Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Текстуалити

Channel

Текстуалити

@tex2ality

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,928subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460110417
TypeChannel
Username@tex2ality
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tex2ality

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,9264,9774,951.57 August 2026 — 4,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,977 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,975 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,970 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,965 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,954 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,945 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,943 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,935 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,933 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,929 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,926 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,928 subscribers4,9287 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,918–4,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:164,928+2
13 Sept 2026, 08:594,926-3
9 Sept 2026, 08:394,929-4
4 Sept 2026, 01:014,933-2
31 Aug 2026, 23:474,935-8
29 Aug 2026, 09:034,943-1
26 Aug 2026, 18:224,944-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:264,945-9
19 Aug 2026, 21:454,954-11
16 Aug 2026, 21:574,965-5
13 Aug 2026, 14:364,970-5
10 Aug 2026, 14:354,975-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:304,977no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:254,977first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

838 reactions across 14 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35342.1%
🔥14116.8%
😁11413.6%
👍364.30%
💯333.94%
🤣323.82%
🙈252.98%
custom 5393462262067373787202.39%
🦄141.67%
🍓80.955%
😭80.955%
60.716%
🙉60.716%
👌50.597%
💅50.597%
❤‍🔥40.477%
👏40.477%
👾40.477%
🤝40.477%
👀30.358%
7 further kinds131.55%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 838 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 15 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tex2ality. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 March 2026 to 4 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 05:04 UTC995 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Понедельничное «Чур, без гугла»

  1. естественнонаучный чат-бот39%
  2. естественно-научный чат-бот38%
  3. естественно-научный чатбот12%
  4. естественнонаучный чатбот11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 539346226206737378720😭8👾4😱3🏆2

30 Apr 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,290 views36 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А помните, я вас месяц назад звала на наш курс по сильным текстам? Зря не пошли, там вон что сейчас творится) Открыли лист ожидания на осенний поток. Зарегистрировавшимся, как всегда, предложим самые большие скидки и самые выгодные рассрочки. А ещё учеников будет снова брать Маруся! Кто такая Маруся, читать вот тут. • Обновлённая программа курса.

17🔥15🤝4

27 Apr 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,220 views62 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Комплименты – это очень серьёзно и выгодно, а не просто весело и приятно. Не верите?) 1. Эксперименты (отправлю ссылки в коммент) показывают, что простое восхищение выбором человека (например, его одеждой) значительно увеличивает вероятность, что он согласится на вашу последующую просьбу. Но только если она НЕ связана с темой комплимента. 2. Официант, который похвалит ваш выбор основного блюда, заметно повысит так

43🔥15💯4

21 Apr 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,960 views97 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это настолько примитивный совет, что я долго стеснялась его оформлять в отдельный пост. Но он, блин, эффективный! Настолько, что его нельзя продолжать игнорировать в блоге про текстовые коммуникации в целом и про текстовые продажи в частности. Тем более, это ещё и один из моих личных способов жить жизнь приятнее, наполнять её чудесами. Конец прелюдии. Короче. ДЕЛАЙТЕ. ЛЮДЯМ. КОМПЛИМЕНТЫ. Спасибо, кэп? Да пожалуйс

68🔥14💯131🎃1

13 Apr 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,250 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🙈25👍13🙉6🔥5🤔1😎1

13 Apr 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Мокрые трусы – подходящий повод воскресить нашу понедельничную рубрику «Чур, без гугла», потому что я, например, благодаря им узнала, что всю жизнь писала неправильно вот это слово… ⤵️

6 Apr 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,380 views57 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

5 золотых сюжетов бизнес-сторителлинга Для начала – база: сторителлинг = трансформация героя в результате проживания / преодоления вызова. Что бы вам ни писали в сети разные мамкины копирайтеры и нейросети, обученные на их текстах, просто-любой-длинный-пост НЕ становится сторителлингом автоматически. Даже если он увлекательный! Нет трансформации – НЕТ сторителлинга. Если сильно упростить, то • условное падение ге

29🔥18👌5❤‍🔥2👍2🗿1

4 Apr 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,070 views57 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

...счастливая Золушка открыла макбук, а фея посмотрела на неё внимательно и сказала так: — Прекрасное дитя, в миг, когда часы пробьют полночь, твой хайповый мем, который придумали неделю назад, который раскрутился позавчера, о котором ты узнала вчера и который хочешь запостить завтра — превратится в тыкву. 🎃 Твой макбук обернётся в леново, а подписчики — в крыс. И вместо трендов ты снова окажешься в своём штоп

😁35💯14💅5😢2🗿1

Signed кот Бублик

3 Apr 2026, 03:55 UTC≈1,010 views98 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мир чертовски несправедлив. Например, мы считаем красивых более умными и вызывающими доверие, чем они есть на самом деле. Исследования показывают, что при прочих равных мы и купим скорее у симпатичного продавца, чем у обычного. Так действует эффект ореола – когнитивное искажение, которое нас заставляет переоценивать целиком-мета-персону по какому-то её одному ярко положительному качеству. Исторически так по-дурацки

45🔥26👍13😁7❤‍🔥2🍓2💯2🗿1

31 Mar 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,130 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дружище, ну мы про тебя не знали такого)) Оказывается, вон чё пишет про нашего куратора выпускница Екатерина: Очень хочу поблагодарить Тимура. Я весь курс вывозила только на его обратной связи. Спасибо, что она была подробной, с большим количеством рекомендаций. Я понимаю, что ему могло быть непросто с новичком, как я, но он был терпелив и тактичен*, поэтому я чувствовала заботу, и что ему не все равно. Такое участ

17😁112

29 Mar 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,420 views29 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Хьюстон, срочно У нас слетела одна бронь на Тимура Галимова. Это филолог, редактор в it-компании, соавтор текстуалити-курса и автор самых умных постов этого блога. Хорош в сторителлинге и художественных приёмах (и русской обсценной лексике). Самый строгий, дотошный, внимательный, эрудированный, пишет огромные разборы, очень подробные. Быстрей остальных даёт ОС – как правило, на следующий день. Вот пример его разб

24🦄5

28 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,120 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А что, Маруся ушла из «Текстуалити»? Внимательный подписчик заметил, что мы не собираем в этот раз группу Маруси Поповой, самого нежного, эмпатичного из кураторов. Она что, больше не обучает? Мы что, поругались!?) Нет, просто Маруся нашла классную работу, о которой давно мечтала (учит сберовский «Гигачат» писать нормальные тексты и редактирует его генерации), и сильно там сейчас занята. ◉ Вернётся ли? Не исключено,

38👍8👀3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tex2ality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 May 2026, 05:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz358 voters

Понедельничное «Чур, без гугла»

  1. естественнонаучный чат-бот39%
  2. естественно-научный чат-бот38%
  3. естественно-научный чатбот12%
  4. естественнонаучный чатбот11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 4 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Карты, тексты, два ствола
@remingtonist · 27,301
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Пиши Касука
@pishi_kasuka · 26,724
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 43,105
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Вакансии для копирайтеров
@copywriter_vacancies · 29,759
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Текстуалити” (@tex2ality), 4,928 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tex2ality.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.