Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام

Channel

دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام

@teledent_school

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,524subscribers

+437 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001900482309
TypeChannel
Username@teledent_school
Descriptionمحمد حسین بیگی @mh_beigi_80 "تیم دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام"
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/teledent_school

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,08712,52512,3067 August 2026 — 12,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,112 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,130 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,137 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,140 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,172 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,174 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,172 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,174 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,173 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,194 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,204 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,216 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,229 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,242 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,245 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,244 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,268 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,291 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,301 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,312 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,321 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,341 subscribers30 September 2026 — 12,377 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,374 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,387 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,401 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,413 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,419 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,425 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,426 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,421 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,423 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,448 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,467 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,471 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,480 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,477 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,480 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,487 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,509 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,510 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,514 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,520 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,525 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,522 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,524 subscribers12,5247 August 20265 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net +437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,021–12,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:4012,524+2
4 Nov 2026, 11:5412,522-3
3 Nov 2026, 13:4012,525+5
2 Nov 2026, 16:1012,520+6
1 Nov 2026, 15:4612,514+4
31 Oct 2026, 13:0412,510+1
30 Oct 2026, 11:4712,509+22
28 Oct 2026, 15:2012,487+7
26 Oct 2026, 11:3012,480+3
25 Oct 2026, 09:1612,477-3
24 Oct 2026, 07:4612,480+9
23 Oct 2026, 04:1812,471+4
22 Oct 2026, 04:3512,467+19
20 Oct 2026, 22:2712,448+25
19 Oct 2026, 21:3412,423+2
18 Oct 2026, 23:4412,421-5
17 Oct 2026, 20:2612,426+1
16 Oct 2026, 21:3812,425+6
15 Oct 2026, 22:4712,419+6
14 Oct 2026, 22:1412,413first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 12,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,600
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held79 (20 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total117,670
Reactions total2,928
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
263
Videos
15
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7,597 reactions across 79 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,02339.8%
👍2,47832.6%
👎1,08814.3%
😁6067.98%
😐3985.24%
😈40.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,597 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 79 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teledent_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,650 views264 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

اکسس کانزرواتیو به بهای جای گذاری پالپ چمبر!!! بنظرتون این روش اوکیه؟

👎199👍36😐27😁2

2 Nov 2026, 04:05 UTC≈3,780 views118 reactionsread 6 November 2026

یه درمان ریشه میبینین به طول ،تیپر عالی ،خیلی تمیز به نظر میاد حالا بعد دوسال ضایعه داده یه سوال پیش میاد یبار یکی ازین کیس هارو که کشیده بودن من ریششو با فرز برش دادم و واقعا تراکم گوتا ی خوبی داشت حالا بنظرتون چی میشه مقالات چنتا دلیلو بیان میکنن عدم استفاده از هیپوکلریت سدیم وشست وشوی موثر در کانال(تا ۲ میلی متری اپیکال فورامن) عدم استریل کردن گوتاها راجع به گوتاها میخوام براتون صحبت کنم

❤101👍17

30 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC≈4,310 views121 reactionsread 6 November 2026

آرزوی موفقیت واسه دوستان آزمون صلاحیت بالینی دارم🌹

❤101😁9😐7👎3👍1

29 Oct 2026, 19:51 UTC≈6,060 views158 reactionsread 6 November 2026

از عجایب هیپو همین بس که تو کانال باید اکتیوش کنیم ولی روی شلوار نو از قبل اکتیوه!

😁141❤9👍8

27 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈5,810 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

؟

  1. VRF31%
  2. آبسه حاد پریودنتال6%
  3. آبسه مزمن اندودنتال7%
  4. ضایعه ترکیبی اندو -پریو61%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤14

27 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈5,460 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

بنظرتون دندان ۴پایین چه مشکلی ایجاد شده؟

❤6

26 Oct 2026, 10:10 UTC≈5,520 views85 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

تعیین طول کارکرد بر اساس اپیکال کانستریکشنه دوتا راه داره برای تعیین ac ۱. دندونو بکشیم و ببینیم ۲. استفاده از اپکس لوکیتور برای همینه که وقتی بین تعیین طول اپکس و گرافی شک میکنیم اپکس لوکیتور رو مرجع قرار میدیم... نکته خیلی مهمیه

❤68😁13😈4

26 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC≈4,900 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

دندان ۵ بالا پالپو انجام شده و این وضعیت بسیار بد قراردهی کویت (پانسمان موقت) هستش به واضحی لیکج مشخصه ....

❤22👎1

23 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈5,480 views231 reactionsread 6 November 2026

جدیدا یه سریا هر دندونی بی حس نمیشن میرن سراغ آرتیکائین.... بنظرتون درسته این کار؟ اینکه لیدوکائین نمیتونه بی حسی مورد نظر رو به دست بیاره نباید یهو بریم سراغ تغییر داروی بی حسی حالا اینجا چیکار میتونیم انجام بدیم؟ استفاده از تکنیک های بلاک عصبی استفاده از تکنیک های مکمل کتاب رفرنس های مرتبط با درمان ریشه ترتیب بی حسی های مکمل رو با ترتیب زیر بیان می کنه ۱.داخل استخوانی ۲.لیگامال پریودنتال ۳. داخل پالپی حالا چون برای…

👍202❤22👎7

19 Oct 2026, 22:21 UTC≈6,540 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026

قطع گوتای نادرست در دندانهای قدامی اندو شده دلیل اصلی تغییر رنگ دندان میباشد حالا تغییر رنگ رخ داد حالا چه اقدامی باید انجام بدیم؟ قطع گوتای اصولی قرار دهی بریر مناسب اینترنال بلیچینگ

❤58👍3

19 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC≈6,190 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026

عدم رعایت تیپرینگ مناسب(حالت پارالل داره) سیل اپیکال در این کیس با پلاگ mta برقرار میشده نه گوتا سایز بزرگ! قطع گوتا بشدت بد" در دندان های قدامی قطع گوتا در حد cej یا حتی ۱میلیمتر پایین تر کات شود. واسه ترمیم هم پوسیدگی جا گذاشته بوده "رعایت این نکته خیلی مهمه "

❤36😁1

18 Oct 2026, 22:09 UTC≈6,230 views115 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

این ازون اندو ربع ساعتیاس

😐93😁14👍5❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @teledent_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @teledent_school as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTCAnonymous Poll1,510 voters approx.

؟

  1. VRF31%
  2. آبسه حاد پریودنتال6%
  3. آبسه مزمن اندودنتال7%
  4. ضایعه ترکیبی اندو -پریو61%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

برای برطرف کردن موانع کرونالی از چی استفاده میکنین؟

  1. اوریفیس شیپر64%
  2. گیتس25%
  3. فایل دستی شماره بالا19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,460 voters approx.

اگر بیمارتون آسپرین مصرف میکنه واسه جراحی افزایش طول تاج نیازی به قطع کردن دارد؟

  1. بله33%
  2. خیر68%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,110 voters approx.

اگر فضا بین پست و دندان بود ما باید چیکار کنیم؟

  1. قالبگیری مجدد53%
  2. پر کردن با آمالگام یا هر مواد رستوریتیو8%
  3. با سمان لوتینگ44%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

؟

  1. ۱10%
  2. ۲92%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کتاب صوتی | فارسی پاد
@farsi_pod · 20,847
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
علوم پایه پزشکی و دندان‌پزشکی
@oloompaye · 22,140
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام” (@teledent_school), 12,524 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teledent_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.