https://youtu.be/zeiywBa4AYE?si=ES3v4WvVDrQ5v7LP

Channel
Влад Тен
@tenfoundation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,159subscribers
+357 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002221961360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tenfoundation |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tenfoundation |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 9,159 | +37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:28 | 9,122 | +72 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 9,050 | +75 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 8,975 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:09 | 8,965 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 8,962 | +59 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 8,903 | +57 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 8,846 | +61 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 8,785 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 8,791 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 8,803 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,802 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 8,802 | first reading |
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.7%
- avg views ÷ 9,159 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,720
- 100 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 107
- of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (18 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 372,380 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 14s
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Кто какой персентиль получил в доте?
Can you hear the music (Oppenheimer OST) ioio acoustic autistic cover про рафт было слишком заумное видео поэтому восстанавливаю интеллектуальный баланс
Posted without readable text
готовлю большое видео по интро в cuda (feat. ЕК) вот вам сниппет
а если без шуток мне правда стыдно у меня такое чувство, что я всех подвел вокруг и на мне как булыжник висит я правда работаю над собой
когда разочаровал всех вокруг, сам себя и даже самых преданных подписчиков 💔 я исправлюсь, дайте мне еще один шанс
Если кому интересно как я использую оракула (великий язык модель) в своем обучении 1. Поиск источников, Гугл выдача настолько захламлена SEO блевотиной, что ты проберешься через 10 мусорных постов на медиуме - пока добреешься до того, что тебе надо Правда чатжпт (подставь тут свое) любит выдавать старые версии документации, надо чекать 2. Факт чекинг, вычитка, выписка - что забыл, что стоило добавить учесть 3. Об…
Кажется люди стали забывать, что я не только 🤡
Распределенные системы Consensus Raft https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc https://youtu.be/WSXbeCtFhjc _______________ промо код на полный курс по базам данных и системному дизайну RAFTING https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=swbT_pc_RAFTING _______________ Материалы: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consensus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_(computer_science) https://en.…
https://t.me/vladematika/23
Если кто-то захочет мне набить ебучку, приходите на опен ринг в сентябре Напишите сюда в комментарии Я вас в пару поставлю к себе Или найду кого-то https://www.instagram.com/ubc.uz Там есть инфа
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @tenfoundation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tenfoundation edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Финал Инта завтра
- Спирит67%
- Пари39%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Почувствовали?
- Мнимое (мнит из себя, фейк)21%
- Imaginary (воображаемое, образ, вдохновение)79%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@digital_ninjaa · 39,835
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@Alek_OS · 32,987
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
@t0digital · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@extremecode · 35,688
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@refer_me_it · 30,670
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Влад Тен” (@tenfoundation), 9,159 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tenfoundation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.