمارشو میبینه
اون آرایشگری که زیبایی کار میکنه
اینا چیه تکلیفشون
همه شهرای ایرانم حضور دارن
چرا با اینا بر خوردی نمیشه
چرا اینا رسانه ای نمیشن
همینان که با مفهون کنترل عفونت واستریلیزاسیون آشنایی ندارن .
یکم چشامونو بازتر کنیم یهتره ....
در ایزولیشن دوتا کانسپت داریم
رول پنبه فنا
رابر فنا
حالا بنظرتون رول پنبه میتونه اون ایزولیشن ایده عال برای درمان ریشه رو فراهم کنه ؟
توی یک مقاله که به بررسی روش های ایزولیشن پرداخته بود ایزولیشن با رابردم را بهترین و ایده عال ترین حالت ذکر کرده بود
حالا یه سوال در ذهن ما شکل میگیره
آیا ماکه به هر دلیلی نمیتونی رابردم استفاده کنیم با رول پنبه میشه ایزولیشن جهت درمان ریشه رو فراهم کنیم
پاسخ سوال بله هستش
ولی چند تا ش…
نکته بلیچینگی پلاس:
۱.برای اینکه gingival protecter کنده نشه و لثه نسوزه حتما ۲۵ -۳۰ ثانیه کیورش کنید و ۰.۵-۱ میلی متر از دندون رو علاوه بر لثه ، باهاش بپوشونید و قبل از قرار دادنش حتما لثه رو خشک کنید
۲.دو هفته بعد بلیچینگ ، میتونید کامپوزیت کنید تا مشکلی در باند ایجاد نشه.
۳.اول بلیچ_> دو هفته صبر _> ترمیم کامپوزیت یا درمان زیبایی
چرا؟؟؟
۱.تثبیت رنگ دندان و انتخاب رنگ مناسب کامپوزیت
۲.جلوگیری از دباند کامپوزیت
…
دومورد در قطعات مربوط به به ایمپلنت نیاز به تورک دادن با رچت نیست.
1. هیلینگ :به هیچ وجه با رچت تورک نیاز نداره وهمون تورکی که دستمون وارد می کنه کافیه
2.ایمپرشن :برای قالبگیری ایمپلنت ها که اونم با همون تورک دست کافیه و هنگامی که ایمپرشن تکان نخورد وبه اصطلاح جای خودش فیکس شده بود یعنی دیگه کافیه.
کانال دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام کاملا رایگان برای همه دانشجویان و دندانپزشکان محترم مطالب قرار میده
لازم به ذکره که درحال حاضر تبلیغات پذیرفته نمیشود و تبلیغاتی که در پایین ترین پست ها مشاهده می کنین ،پلتفرم تلگرام خودش قرار میده وما هیچ نظری روی تبلیغات نداریم.
یه قبل وبعد با یکی از اعضای کانال 😁
چند روز پیش از من در خصوص ریتریت پرسید و استرس اولین ریتریت رو داشت
پله به پله بهش گفتم
البته تلاش خودش بودکه تونست عملیش کنه😉
هم اکنون اکسیدا
دکترعزیز و دوست داشتنی جناب اقای مهدی جوان
در سالن اصلی واقع در طبقه E1
❤57👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @teledent_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای برطرف کردن موانع کرونالی از چی استفاده میکنین؟
اوریفیس شیپر64%
گیتس25%
فایل دستی شماره بالا19%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
علوم پایه پزشکی و دندانپزشکی @oloompaye · 22,759 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام” (@teledent_school), 12,341 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teledent_school.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.