9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,757–6,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 15:44
6,777
-18
27 Aug 2026, 14:43
6,795
-23
24 Aug 2026, 10:48
6,818
-19
21 Aug 2026, 04:13
6,837
-11
17 Aug 2026, 21:23
6,848
-10
15 Aug 2026, 00:33
6,858
-36
11 Aug 2026, 06:06
6,894
-16
8 Aug 2026, 01:37
6,910
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:47
6,910
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 6,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
744
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
43 (6 August 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
32,009
Reactions total
2,395
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,395 reactions across 28 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
285
11.9%
🎉
283
11.8%
❤
281
11.7%
👍
281
11.7%
🥰
257
10.7%
😍
255
10.6%
❤🔥
250
10.4%
💯
250
10.4%
🤩
230
9.60%
👏
23
0.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bought a bag of SpyChain here
Lowcap but big potential.
SpyChain is an Arbitrum Orbit L2 which settles on BNB Smart Chain, built for onchain stock markets and using $SPYB as native gas.
CA: 0x928661e51934D54576913aED820068B5395D7777
$SPYC is the protocol token used across market bonds, protocol liquidity, governance and ecosystem incentives.
SpyChain starts with SPY5, a liquidity system built around the five lar…
After almost a 4X call $GEOM with $GLND stock got hit HARD today after Greenland pushed back and drilling got delayed for now until 2027 👀 Being Larry is the Dev of $GEOM and Chairman of $GLND which founded it along with USFM obviously $GEOM going to be like a leveraged play on it. USFM is actively drilling in Greenland though which is the other Founding company which Larry is also involved in. Wouldn’t be surprised …
$GEOM chart coiling up looks like the definition of first slowly then all at once 👀 One major catalyst on $GEOM over the next couple days and it teleports 🤯🚀 So many things can happen with the Trump, BlackRock, Citadel connections let alone Greenland all over the news right now 💯 Regardless with the partnerships forming and what they’re building from what I’m hearing, the chart pricing it all in is a matter of time 💪…
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 $15 trillion BlackRock says tokenization is the "next generation for markets."
4 days after investing into $GLND which is directly connected to $GEOM 🤯🚀 Do you understand!? 👀 First slowly, then all at once but so much HIYORR 📈
3X with size so far on $GEOM and chart looks primed 👀 With BlackRock announcing investing in Larry Swets $GLND which is connected with $GEOM a day after he told holders he was working on getting some of his TradFi friends involved let alone Citadel already involved.. Expecting crime candles on our Moonbags soon 🤯🚀 Paytience is key here 💯 First slowly and all at once but so much HIYORR 📈
Trump just announced a $3B dollar mining project in Greenland and USFM was quoted 👀 USFM is one of the Nasdaq companies working on $GEOM and shares owned by Larry Swet of $GLND 🤯🚀 So much HIYORR 📈
https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/08/07/trump-mining-critical-minerals/
🤩14🥰11❤🔥10🎉9👍9❤8😍8🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @theapechinesecall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PumpFrenzy Ape Calls” (@theapechinesecall), 6,777 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theapechinesecall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.