interesting btw
π2

Channel
@the_journey63
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
142subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003146653596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_journey63 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_journey63 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 142 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 140 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 137 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 137 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
94 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 40 | 42.6% | |
| π₯ | 20 | 21.3% | |
| π | 11 | 11.7% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 10 | 10.6% | |
| π | 6 | 6.38% | |
| π | 2 | 2.13% | |
| π | 2 | 2.13% | |
| π€― | 2 | 2.13% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
interesting btw
π2
Was reading a paper about steganography using LLMs, and it made an interesting point. It said something like, we call the time before humanity started writing "pre-history". So as LLMs become more popular, and more of the writing produced is no longer written by humans, we might call our time "the end of history" or "post-history". But there's another way to look at it. We call prehistory what it is because that tiβ¦
β¨Hey, I need some help from the community Iβm currently conducting usability research and user interviews for the CBE Mobile Banking app, and Iβm looking for real user feedback βοΈ If youβre a Telegram channel owner, Iβd really appreciate it if you could share this survey with your community If you use the CBE Mobile Banking app, please take a few minutes to share your experience. Your feedback will help us identifβ¦
β€2
α αα α α΅α¨α«α¨α―αΈα α α°α°α αα« αααΈαα’
β€5
Week-4 log * Programming side: β’ working on one Management Systems β’ Brainstorming an application gonna start the development soon β’ Brainstormed a bot that will help for the book review team (development will end soon) β’ Received a repo of Medersa(Islamic school) Systems - i was rebuilding it (i can say that from the amount of time it is taking) [Phase 2/5] β’ Building SmartBizERPlite for @sofomartech internshβ¦
π₯9β€4
Now it has joined the 'Books i have Read' list ... it is a really good book i enjoyed the middle part and i run through the first and the last chapters -- since it contains the junk repeating concepts that you find on self help book -- I would rate it around [3.7/5]. Might rate it better if the flaw was the same on all over the book but it didn't unfortunately @the_journey63
β€2
accountability partner ~ a person that makes sure that you are in a line and doing the things that you are supposed to do... do you have an accountability partner? @the_journey63
π₯3π1
We might have our own event soon ... in which we might add value for both technical and non-technical peoples ... who knows @the_journey63
π₯7π1
Well it was my Airst Dev Event and it was an amazing one ... different topics were covered by different panalist but the one that was catchy to me was the discussion about the difference having that real skill and pretending to have one And met alot of good peoples additionally from the aboves #RaycastMeetup #Community @the_journey63
β€3β€βπ₯3
What a lovely event with the team @codeandthought @the_journey63 @iwhxbi @sifendev @salimsirajofficial π
β€βπ₯7π₯1π1
πββοΈ ... weyne so the juma ended without me sending selewat π€¦ββοΈπ₯² ... anyways i want some rewards Ψ΅Ω ΨΉΩΩ ΩΨ¨ΩΩΨ§ Ω ΨΩ Ψ― ... Ψ§ΩΩΩΩ Ψ΅Ω ΩΨ³ΩΩ ΨΉΩΩ ΩΨ¨ΩΩΨ§ Ω ΨΩ Ψ― πβ€οΈβπ©Ή @the_journey63
β€14π3
βProductivity isnβt about being a workhorse, keeping busy or burning the midnight oil...Itβs more about priorities, planning, and fiercely protecting your time." βMargarita Tartakovsky ~ from THE One thing ... take the note about what productivity is about @the_journey63
β€2π2π₯°1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @the_journey63. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΏππ π΅ππππππβ (@the_journey63), 142 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_journey63.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.