Channel
@telega_vladika
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
676subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001203377204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @telega_vladika |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/telega_vladika |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 676 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 678 | -2 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 680 | -1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 681 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
560 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 228 | 40.7% | |
| 🔥 | 212 | 37.9% | |
| custom 5352732357054963148 | 39 | 6.96% | |
| custom 5461152510020427093 | 26 | 4.64% | |
| custom 5352865784508980799 | 25 | 4.46% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 3.21% | |
| custom 5242256349273800619 | 12 | 2.14% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 560 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telega_vladika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2024 to 11 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Готовим 15 кейсов на Behance, много хороших и не хороших)) Первый кейс пошел — https://www.behance.net/gallery/227898321/sajt-pod-kljuch-dlja-klingovoj-kompanii — Один из крайних и простеньких сайтов Поддержите 🫰
custom 546115251002042709312👍5
Всем халлоу, мы кароче решили запустить шото типо реалити, где показываем как работаем над проектами От получения заявки до сдачи проекта с постоплатой 💸 Все эти этапы и процессы оказания услуги будет показывать Если хочешь чет для себя полезное подчерпнуть, то залетай к нам — https://t.me/+Exxoq1YmpIM5Zjcy 🥳
🔥3custom 53527323570549631483
Ребят, а вы подписаны на наш канал по дизайну?) Скоро будет 6 месяцев как мы его ведем👇🏼 @starlozhka @starlozhka Если не подписаны, то почему? Если че, я чисто для себя узнаю. Планирую этот канал сделать личным дневником 🤣💅 Есть много мыслей по дизайну и фрилансу в целом, которые хотел бы поразгонять с вами в рамках этого канала в подобном формате)
custom 53527323570549631489
Кто-нибудь продавал свои услуги в рассрочку?)) Я реально если че 😂 Клиент такой приходит, говорит дорого/не выделен такой бюджет. Ты ему: "У меня есть банковская рассрочка". А он берет и соглашается? Очень интересно) если у кого-то было, то напишите в комменты 🙏🏼 интересно пообщаться
custom 535273235705496314810custom 53528657845089807994🔥3
Ребят) мы сегодня наш курс изисайт закрываем Осталось 2 часа, поэтому кто давно думал и интересовался вот ссылка на сайт со всей инфой — izisite.ru Так сказать в последний вагон) А вообще выгодно закрываться, все сразу покупают обильно 😂 Может концепцию санлайта попробовать ахахах
🔥8
Из последних новостей: я набрал 10 кг, хз заметно ли это на видосах) Из плюсов у меня перестали спрашивать паспорт в магазинах 😂 А из минусов хз, морда по фейстайму отекшая всегда 😅 У меня еще куплены 2 абонемента в зал (туда я конечно же не хожу), чисто как оберег лежат Считайте меня инвестором ахахха💰 Наш канал по дизайну
❤16custom 52422563492738006192
В догонку к кейсу выше. На ютуб выложил видос как делался этот сайт: дизайн, общение с клиентом, стоимость и тд хотел сделать видос легким на просмотр, помогите его в массы двинуть плиз 😀 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3htIBFdCCY&t
🔥12❤1
кароче, мы тут решили тестить площадку dprofile поддержите пожалуйста лайком кейсик наш новый — https://dprofile.ru/case/95977/lending-dlia-biznesa-sneki-eda-dostavka обещаюсь отписать потом че как по заявкам будет с него Наш канал по дизайну
❤16
«Перезаписываю нахуй» Моя фобия №1 в записи видосов на обучении — это случайно НЕ вырезать моменты, где я могу матюкнуться, рыгнуть и тд 😂 Как говорится.. Чем больше чего-то боишься, тем с большей вероятностью это произойдет Так и произошло, Саша (ученик), смотря видос нашел такой ляп в одном из уроков на Бусти))
❤32custom 52422563492738006197custom 53528657845089807994custom 54611525100204270934custom 53527323570549631482
Канал переезжает, а вы едете со мной ребята! 🧳 Мы воссоздали общий канал по дизайну с Никитой — @starlozhka Там мы будем делиться контентом по дизайну, сайтам, заработку и все что около 🪙 Текущий канал будет как личный. Для лайфа. Для мыслей вне работы. Так же скоро в новом канале запустим челлендж по упаковке портфолио и привлечению клиентов, ю а вэлком — @starlozhka 🔼🔼🔼
🔥10custom 52422563492738006193custom 53528657845089807993👍1
Влад Ложкин › Дизайн и маркетинг pinned a GIF
Образование — херня? Вчера мне написала участница «Дизайн-буста» с таким отзывом: Мне нравится, как вы уроки даете, правда только два посмотрела)) Но и этого хватило, чтобы пересмотреть насколько у меня все плохо Училась в универе на дизайнера, но там преподавали довольно посредственно и предметы вело старшее поколение, которое далеко от современного дизайна У меня есть подобная история) Я поступал в универ на п…
❤32🔥12👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @telega_vladika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
делаем?😅
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 11 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Влад Ложкин › Дизайн и маркетинг” (@telega_vladika), 676 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telega_vladika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.