Channel
@tga441
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003983076905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tga441 |
| Created | 11 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tga441 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 9 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 7 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 6 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 6 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (11 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢瑞森老哥Reason|人... 📢骚货小妹妹多种道具轮流裸... 📢菲律賓修車 馬尼拉修車 ... 📢欧博百家乐 亚星百家乐 ... 📢反差女友福利社 📢韩国女团ssoa|美少女... 📢华纳国际_百家乐_AG真... 📢哎呀喂 📢SEO Official... 📢兰兰 paradox 📢电报零粉起步轻松涨粉 📢皇冠官方 皇冠开户 利博... 📢线上百家乐 在线百家乐 ... 📢小姐姐私密原味 内衣 丝... 📢绿帽淫妻真人私信组 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢芊芊 📢新盛公司开户--新盛会员... 📢西安全城洗浴安排🛁 📢人妻偷情 人妻少妇 无码... 📢正同学 📢万利网址 万利注册 PA... 📢欧博百家乐|亚星百家乐|... 📢恋足癖,玉足,舔脚 📢测试 📢皇冠招商 欧博招商 亚星... 📢皇冠平台 皇冠真人 利博... 📢淫妻少妇夫妻单男交流 📢高颜值,女神,校花 📢奇怪的仙人掌|灵异|恐怖 📢2026世界杯 世界杯下... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢 TGFind🚀Telegram最高效的搜索平台！ 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
BG真人视讯 爱游戏官方网站 菠菜网址 pinned a GIF
#缅甸新盛娱乐新盛直营放心娱乐 三合一实体平台 现场手机同步在线 先发牌后下注 公平公正公开 24小时现场直播与手机同步在线 充值取款方式支持银行卡 支付宝 微信 USDT 康讯币 缅币KBZpay 现金存等等 #充值取款大额小额无忧3-5分钟秒到账 资金###安全保障本人在现场可以电话视频验证 金沙娱乐网址 https://52.184.103.176:4646/?s=1&t=582417&i=53545 新盛娱乐网址 xs10825.com 新盛娱乐APP网页版网址 www.xs558.com 新盛娱乐app下载链接📲📱 🔰🔰 xs01.app 🔰🔰 xs02.app 招商专员✈️ @xm88722 开户专员✈️ @xm88722 代理专员✈️@xm88722 联系QQ 🐥3281037134 联系微信📬 hnt3120 代理可匿名开线，佣金奖励全部USDT结算，城招个人代理，团队代理，网站站长，飞机群…
❤1
Channel name was changed to «BG真人视讯 爱游戏官方网站 菠菜网址»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tga441. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 753,839 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tga441 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BG真人视讯 爱游戏官方网站 菠菜网址” (@tga441), 9 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tga441.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.