Channel
@the_sake_of_medicine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,556subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001202683876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_sake_of_medicine |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_sake_of_medicine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 3,556 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 3,552 | +6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 3,546 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 3,540 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 September 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,929 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 AIAPGET 2027 — ONLY ~10 MONTHS TO GO! 🚨 Assuming exam to be in July 2027. It sounds far… but it’s NOT! ⏳ The students who start NOW will have enough time to: 📚 Complete the syllabus 🔁 Revise multiple times 📝 Solve hundreds of MCQs 📊 Analyse & improve mock scores 🎯 Build a rank-worthy preparation strategy 🔥 DON’T WAIT FOR THE EXAM NOTIFICATION TO START. Start early. Test yourself early. Improve early. 🚀 Join the…
🔥1
JOIN FOR MORE https://t.me/aim_for_aiapget24 Whatts app https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va5gC0CI1rcoRatjXO0w Instagram https://www.instagram.com/aim_for_aiapget_20__?stkn=NDU1N2MwZnNmOGt0
📚 MEDBOOK LIBRARY – AVAILABLE MATERIALS 🎥 Medical & PG Study Materials 1. LRR Video Lectures 2. Cerebellum Video Lectures 3. Marrow 8th Edition Notes 4. Torrento Notes 5. PG Plus – Both Parts 6. Mudit Khanna – Both Volumes 7. PG Entrance Exam – 22,000+ MCQs 8. Sure Success Magic Book 9. Anatomy Career Connect Notes 10. 1000+ Objective MCQs for UPSC 11. And many more 🔥 🩺 AIAPGET Books 1. Success – 4 Volumes 2. Tar…
👍1
https://t.me/aim_for_aiapget24
🚨 AIAPGET 2026 Question Paper with Answers 🚨 Compiled by Dr. Muskan Rathor (The Sake Of Medicine) 🩺⚕️
👏1
What is your score??
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎉1👍1
https://exams.nta.nic.in/answer-key-challenge-and-qp-display-of-aiapget-2026/ Answer key released.....
Starting from 15th September. To enroll, DM @muskan_rathor24
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dc0GOmVPwVM/?igsi=ZHFkbmQ4N3R6bmY=
👍1
🚨🎯AIAPGET 2026 & 2025 had a question from this single Table 📊 Take a screenshot and stick it near your desk 📌...... 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcxuC3ioE-1/?igsi=anYydG9vYnVmMWUx Comment "Table" to get the image in your DMs 📩.
👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1🔥1
Sullivan index is? [AIAPGET 2026] https://t.me/thesakeofmedicine
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @the_sake_of_medicine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What is your score??
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Sullivan index is? [AIAPGET 2026] https://t.me/thesakeofmedicine
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
7.A patient presents with severe chest pain radiating to left arm for 2 hours. Which is the earliest marker to rise in myocardial infarction?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
6.Most sensitive investigation for early detection of diabetic nephropathy is:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Bicarbonate is reabsorbed in PCT with the help of
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following nerve does not innervate the muscles of gluteal region?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Sake Of Medicine” (@the_sake_of_medicine), 3,556 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_sake_of_medicine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.