These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
9.3 average views per post against 8,806 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.106%. Across the 12,093 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.56% and 20.1%, with a median of 10.9%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (10 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Posts measured
53 of 53 published in the window (53 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
495
Mature posts only
0.123% over 37 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,768–9,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 15:56
8,806
-28
1 Sept 2026, 15:45
8,834
-24
29 Aug 2026, 14:06
8,858
-19
27 Aug 2026, 00:27
8,877
-28
24 Aug 2026, 02:58
8,905
-32
20 Aug 2026, 18:25
8,937
-23
18 Aug 2026, 04:42
8,960
-36
14 Aug 2026, 22:24
8,996
-43
11 Aug 2026, 05:22
9,039
-19
8 Aug 2026, 00:00
9,058
-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:01
9,061
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:53
9,061
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.106%
avg views ÷ 8,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.3
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
53
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
84 (22 May 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
495
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 52s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Ксюша ШГШ 🤤
Та самая актриса, недавно рассталась со своим ёбырем, а он уже после, сл*л откровенные кружки и д*м*шку с ней в сеть. Хуя се у неё сиськи, кстати. 3 раза уже подрочил.. 😳
ПАК С МАТЕРИАЛОМ ⬇️
https://t.me/+KsTPwzhGaaVhMDQ5
[🌟]Хорни джирайка зарегистрировалась в тг
(вместо мах) и ищет своего властного хозяина ⤵️
https://t.me/+iKc4xvQs8CVjMzY6
https://t.me/+iKc4xvQs8CVjMzY6
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀
•16:30 трахаю попку кисточкой
•17:50 сосу братику за конфетки🎀
перейди в мой хорни канальчик или напиши мне
@evasuka67
🎀
😭 Мелстрой задонатил 500.000₽ Свете Соллар прямо во время эфира...
Условие доната было простым — разд#ться прямо перед камерой. Света не долго думая выполнила челлендж на глазах у тысяч зрителей. Модераторы Twitch заб@нили трансляцию и ее аккаунт буквально через 2 минуты, но мой знакомый успел сделать запись.
🔞 Смотреть запись того самого момента📥
https://t.me/+liL3U1FVbf9mYWFhh
https://t.me/+liL3U1FVbf9mYWFh
Блогepшу которая оскорбляла участников СВО пoймали. Жестоко yнизили, зaставили сесть на бутылку и делать минирование рта троим.
Полное видео уже разместили в нашем канале 👇
https://t.me/+TaG2le4FoQ1hNjAy
МЫ НАШЛИ МЕСТО ГДЕ ЛЮДИ ПОКАЗЫВАЮТ СВОИ ТРИПЫ
💀WORLD OF TRIP — закрытый канал, где люди сами показывают последствия своего отдыха пока их не посадят либо пока не сд#х#т от передоза.
Бэдтрипы, вписки, клады, невменяемые шлюхи и весь ад трипов
*Подписка уменьшает риск сторчаться на 85%
💀САМЫЙ СТРАШНЫЙ КАНАЛ ПРО ВЕЩЕСТВА - https://t.me/+8Vu0c31NVyAyMjUy
Сучки будут течь от одного твоего присутствия
Ведь ты подписан на канал НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ, где мужской психолог делится методиками, как вызвать фонтан между ног у любой бабы.
10-15 минут телефонного разговора и она надевает своё лучшее белье, вызывает такси и едет к тебе.
Наши подписчики на фото 👆 Хочешь так же?
Подписывайся и используй: https://t.me/+2wHGWcGrt5gwODAy
🤡 Абсолютно идиотское решение — закинуть мне в предложку свой проторченный еб#альник...
Вновь под чем-то — мой гигачадовский сборник отборного трэша с перед#зами в лайве, экстремальным съёмом адресов на камеру в людных местах и всем тем, что делает из нормального человека н#рко-животное.
Подписывайся чтоб никогда не подсесть! — https://t.me/+Q5s9Y4Ro84QxMzdi
Хакнули минет Дашу Дошик 🔞(экслюзив)
подписчик прислал нам экслюзив, какой-то хакер взломал платный канал Дошик и скачал оттуда будущие посты Даши, которые она загрузила, скорее забирайте бесплатно то, что скоро у неё выйдет за деньги 🎁
КАНАЛ С МАТЕРИАЛАМИ ⬇️
https://t.me/+wjONyUe18aI2ZmZh
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @temkisviob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@temkisviob named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@staresq named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Темки / обои / авы” (@temkisviob), 8,806 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temkisviob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.