Channel
@textttalkh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,724subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001362684488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @textttalkh |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/textttalkh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 18,724 | +14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 18,710 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 18,711 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:32 | 18,718 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 18,715 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 18,718 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 18,717 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 18,701 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 18,688 | +12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 18,676 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 18,672 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 18,675 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 18,671 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 18,683 | +8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 18,675 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 18,677 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 18,689 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 18,688 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 18,709 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 18,721 | first reading |
238 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 183 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 238 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 89,701 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
373 reactions across 99 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 136 | 36.5% | |
| 👏 | 79 | 21.2% | |
| 💔 | 64 | 17.2% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 10.7% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 9.92% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.88% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هر وقت میخوام یه متن قشنگ استوری کنم از اینجا برمیدارم، •• @lLOVE_you ••🤍 متنهاش به شدت عاشقانه است:🥹🌸 ┈┈┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┉┈┈ ╮🛍﮼آهنـگهای هوشمصنوعی ╯─⋆๋﮼@Pezhvak5 ╮🎀﮼استوری پروفایل ╯─⋆๋﮼@CafeStoory ╮🛍﮼حس آرامش ╯─⋆๋﮼@halleee_khoob ╮🎀﮼اعـتـرافـاتِ ؏ـاشـقـانـه ╯─⋆๋﮼@Txext_love ╮🛍﮼حــرفِ حسـاب تلــخ ╯─⋆๋﮼@textttalkh ╮🎀﮼خود آرایی ╯─⋆๋﮼@Makeupnazz ╮🛍﮼کلبه امید ╯─⋆๋﮼@colbeeh_aramesh ╮🎀﮼تڪست رمانتیــڪ ╯─⋆๋﮼@yavashak…
Sticker, posted without a caption
خرید در ۴ قسط دقیقاً چطور انجام میشه⁉️ 🔰 راهنمای خیلی کوتاه خرید اقساطی رو اینجا ببین 🔰
💣برای خرید کیت، لازم نیست کل مبلغ رو یکجا بدی ‼️ ⚽️⚽️جدیدترین کیتهای فصل ۲۰۲۶/۲۷ از محبوبترین تیمهای اروپا، با قیمت مناسب و امکان پرداخت در ۴ قسط از طریق اسنپپی و تربپی ✅✅ 🗣️مدلها، قیمتها و موجودیهای جدید رو داخل کانال ببین و کیت تیمت رو انتخاب کن: ✈️ @allfasports
زیادی خودتو مهم نکن؛ بعضیا فقط حوصلهی جواب دادن ندارن. .
من عوض نشدم، فقط دیگه برای هر کسی خوب بودن رو بلد نیستم. .
بعضیا رو باید همونجایی که شناختی، همونجا هم فراموش کنی. .
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔹🔹 📰 📰 🔹🔹 پـولـدار شـدن آرزو نیسـت! تصمیــمش بــا خــودتــه!🔝 شاید دیدن این ویدیو زندگیت رو تغییر بده! پس روی این لینک ضربه بزن 📱 کـانـال تـلـگـرام 👇👇👇 🆔 @Kingofdarkesm 🚨💝 مـشـاوره و ثـبـت سـفـارش ✅ 👩🏻💻@BlackpnatherXm2 ⚠️ 👧🏻 از این پیام، ساده رد نشو !! شاید تنها فرصت طلایی 💢 زندگیت باشه ! ❌🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢❌
[ آنکه سکوت را انتخاب کرده یک بار تقریبا همه چیز را گفته. ] .
مُهم نیست کی دورته مُهم اینه کی به فکرته ! .
ما از آنان که به خندهایمان حسادت میکردند: غمگین تر بودیم💔 @textttalkh 🦅
Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @textttalkh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@textttalkh edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@textttalkh named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تڪسٺᵗᵉˣᵗ𝕋т𝐚𝕝𝐤𝐡 🦅” (@textttalkh), 18,724 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/textttalkh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.