Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Влад Тен

Channel

Влад Тен

@tenfoundation

Not marked by Telegram, checked 31 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,159subscribers

+357 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221961360
TypeChannel
Username@tenfoundation
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tenfoundation

Growth

8,7859,1598,9726 August 2026 — 8,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,803 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,791 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,785 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,846 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,903 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,962 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,965 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,975 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,050 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,122 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,159 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net +357. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,729–9,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:369,159+37
3 Sept 2026, 01:289,122+72
31 Aug 2026, 06:469,050+75
28 Aug 2026, 05:488,975+10
25 Aug 2026, 10:098,965+3
22 Aug 2026, 06:398,962+59
18 Aug 2026, 14:298,903+57
15 Aug 2026, 16:128,846+61
12 Aug 2026, 09:228,785-6
9 Aug 2026, 11:318,791-12
6 Aug 2026, 18:558,803+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:018,802no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:048,802first reading

Engagement

139 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 9,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,720
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
107
of 139 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held139 (18 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total372,380
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 14s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 28 August 2026

Кто какой персентиль получил в доте?

27 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Can you hear the music (Oppenheimer OST) ioio acoustic autistic cover про рафт было слишком заумное видео поэтому восстанавливаю интеллектуальный баланс

27 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

готовлю большое видео по интро в cuda (feat. ЕК) вот вам сниппет

27 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

а если без шуток мне правда стыдно у меня такое чувство, что я всех подвел вокруг и на мне как булыжник висит я правда работаю над собой

27 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC≈4,710 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

когда разочаровал всех вокруг, сам себя и даже самых преданных подписчиков 💔 я исправлюсь, дайте мне еще один шанс

27 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,490 viewsread 28 August 2026

Если кому интересно как я использую оракула (великий язык модель) в своем обучении 1. Поиск источников, Гугл выдача настолько захламлена SEO блевотиной, что ты проберешься через 10 мусорных постов на медиуме - пока добреешься до того, что тебе надо Правда чатжпт (подставь тут свое) любит выдавать старые версии документации, надо чекать 2. Факт чекинг, вычитка, выписка - что забыл, что стоило добавить учесть 3. Об

27 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кажется люди стали забывать, что я не только 🤡

27 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈4,170 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Распределенные системы Consensus Raft https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc _______________ промо код на полный курс по базам данных и системному дизайну RAFTING https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=swbT_pc_RAFTING _______________ Материалы: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consensus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_(computer_science) https://en.

26 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 26 August 2026

Если кто-то захочет мне набить ебучку, приходите на опен ринг в сентябре Напишите сюда в комментарии Я вас в пару поставлю к себе Или найду кого-то https://www.instagram.com/ubc.uz Там есть инфа

Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @tenfoundation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tenfoundation edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Poll406 voters

Финал Инта завтра

  1. Спирит67%
  2. Пари39%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz512 voters

Почувствовали?

  1. Мнимое (мнит из себя, фейк)21%
  2. Imaginary (воображаемое, образ, вдохновение)79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Digital Ниндзя
@digital_ninjaa · 39,835
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Alek OS
@Alek_OS · 32,987
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Диджитализируй!
@t0digital · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,688
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Рефералки в IT | Вакансии и резюме
@refer_me_it · 30,670
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влад Тен” (@tenfoundation), 9,159 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tenfoundation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.