The Crypto Cube pinned a photo

Channel
The Crypto Cube
@thecryptocube
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,889subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001732471824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecryptocube |
| Description | Here technical and fundamental analysis, news, training resources, updates and benefits. Twitter: https://twitter.com/The_Crypto_Cube |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 4 June 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecryptocube |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:03 | 12,889 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:33 | 12,890 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 12,891 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 12,892 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 12,893 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 12,894 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 12,895 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 12,896 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 12,896 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 31
- Links
- 54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
OP/USDT accumulation zone OP is traded on 2,5$ level since several weeks with no bearish pattern in every timeframe. Buy zone: 2,50$ Take profit: 3,50$ - 3,80$ - $4,00 Trade on BitGet with a 20% fee discount forever! #DYOR
EU Commission Launches Proposal for Study of Automated DeFi Supervision LINK
For the first time this year, ether’s market share of trade volume achieved 50% parity with Bitcoin’s
UK to Introduce Legislation on Stablecoins by August: BoE’s Cunliffe LINK
Binance set to drop bitcoin trading fees to zero on select pairs globally LINK
The proportion of #Bitcoin supply in loss has hit 48.1% of all coins held outside exchanges.
Jordan Belfort would be "shocked" if holding BTC for 3-5 years does not turn out to be a profitable investment strategy. LINK
Italian government will provide $46 million in subsidies for blockchain projects LINK
Photo, posted without a caption
Exchange reserves continue to see large scale net withdrawals, with aggregate balances declining to levels last seen since July 2018
Binance responds to the investigation by Reuters; calls it ‘a false narrative’ LINK
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thecryptocube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Airdrop303 · 51 postAirdrop Loot
@Airdrop_Loote · 991 postCrypto drops
@criptolaunch · 851 postCrypto & Money
@Crypto_4money · 1,0301 postScripter Hero [ Official ]
@Cryptoherolovers · 1111 postDeFi airdrops
@defiairdros · 841 postM K TRICKS
@Earnings_Apps_Script · 2061 postGenuine Airdrops💥
@genuine_airdropz · 1221 postlegit bot test
@Legit_Airdrop_1 · 621 post✅ŁĘĞĮŤMÆŤĘ✅
@LEGITMATEE · 1511 postMango Airdrops
@mangoearners · 3551 postAirdrop~Booster
@MoneyBooster12 · 2681 postReal Airdrops
@RealAirdrops_io · 2421 postTOP REAL AIRDROP ✅
@Topnewairdropofficial · 5391 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypto Cube” (@thecryptocube), 12,889 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecryptocube.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.