Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,065–1,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 20:07
1,067
-2
27 Aug 2026, 20:16
1,069
-1
24 Aug 2026, 14:29
1,070
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:22
1,073
-4
14 Aug 2026, 05:37
1,077
-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:53
1,081
-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:06
1,083
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01
1,083
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,260 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
505
40.1%
🤣
329
26.1%
😁
122
9.68%
☃
103
8.17%
💩
77
6.11%
🔥
54
4.29%
😍
15
1.19%
🤡
15
1.19%
😨
7
0.556%
⚡
6
0.476%
🎉
4
0.317%
👍
4
0.317%
🤗
4
0.317%
😭
3
0.238%
🤔
3
0.238%
💊
2
0.159%
😐
2
0.159%
😱
2
0.159%
🙏
1
0.079%
🤯
1
0.079%
1 further kind
1
0.079%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,260 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
227
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
200
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teroline_live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Увы, шедевр 🥃
Признавать ошибки ранней эпохи аналитики не трудно, трудно было бы и дальше давить кишечник в попытках напридумывать минусы, основа которых базируется на:
1) хейте к сайфай
2) не смотрел ЗВ в детстве = похуй
3) настроение гавно
"на каком говне я смотрел этот шедевр" х67. Ну это уже реально рофл, с 4/10 дойти спустя 3 года до 9/10
А так это буквально лучшая часть ЗВ из существующих, если рассматриват…
Откровения не случилось, увы
Второй Эпизод ЗВ, по прежнему тягомотный кал на 4/10. Причем само кино в рамках франшизы имеет вес, как сюжетно, с точки зрения зарождения темной личности Энакина, как и глобальные лоровые моменты, пасхалки на будущие/прошлые фильмы.
Но тут хоть убей световым мечом, 2.5 часа любовных паст про песок, чтобы по итогу невнятно и скомкано рассказать любовную линию с Падме, поиски клонов им п…
Звёздные Войны, внезапно в Эру Добра оказались не калом
Это буквально первая полноценная реабилитация самой низкой оценки 1 до 6. Были рофлы относительно Шрека 3, что с 4 до 8 или Драйв с 4 до 7, но пока что Первый Эпизод ЗВ держит самый жесткий разрыв.
Я не знаю, на каком говне я сидел 3 года назад, чтобы поставить 1/10 и рассказывать получасовые пасты и в дальнейшем ссылаясь на эту "аналитику", но кино то оказало…
Кольца Власти, оказывается не закрыли 🏆🏆
Я так понимаю тактика после обвала 2-го сезона была такая, что надо просто не упоминать 2 года, что этот сериал существует, все рано или поздно заебутся обсуждать, какое это калище, ну и забудут про все каловые моменты соответственно
А так все маскоты сериала на месте:
1) Толстая черная гномиха
2) Карлица Галадриэль, что колоссально-нравственно страдает
3) Добрые орки
4) Арм…
Так мои любимые друзья, выселение переезд идет полным ходом, ну это ужас сколько и чего надо сделать(
Давайте наши гик-посиделки перенесем на завтра, посмотрим ЧП от Рейми и шлифанем мультиком 1994 (добивая 1 сезон)
Злые шутки про поездку в Японию собирают сотни реакций, посмотрим сколько наберет Добрая Канарейка 🙏
❤91🤣16💩11☃9😭3🎉2🤗2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @teroline_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CustomStories @customstories · 37,422 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1xГлебс” (@teroline_live), 1,067 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teroline_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.