Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,482. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,871–20,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:38
19,093
-25
5 Nov 2026, 00:10
19,118
-16
3 Nov 2026, 20:59
19,134
-16
2 Nov 2026, 20:58
19,150
-14
1 Nov 2026, 23:09
19,164
-12
31 Oct 2026, 22:35
19,176
-12
30 Oct 2026, 20:56
19,188
-17
29 Oct 2026, 18:27
19,205
-20
28 Oct 2026, 21:37
19,225
-14
27 Oct 2026, 20:25
19,239
-11
26 Oct 2026, 18:31
19,250
-14
25 Oct 2026, 15:36
19,264
-19
24 Oct 2026, 12:40
19,283
-30
23 Oct 2026, 11:01
19,313
-12
22 Oct 2026, 12:58
19,325
-23
21 Oct 2026, 05:58
19,348
-21
20 Oct 2026, 02:19
19,369
-14
19 Oct 2026, 05:27
19,383
-18
18 Oct 2026, 03:05
19,401
-21
17 Oct 2026, 00:41
19,422
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈257
Videos
≈53
Links
≈1,320
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,256 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,157
51.3%
custom 5328254513801365510
444
19.7%
custom 5339200530012987399
203
9.00%
custom 5422461670796594939
126
5.59%
custom 5458632296225605246
102
4.52%
custom 5334873999002332292
87
3.86%
custom 5458810949685249086
59
2.62%
custom 5330216532171580849
48
2.13%
custom 5258050588993679408
30
1.33%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5,481
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
1,220
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tg_gifts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2025 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
BTC > $76 400, ETH > $2380 💰
🤑Криптаны снова почувствовали вкус жизни – BTC +10%, ETH +25% за последние 48 часов. С понедельника в крипторынок зашло около $400 млрд – почти 20% от его капитализации в начале этого движения.
Наш чат для комфортного общения - @minetnya
✉️ Telegram уже заработал $100+ млн на подарках. А что с GRAM? 🙂
💵За все время Telegram заработал на обычных подарках уже ~$100 млн, а в пиковые периоды подарки могут приносить платформе сотни тысяч долларов в день.
🫡 Монетизация работает на ура, но с GRAM ситуация пока совсем другая:
– 32,2% кошельков вообще пустые (0 GRAM)
– 64,3% держат менее 1 GRAM
– Менее 1% адресов накопили более 10 токенов
То есть затянуть …
🚀Telegram запустил челлендж, где можно получить $100 просто за доброе дело
Всё максимально просто:
🧹 Найдите место, которое давно просит уборки — двор, улицу, заброшенный уголок у дома.
🌱 Или помогите соседу: постригите газон, приведите в порядок участок и т. д.
📸 Сделайте фото «до/после» и покажите результат.
А теперь самое интересное:
🥇 4 лучших работы получат от Telegram по $100.
⌛ Но времени мало — на выпо…
Один из разработчиков TON, Анатолий Макосов, рассказал, что команда хотела ускорить сеть перед ожидаемым наплывом пользователей. Однако после изменений производительность, наоборот, снизилась примерно на 7%.
Сейчас многие замечают, что транзакции в сети TON стали проходить медленнее. Заметили это и вы? 👀
🟡 Наш чат для комфортного общения - @minetnya
$498 000 за юзернейм в Telegram 👀
Именно за столько вчера купили на аукционе никнейм @роІуmаrkеt.
Самое интересное, что три года назад этот юзернейм был куплен всего за $224. То есть его потенциальная стоимость выросла более чем в 2 000 раз.
Пытается ли сама команда Polymarket выкупить свой бренд — пока неизвестно.
Наш чат для комфортного общения - @minetnya
В нашем @ifnode началась 🎁«Новогодняя битва популярности» среди участников чата, легко можно получить призы в подарках или sp.
Основная суть, что нужно знать:
🔥Популярность - рейтинг разных подарков ifnode;
получить их можно от друзей или же открывая коробочки с популярностью в магазине за SP. Например, Павел Дуров подарил вам тортик, ваша популярность увеличится на 15 очков.
🟡SP - Валюта ifnode;
получить можно за …
🆕Глобальное обновление в кубостарсе 🎲
🎁Dice Pass & Уровни
Добавлен новый пасс, а именно Dice pass - стоимость ⭐️30 на 30 дней.
После пробного/прем периода - если пасс не куплен - дается 1 фри попытка в воскресенье в промежуток 00:00 - 23:59 мск
🎁Уровни игрока
Изначально у всех бронзовый; от них зависит диапазон награды в звездах.
Уровни прокачиваются от XP (опыт); за бросок куба дается +1 XP
- 0-50 XP - Бронзовый…
С одной стороны прикольно, что сделали огран с приоритетом на старые акки, но смысл от уровня, который и так повышается только из тех звезд, которые идут телеграмму.
Если так будет всегда на каждый гифт, покупать в приоритете смогут всегда только определенное колво людей.
Аккаунт 2018 года - через 10:30 ч.
+ улучшения на кнопки вышло
🎁🎁
Премиум чат 💬
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tg_gifts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мир PUBG MOBILE @pubgmMIR · 21,609 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 20 September 2026
𝐋𝐈𝐙𝐎𝐊_𝐒𝐒𝐊 @lizok_ssk · 23,687 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 27 September 2026
Глеб @glebasik21 · 183,185 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 27 August 2026
🏆 REFLEX STREAM @REFLEX_STREAM · 22,498 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 18 September 2026
𝑭𝑬𝑵𝑹𝑰𝑹 𝑷𝑼𝑩𝑮 🐺 @fenrir_ads_pubg · 70,639 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 1 September 2026
НАБОР В КЛАН | ЦДК 🍓#2 @offxc5 · 22,103 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 19 September 2026
Закрытый канал Erokez'a @ErokezBiba · 33,653 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 7 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑰𝑭 𝑯𝒖𝒃” (@tg_gifts), 19,093 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_gifts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.