Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐ŸŒ TERREMOTI Live 24 ๐ŸŒ‹

Channel

๐ŸŒ TERREMOTI Live 24 ๐ŸŒ‹

@terremotilive24

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

7,577subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001110154653
TypeChannel
Username@terremotilive24
Created16 July 2017 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/terremotilive24

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,5377,6187,577.56 August 2026 โ€” 7,537 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 7,537 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 7,539 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 7,545 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 7,555 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 7,596 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 7,605 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 7,618 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 7,609 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 7,608 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 7,600 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 7,598 subscribers11 September 2026 โ€” 7,592 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 7,586 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 7,577 subscribers7,5776 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,525โ€“7,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:187,577-9
15 Sept 2026, 06:597,586-6
11 Sept 2026, 05:367,592-6
6 Sept 2026, 15:157,598-2
1 Sept 2026, 22:157,600-8
29 Aug 2026, 14:037,608-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:487,609-9
23 Aug 2026, 11:457,618+13
19 Aug 2026, 17:347,605+9
16 Aug 2026, 19:167,596+41
12 Aug 2026, 23:097,555+10
10 Aug 2026, 01:057,545+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:517,539+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,537no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:167,537first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
22.7%
avg views รท 7,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.907%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held61 (2 August 2026 โ€“ 28 August 2026)
Views total17,195
Reactions total156
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

721 reactions across 60 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜ฑ25735.6%
๐Ÿ‘25034.7%
โค8912.3%
๐Ÿ˜ข446.10%
๐Ÿ™395.41%
๐Ÿ’”152.08%
๐Ÿ˜ญ121.66%
๐Ÿค”30.416%
๐Ÿ‘20.277%
๐Ÿ˜20.277%
๐Ÿคฌ20.277%
๐Ÿคฏ20.277%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.139%
๐Ÿ˜จ10.139%
๐Ÿฅฑ10.139%
๐Ÿฅด10.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC855 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Evento lieve in zona: Barga/Coreglia Antelminelli (LU) @Terremotilive24

โค5๐Ÿ‘2

28 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,300 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/47015162

๐Ÿ˜ฑ8๐Ÿ‘1

27 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTCโ‰ˆ1,530 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

26 agosto 2026: la frana in Nepal e lโ€™analisi dei sismogrammi https://ingvterremoti.com/2026/08/27/26-agosto-2026-la-frana-in-nepal-e-lanalisi-dei-sismogrammi/ Il 26 agosto 2026, un enorme blocco di ghiaccio e roccia si รจ staccato da un ghiacciaio al confine tra Nepal e Cina, precipitando per oltre un chilometro e generando โ€ฆ Read More (https://ingvterremoti.com/2026/08/27/26-agosto-2026-la-frana-in-nepal-e-lanalisiโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿค”2๐Ÿคฏ2๐Ÿ˜จ1

27 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTCโ‰ˆ1,730 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/47007692

๐Ÿ‘4

26 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,760 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

26 agosto 2026: la frana in Nepal ha sprigionato lโ€™energia di un terremoto di magnitudo 5.2 https://ingvterremoti.com/2026/08/26/26-agosto-2026-la-frana-in-nepal-ha-sprigionato-lenergia-di-un-terremoto-di-magnitudo-5-2/ Alle 02:52 ora UTC (8:37 ora locale in Nepal) del 26 agosto 2026, il Servizio Geologico USA (US Geological Survey, USGS) ha inizialmente segnalato una scossa di terremoto nella regione โ€ฆ Read More (hโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ˜ฑ13โค1๐Ÿ‘1

26 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTCโ‰ˆ1,380 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ultimora24

L'origine dell'alluvione lampo al confine tra Nepal e Tibet non รจ ancora stata definitivamente accertata. Secondo le prime ricostruzioni, un terremoto di magnitudo 4,4, registrato nella zona stamattina, potrebbe aver provocato una gigantesca frana o valanga di ghiaccio, che avrebbe ostruito il fiume causando un improvviso accumulo e successivo rilascio dell'acqua. Si parla anche di un possibile cedimento di un lago gโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ˜ฑ19โค3๐Ÿค”1

24 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTCโ‰ˆ2,050 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/46984472

๐Ÿ˜ฑ12๐Ÿ‘3

24 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTCโ‰ˆ2,180 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Dieci anni dalla sequenza in Italia centrale: cosa abbiamo imparato dalla scienza https://ingvterremoti.com/2026/08/24/dieci-anni-dalla-sequenza-in-italia-centrale-cosa-abbiamo-imparato-dalla-scienza/ Dieci anni fa, alle 3:36 del 24 agosto 2016, un terremoto di magnitudo 6.0 colpรฌ Amatrice, Accumoli e molti altri paesi dellโ€™Italia centrale. Non fu un evento isolato: segnรฒ lโ€™inizio โ€ฆ Read More (https://ingvterremoti.โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿ˜ข3โค1

23 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTCโ‰ˆ2,120 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

24 AGOSTO 2016: PER NON DIMENTICARE โ™ฅ๏ธ @Terremotilive24

โค35๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ˜ญ4

23 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTCโ‰ˆ2,290 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/46976692

๐Ÿ˜ฑ14๐Ÿ‘2โค1

21 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTCโ‰ˆ2,510 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/46959762

๐Ÿ‘6

21 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTCโ‰ˆ2,400 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://terremoti.ingv.it/event/46962642

โค1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @terremotilive24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Planet ๐ŸŒ
@pianetafantastico ยท 24,514
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here โ€” alongside 59 others โ€” read 16 September 2026
๐ŸŽ™ AudioBook Italia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
@AudiolibriFreeCopyrite ยท 28,217
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here โ€” alongside 52 others โ€” read 10 September 2026
๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’กAccendi La Mente๐Ÿ”Œ๐Ÿ’ฅ
@accendilamente ยท 41,466
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here โ€” alongside 66 others โ€” read 29 August 2026
Le foto del passato
@lefotodelpassato ยท 61,307
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here โ€” alongside 67 others โ€” read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ŸŒ TERREMOTI Live 24 ๐ŸŒ‹โ€ (@terremotilive24), 7,577 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terremotilive24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.