Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ڕۆح💭💙

Channel

ڕۆح💭💙

@the_soul_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

236subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233276782
TypeChannel
Username@the_soul_official
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/the_soul_official

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

236241238.56 August 2026 — 241 subscribers7 August 2026 — 241 subscribers22 August 2026 — 239 subscribers15 September 2026 — 236 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:59236-3
22 Aug 2026, 11:04239-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:32241no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:42241first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍350.0%
❤233.3%
💔116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2023 to 24 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Apr 2025, 14:44 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026

هـیچ پـێگـەیـشتـنـێـك بـێ تـێگـەیـشتـن نـەبـووە بـۆیـە تـێـبــگـە بــا پـێـبـگـــەی .🧠❤️

Signed в𝐀ㄚ𝐀я

24 Apr 2025, 14:44 UTC109 viewsread 7 August 2026

تشتێ گران و بسەنگ هەمی ناگەهنێ 😍🔥"

Signed в𝐀ㄚ𝐀я

19 Feb 2025, 22:35 UTC152 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

پێغەمبەری خودا(ﷺ)فەرموویەتی: خۆشبەختی بۆ ئەو کەسەی بە عەیبی خۆیەوە سەرقاڵە نەک بە عەیبی خەڵکی.🤍🥰

❤1

Signed в𝐀ㄚ𝐀я

18 Dec 2024, 00:07 UTC198 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanasrawVoice message

𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗖𝗟𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 🪐🤎

Signed ◡̈

13 Dec 2024, 01:16 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanasraw

🥺❤ ئەگەر ناخەویت وەرە چات

Signed ◡̈ 👾 BITS Ⓜ️ MEMES

30 Nov 2024, 13:49 UTC207 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ئەم پۆستە تایبەت بە گەیمەرانی پەبجیە⚡ ✅ ئەکاونتێك دەکرێتە خەڵات بوو ئەو کەسانەی داخلی ئەم چانێڵە دەبن .کاتێك چانێڵەکەمان گەیشتە 3k میمبەر ئەکاونتەکە دەکەینە خەلات لە رێگەی ئەم لینکەوە جۆینی چانێڵ بکەن 📍 https://t.me/+RT8XRiiW7GZiZjcy

Signed ◡̈ 👾 BITS Ⓜ️ MEMES

20 Jun 2024, 22:01 UTC288 viewsread 7 August 2026

🥺❤ ئەگەر ناخەویت وەرە چات

Signed Ghalb ◡̈

19 Jun 2024, 23:36 UTC281 viewsread 7 August 2026

﴿ بۆ بەژداری ڪردن لە لیـستم سـەرو 700+ جۆیــن وەرئەگـرم🤍❗️ ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @LeOoM

Signed 𓌹 LeoOy hajee 𓌺

1 May 2024, 10:45 UTC294 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @llutteryVoice message

S' afta ta matia pou koito Ton erota na vro..! کاتێك لە چاوەکانت دەروانم، با ئەشق بدۆزمەوە و ببینم..! 1:15 ˡᵒᵗᵗᵉʳʸ

Signed Ghalb ◡̈

18 Apr 2024, 00:54 UTC288 viewsread 7 August 2026

🥺❤ ئەگەر ناخەویت وەرە چات

Signed Ghalb ◡̈

16 Apr 2024, 22:04 UTC294 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗖𝗟𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 🪐🤎

Signed Ghalb ◡̈

11 Apr 2024, 01:28 UTC289 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @llutteryVideo

لە تەمەندا یەکجار کەسێک تا ناو ڕەگی دڵت دەچێ وە دەرناچێت خەمگینیەکە لەو دێڕە کۆ دەبێتەوە کە دەڵێت (نابن بە ھی یەک) جا بە ھەر ھۆکارێک بێت یان ئەڕوات یان ئەڕۆیت..! •

💔1

Signed Ghalb ◡̈

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @the_soul_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ڕۆح💭💙” (@the_soul_official), 236 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_soul_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.