Channel
@the_rustling_of_pages
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002402279475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_rustling_of_pages |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_rustling_of_pages |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 23 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 22 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 20 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 19 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 92.3% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Люшке то уже двадцатка стукнула.. 🐝🌼 И я буду очень рада, если вы сделаете мне в честь этого подарок! А лучший подарок художнику, это репост его работ ✨🫶
❤1💘1
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
маленько вышло, ну оно и хорошо.
❤1
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
шелест страниц. pinned «вишлист от луми! и так, через 11 дней мое день рождения, потому я решила сделать небольшой виш-лист. первый раз такое делаю... горю сразу, что мне будет очень приятно если вы подарите мне обычною открытку, самодельную.ишоушку и вообще все что в сделайте своими…»
вишлист от луми! и так, через 11 дней мое день рождения, потому я решила сделать небольшой виш-лист. первый раз такое делаю... горю сразу, что мне будет очень приятно если вы подарите мне обычною открытку, самодельную.ишоушку и вообще все что в сделайте своими ручками. я такое очень люблю и ценю! китайфд не отпускает меня уже третий год, так что можете дарить мне по им все что угодно: фигурки, стенды, брелки и т.д …
❤1
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
давненько у нас не было бифлифов, потому вот.
❤3
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
От автора: из романа «Благословение небожителей», вы все помните главы о том как Хуа Чэн стал маленьким. В этой же зарисовке я хочу написать про маленького Хэ Сюань, и о том как Ши Цинсюань заботился о нем. Приятного вам прочтения! Хэ Сюань, точнее Мин И, пошел на задания. Все было нормально, пока в один момент он почувствовал слабость, и увидел то, что вокруг все стало каким-то большим! Слишком большим. Неужели он …
❤3
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
это мое одно из основных хобби))
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
читать и писать фанфики))
❤1
Signed 𝙎𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙭𝙭𝙫 𐙚
Прикольно
Signed Софія
всем подписаться на канал этого чудесного человека, который озвучил мою работу по жанваням!
➖🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠➖ Автор текста - @lumiiisketshers345 (TikTok) (Спасибо большое за возможность озвучить вашу работу) #озвучка #эрха #жанвани #МоЖань_ЧуВаньнин
На заднем дворе дворца Сюаньчжэнь было слышно брязг метала, а потом то, как кто-то или что-то резко упало на землю. Это был Фэн Синь, который оказался побежденным на повал от сабли Му Цина. Во времена Сяньлэ, Му Цин был последним по силе, с Его Высочеством он даже не смел соревноваться, ведь знал, что тот сильнее и лучше его, и даже не потому что Се Лянь являлся принцем и эму нужно говорить что он лучший во всем, а п…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @the_rustling_of_pages. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@the_rustling_of_pages named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шелест страниц.” (@the_rustling_of_pages), 23 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_rustling_of_pages.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.